Acute pain is a prevalent clinical concern that impacts millions worldwide and often initiates opioid use. Despite advances in multimodal analgesia, challenges such as opioid dependency, under-treatment, and patient heterogeneity persist. This narrative review aims to present recent evidence on emerging technologies in acute pain management, covering innovations in diagnostics, therapeutics, and drug delivery systems. We searched PubMed and Embase databases and included studies from 2015 to 2025 that presented positive evidence of the investigation of these technologies. The review identifies a wide range of emerging tools and interventions, including digital pain assessment scales, wearable biosensors, virtual reality, hypnosis, music therapy, and multimodal distraction. Pharmacological innovations such as sublingual sufentanil, liposomal bupivacaine, Nav 1.8 inhibitors, cebranopadol, and co-crystals of tramadol-celecoxib also show promise. Novel delivery systems - oral patient-controlled analgesics devices, transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl, and bioresorbable nerve stimulators - further enhance individualized pain control. Technological advancements are expanding the toolkit for acute pain management, offering non-opioid, patient-centered, and precision-based alternatives. However, further large-scale and longitudinal studies are required to validate their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.
{"title":"Emerging technologies in acute pain management.","authors":"Vendhan Ramanujam, Haley Warzecha, Yash Shah, Bijan Moazezi, Benjamin Rapsas, Kelsey Sawyer","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2631514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2631514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pain is a prevalent clinical concern that impacts millions worldwide and often initiates opioid use. Despite advances in multimodal analgesia, challenges such as opioid dependency, under-treatment, and patient heterogeneity persist. This narrative review aims to present recent evidence on emerging technologies in acute pain management, covering innovations in diagnostics, therapeutics, and drug delivery systems. We searched PubMed and Embase databases and included studies from 2015 to 2025 that presented positive evidence of the investigation of these technologies. The review identifies a wide range of emerging tools and interventions, including digital pain assessment scales, wearable biosensors, virtual reality, hypnosis, music therapy, and multimodal distraction. Pharmacological innovations such as sublingual sufentanil, liposomal bupivacaine, Nav 1.8 inhibitors, cebranopadol, and co-crystals of tramadol-celecoxib also show promise. Novel delivery systems - oral patient-controlled analgesics devices, transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl, and bioresorbable nerve stimulators - further enhance individualized pain control. Technological advancements are expanding the toolkit for acute pain management, offering non-opioid, patient-centered, and precision-based alternatives. However, further large-scale and longitudinal studies are required to validate their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510
Marguerite d'Ussel, Anne Coutaux, Julien Nizard, Nathan Moreau, Guillaume Durand
Introduction: Chronic pain exerts an enormous personal and economic burden, affecting around 30% of people worldwide yet both patients and providers report low satisfaction with chronic pain care. One of the potential causes stems from insufficient decision-making autonomy in chronic pain patients that hampers their ability to properly get involved in their treatment regimen. Improving said autonomy should thus allow better management in the clinical setting.
Methods: Via a conceptual and philosophical exploration informed by targeted literature, this Perspective examines the role of decision‑making autonomy in the care of patients living with chronic pain, a specific subject that is scarcely addressed in the literature.
Results: In chronic pain, patient autonomy is not only an ethical principle to be respected, but also a competence to foster. Promoting decision-making autonomy can improve pain management by fostering necessary patient empowerment and better involvement in one's treatment regimen.
Discussion: Concepts and specific tools exist that can help clinicians better evaluate and promote patient decision-making autonomy in their pain practice. Future avenues for research are suggested to help ensure that autonomy is better assessed in the clinical setting.
{"title":"Why should we assess and promote the decision-making autonomy of patients suffering from chronic pain? A perspective.","authors":"Marguerite d'Ussel, Anne Coutaux, Julien Nizard, Nathan Moreau, Guillaume Durand","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain exerts an enormous personal and economic burden, affecting around 30% of people worldwide yet both patients and providers report low satisfaction with chronic pain care. One of the potential causes stems from insufficient decision-making autonomy in chronic pain patients that hampers their ability to properly get involved in their treatment regimen. Improving said autonomy should thus allow better management in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via a conceptual and philosophical exploration informed by targeted literature, this Perspective examines the role of decision‑making autonomy in the care of patients living with chronic pain, a specific subject that is scarcely addressed in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In chronic pain, patient autonomy is not only an ethical principle to be respected, but also a competence to foster. Promoting decision-making autonomy can improve pain management by fostering necessary patient empowerment and better involvement in one's treatment regimen.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Concepts and specific tools exist that can help clinicians better evaluate and promote patient decision-making autonomy in their pain practice. Future avenues for research are suggested to help ensure that autonomy is better assessed in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646
Siri Bjorland, John Bjørneboe, Cecilie Røe, Mirad Taso, Kaia Engebretsen, Sigrid Skatteboe, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen, Nina Skorge, Jens Ivar Brox
Aims: Persistent neck pain is a leading cause of years lived with disability. The aim of the current study is to describe and evaluate cognitive functional therapy for patients with persistent neck pain.
Methods: We recruited 74 patients (73% women) aged 22-76 years, with persistent neck pain. The outcomes were neck pain at activity and rest measured by 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS), disability by Neck Disability Index (NDI) (0-100), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Hopkin Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) at baseline and post-treatment. The treatment program included 5 sessions and focused on cognitive strategies and exposure to physical activities.
Results: Sixty (81%) patients had follow-ups. Neck pain during activity was reduced by a mean of 3.3 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 3.2) and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.1) at rest. NDI was reduced by 16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5). Similar large improvements were observed for FABQ and HSCL-10. Ninety-eight percent of the participants reported that they would recommend the program to other patients.
Conclusions: Clinically relevant improvements were observed in pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and emotional distress following CFT in patients with persistent neck pain.
目的:持续颈部疼痛是多年残疾生活的主要原因。当前研究的目的是描述和评估认知功能疗法对持续性颈部疼痛患者的治疗效果。方法:我们招募了74例患者(73%为女性),年龄22-76岁,伴有持续性颈部疼痛。结果为活动和休息时颈部疼痛,采用11分数字评定量表(NRS)测量,残疾采用颈部残疾指数(NDI)(0-100),恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ),霍普金症状检查表(HSCL-10)在基线和治疗后测量。治疗方案包括5个疗程,重点是认知策略和接触体育活动。结果:60例(81%)患者随访。活动时颈部疼痛平均减少3.3(95%可信区间(CI) 2.6 - 3.2),休息时颈部疼痛平均减少2.5 (95% CI 1.9 - 3.1)。NDI降低了16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5)。在FABQ和HSCL-10中观察到类似的大改善。98%的参与者报告说,他们会向其他患者推荐这个项目。结论:在持续颈部疼痛患者进行CFT后,观察到疼痛、残疾、恐惧回避信念和情绪困扰的临床相关改善。
{"title":"Cognitive functional therapy for persistent neck pain.","authors":"Siri Bjorland, John Bjørneboe, Cecilie Røe, Mirad Taso, Kaia Engebretsen, Sigrid Skatteboe, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen, Nina Skorge, Jens Ivar Brox","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Persistent neck pain is a leading cause of years lived with disability. The aim of the current study is to describe and evaluate cognitive functional therapy for patients with persistent neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 74 patients (73% women) aged 22-76 years, with persistent neck pain. The outcomes were neck pain at activity and rest measured by 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS), disability by Neck Disability Index (NDI) (0-100), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Hopkin Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) at baseline and post-treatment. The treatment program included 5 sessions and focused on cognitive strategies and exposure to physical activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty (81%) patients had follow-ups. Neck pain during activity was reduced by a mean of 3.3 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 3.2) and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.1) at rest. NDI was reduced by 16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5). Similar large improvements were observed for FABQ and HSCL-10. Ninety-eight percent of the participants reported that they would recommend the program to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically relevant improvements were observed in pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and emotional distress following CFT in patients with persistent neck pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647
Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin
Objective: The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.
Methods: In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (n = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.
Results: At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.
Conclusions: This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.
{"title":"Analysis of chronic pain patients at a multidisciplinary spine center.","authors":"Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (<i>n</i> = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (<i>p</i> < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884
Hao G Duong, Tariq G Pulskamp, Daniel J Berlau
Ketamine's clinical role has expanded beyond anesthesia into a mechanism-based, non-opioid analgesic used across acute, perioperative, and chronic pain settings. As a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ketamine attenuates central sensitization, modulates opioid tolerance, and enhances descending inhibitory control. At subanaesthetic doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg), it consistently reduces pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability. In acute and perioperative care, analgesic efficacy is comparable to opioids, though clear superiority has not been demonstrated. In chronic pain, particularly complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), multi-day infusions provide temporary relief, but durability remains limited. In cancer-related pain, ketamine offers adjuvant benefits for opioid-refractory syndromes with variable outcomes. Short-term adverse effects such as dizziness and mild dysphoria are common, whereas psychomimetic symptoms, hepatobiliary injury, and cystitis restrict prolonged use. Overall, ketamine provides context-dependent, opioid-sparing analgesia with defined but specific clinical utility. Its evolving role in pain management will likely remain targeted, emphasizing patient selection, standardized dosing, and realistic expectations for benefit.
氯胺酮的临床作用已经超越了麻醉,成为一种基于机制的非阿片类镇痛药,用于急性、围手术期和慢性疼痛。作为一种非竞争性n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂,氯胺酮可减轻中枢致敏,调节阿片耐受性,并增强下行抑制控制。在亚麻醉剂量(0.1-0.5 mg/kg)下,它持续降低疼痛评分和术后阿片类药物消耗,同时保持血液动力学和呼吸稳定。在急性期和围手术期护理中,镇痛效果与阿片类药物相当,尽管没有明确的优势。对于慢性疼痛,特别是复杂的局部疼痛综合征(CRPS),多日的输液可以暂时缓解,但持久性仍然有限。在癌症相关疼痛中,氯胺酮为阿片类药物难治综合征提供了不同结果的辅助益处。短期不良反应如头晕和轻度烦躁是常见的,而拟精神病症状、肝胆损伤和膀胱炎限制了长期使用。总的来说,氯胺酮提供情境依赖,阿片类镇痛具有明确但具体的临床用途。它在疼痛管理中不断发展的作用可能仍然是有针对性的,强调病人的选择,标准化的剂量,以及对利益的现实期望。
{"title":"Ketamine for acute and chronic pain: beyond anaesthesia.","authors":"Hao G Duong, Tariq G Pulskamp, Daniel J Berlau","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketamine's clinical role has expanded beyond anesthesia into a mechanism-based, non-opioid analgesic used across acute, perioperative, and chronic pain settings. As a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ketamine attenuates central sensitization, modulates opioid tolerance, and enhances descending inhibitory control. At subanaesthetic doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg), it consistently reduces pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability. In acute and perioperative care, analgesic efficacy is comparable to opioids, though clear superiority has not been demonstrated. In chronic pain, particularly complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), multi-day infusions provide temporary relief, but durability remains limited. In cancer-related pain, ketamine offers adjuvant benefits for opioid-refractory syndromes with variable outcomes. Short-term adverse effects such as dizziness and mild dysphoria are common, whereas psychomimetic symptoms, hepatobiliary injury, and cystitis restrict prolonged use. Overall, ketamine provides context-dependent, opioid-sparing analgesia with defined but specific clinical utility. Its evolving role in pain management will likely remain targeted, emphasizing patient selection, standardized dosing, and realistic expectations for benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256
Amber Billens, Toon Hamelink, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck
Background: This study evaluated the feasibility of two minimally equipped, blended supervised and tele-supported exercise programs, a moderate intensity training (MIT) and high intensity training (HIT) program, in healthy sedentary adults, and explored signals of efficacy on central pain processing.
Methods: Participants were randomized to a 10-week MIT or HIT program, each comprising one supervised group session and two tele-supported home-based sessions per week. MIT involved a Start-to-Run protocol at 60-70% of heart rate reserve, while HIT involved strength exercises at > 80% of predicted maximum heart rate. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessed central pain processing pre- and post-intervention.
Results: Eighteen participants were enrolled (8 MIT, 10 HIT). Retention was lower in the MIT group (5 completed) than the HIT group (11 completed), with high adherence in both. Participants appreciated the blended format but noted challenges with digital tools, and suggested refinements. No significant differences in QST outcomes were observed, likely due to small sample size and inter-individual variability. Individual responses suggested reduced pain inhibition following MIT and enhanced inhibition after HIT.
Conclusions: Both programs were feasible, supporting a larger-scale study to optimize implementation and confirm effects.
{"title":"The influence of a moderate versus high intensity training program on central pain processing: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Amber Billens, Toon Hamelink, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility of two minimally equipped, blended supervised and tele-supported exercise programs, a moderate intensity training (MIT) and high intensity training (HIT) program, in healthy sedentary adults, and explored signals of efficacy on central pain processing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to a 10-week MIT or HIT program, each comprising one supervised group session and two tele-supported home-based sessions per week. MIT involved a Start-to-Run protocol at 60-70% of heart rate reserve, while HIT involved strength exercises at > 80% of predicted maximum heart rate. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessed central pain processing pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were enrolled (8 MIT, 10 HIT). Retention was lower in the MIT group (5 completed) than the HIT group (11 completed), with high adherence in both. Participants appreciated the blended format but noted challenges with digital tools, and suggested refinements. No significant differences in QST outcomes were observed, likely due to small sample size and inter-individual variability. Individual responses suggested reduced pain inhibition following MIT and enhanced inhibition after HIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both programs were feasible, supporting a larger-scale study to optimize implementation and confirm effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrails.gov (ID: NCT06207422).</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: To evaluate patients' pain perception and satisfaction, with ethyl chloride spray compared to placebo during intravenous cannulation.
Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in emergency-observation ward of a tertiary-care-hospital was conducted from February 2023 to January 2024. A total of 417 patients were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 209) or control group (n = 208). Patients underwent intravenous cannulation in antecubital fossa (left/right). Pain perception and patient satisfaction following the use of ethyl-chloride-spray (ECS) compared to placebo, assessed using a 0-10 Verbal-Numeric-Rating-Scale and satisfaction questionnaire. Nurses' satisfaction with ECS and placebo, evaluated by Likert-scale, along with the observation of adverse effects. Final data analyzed using STATA, included 404 participants (202 in each group).
Results: Demographic, clinical profile, and baseline pain perception scores between groups did not show any significant differences. Experimental group reported significantly less pain than control (p < 0.001). Nurses found cannulation easier in 43% of experimental cases versus 33% in controls (p < 0.001). In experimental group, 81% of patients were satisfied and recommended ECS for future use. In both groups, no adverse effects were reported.
Conclusion: Ethyl chloride spray significantly reduced pain perception during intravenous cannulation. High levels of patient satisfaction and nurse endorsement for pain management during IV cannulation.
Clinical trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, identifier is CTRI/2019/09/021285.
{"title":"Effect of ethyl chloride spray on pain, patient & nurse satisfaction, and adverse effects during IV cannulation: randomized control trial.","authors":"Prasuna Jelly, Rakesh Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Sonia Sonia, Suresh K Sharma, Yashwant Singh Payal","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2593226","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2593226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate patients' pain perception and satisfaction, with ethyl chloride spray compared to placebo during intravenous cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in emergency-observation ward of a tertiary-care-hospital was conducted from February 2023 to January 2024. A total of 417 patients were randomly assigned to experimental (<i>n</i> = 209) or control group (<i>n</i> = 208). Patients underwent intravenous cannulation in antecubital fossa (left/right). Pain perception and patient satisfaction following the use of ethyl-chloride-spray (ECS) compared to placebo, assessed using a 0-10 Verbal-Numeric-Rating-Scale and satisfaction questionnaire. Nurses' satisfaction with ECS and placebo, evaluated by Likert-scale, along with the observation of adverse effects. Final data analyzed using STATA, included 404 participants (202 in each group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic, clinical profile, and baseline pain perception scores between groups did not show any significant differences. Experimental group reported significantly less pain than control (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Nurses found cannulation easier in 43% of experimental cases versus 33% in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In experimental group, 81% of patients were satisfied and recommended ECS for future use. In both groups, no adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ethyl chloride spray significantly reduced pain perception during intravenous cannulation. High levels of patient satisfaction and nurse endorsement for pain management during IV cannulation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, identifier is CTRI/2019/09/021285.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145588084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-22DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526
Jacqueline Foong, Gary Price, Anna Baginski, James Lee-Davey, Panayiota Petrochilos
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an inpatient multidisciplinary program for patients diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) presenting with chronic pain.
Methods: Data was obtained from 100 patients with FND who completed a four-week inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) program between 2021 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients presenting with chronic pain as their main symptom and those without predominant pain. The results were also compared to data collected nine years earlier.
Results: FND patients with predominant chronic pain showed significant improvements in ratings on depression and anxiety symptoms, occupational and health status, including pain. Patients without predominant pain also significantly improved in their outcome measures. The extent of overall improvement did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared to earlier data, there was a shift from opiates to increased prescribing of neuropathic pain agents. A significant increase in referrals of FND patients with chronic pain was also observed over time.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FND patients presenting predominantly with chronic pain can benefit from inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Integrating a pain management team, particularly to address opiate medication use, would promote a more cohesive approach to treatment.
{"title":"Chronic pain in Functional Neurological Disorders: clinical outcomes from an inpatient rehabilitation program.","authors":"Jacqueline Foong, Gary Price, Anna Baginski, James Lee-Davey, Panayiota Petrochilos","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an inpatient multidisciplinary program for patients diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) presenting with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was obtained from 100 patients with FND who completed a four-week inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) program between 2021 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients presenting with chronic pain as their main symptom and those without predominant pain. The results were also compared to data collected nine years earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FND patients with predominant chronic pain showed significant improvements in ratings on depression and anxiety symptoms, occupational and health status, including pain. Patients without predominant pain also significantly improved in their outcome measures. The extent of overall improvement did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared to earlier data, there was a shift from opiates to increased prescribing of neuropathic pain agents. A significant increase in referrals of FND patients with chronic pain was also observed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that FND patients presenting predominantly with chronic pain can benefit from inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Integrating a pain management team, particularly to address opiate medication use, would promote a more cohesive approach to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867440/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595
Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.
{"title":"Peripheral nerve stimulation of the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve to treat greater trochanteric pain syndrome.","authors":"Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"87-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591
Ruoxi Cao, Charlene Chin Synn Zhi, Tan Pei Ling
Neuropathic pain is a common but often under-recognized and undertreated complication of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with the potential to significantly hinder rehabilitation. We describe the case of a young man with GBS who developed severe upper limb pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia that were refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin and pharmacologic treatment. The pain caused significant distress and limited therapy participation. A structured trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program, alongside pharmacological analgesia and routine physical therapy - initially administered during a six-week inpatient stay, then independently at home for another six weeks. High-frequency TENS was applied over the contralateral left paraspinal region at C6-T1, targeting the right upper limb. By weeks two and six, the patient demonstrated clinically meaningful pain relief (revised Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire), decreased reliance on analgesics, and improved functional independence (motor Functional Independence Measure). Further gains were observed at 12-week follow-up. TENS was well tolerated with no reported adverse effects. This case highlights the potential role of TENS as a safe, noninvasive adjunct for managing GBS-related neuropathic pain and supporting functional recovery. It may also promote long-term self-management beyond the inpatient setting.
{"title":"Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case report.","authors":"Ruoxi Cao, Charlene Chin Synn Zhi, Tan Pei Ling","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain is a common but often under-recognized and undertreated complication of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with the potential to significantly hinder rehabilitation. We describe the case of a young man with GBS who developed severe upper limb pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia that were refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin and pharmacologic treatment. The pain caused significant distress and limited therapy participation. A structured trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program, alongside pharmacological analgesia and routine physical therapy - initially administered during a six-week inpatient stay, then independently at home for another six weeks. High-frequency TENS was applied over the contralateral left paraspinal region at C6-T1, targeting the right upper limb. By weeks two and six, the patient demonstrated clinically meaningful pain relief (revised Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire), decreased reliance on analgesics, and improved functional independence (motor Functional Independence Measure). Further gains were observed at 12-week follow-up. TENS was well tolerated with no reported adverse effects. This case highlights the potential role of TENS as a safe, noninvasive adjunct for managing GBS-related neuropathic pain and supporting functional recovery. It may also promote long-term self-management beyond the inpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}