首页 > 最新文献

Pain management最新文献

英文 中文
Is TENS an effective physical monotherapy for primary dysmenorrhea? A systematic review and meta-analysis. TENS是治疗原发性痛经的有效物理单一疗法吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2599728
Monika Benduch, Magdalena Stania

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in women with primary dysmenorrhea. We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, and Ovid MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials from inception to 18 December 2024. The risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Of 139 identified records, 9 articles met inclusion criteria, encompassing 530 women with primary dysmenorrhea. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that significantly fewer women required pain medication following TENS compared with placebo (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.63; p < 0.0001; I2 = 37.22%). Analgesia duration was significantly longer after TENS than placebo (MD: 8.07; 95% CI: 8.05 to 8.09; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in pooled menstrual pain intensity (SMD: -4.50; 95% CI: -9.90 to 0.91; p = 0.1) or in the number of women reporting adverse effects (RR: 2.89; 95% CI: 0.40 to 20.88; p = 0.29; I2 = 0%) between TENS and placebo groups. This meta-analysis should be interpreted cautiously due to limited evidence quality and the small number of included studies.Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420251000666.

本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是确定经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗原发性痛经的疗效。我们检索了PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost和Ovid MEDLINE从开始到2024年12月18日的随机对照试验。计算风险比(RR)或95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)。采用I2统计量评估异质性。在139份确定的记录中,9篇文章符合纳入标准,包括530名原发性痛经妇女。中等质量的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,接受TENS治疗后需要止痛药的女性明显减少(RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30 ~ 0.63; p = 37.22%)。TENS组和安慰剂组的镇痛持续时间显著长于安慰剂组(MD: 8.07; 95% CI: 8.05 ~ 8.09; p p = 0.1)或报告不良反应的妇女人数(RR: 2.89; 95% CI: 0.40 ~ 20.88; p = 0.29; I2 = 0%)。由于证据质量有限且纳入的研究数量较少,本荟萃分析应谨慎解读。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD420251000666。
{"title":"Is TENS an effective physical monotherapy for primary dysmenorrhea? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Monika Benduch, Magdalena Stania","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2599728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2599728","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in women with primary dysmenorrhea. We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, and Ovid MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials from inception to 18 December 2024. The risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Of 139 identified records, 9 articles met inclusion criteria, encompassing 530 women with primary dysmenorrhea. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that significantly fewer women required pain medication following TENS compared with placebo (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 37.22%). Analgesia duration was significantly longer after TENS than placebo (MD: 8.07; 95% CI: 8.05 to 8.09; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in pooled menstrual pain intensity (SMD: -4.50; 95% CI: -9.90 to 0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.1) or in the number of women reporting adverse effects (RR: 2.89; 95% CI: 0.40 to 20.88; <i>p</i> = 0.29; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) between TENS and placebo groups. This meta-analysis should be interpreted cautiously due to limited evidence quality and the small number of included studies.<b>Protocol registration</b>: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420251000666.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concomitant use of prescription opioids and psychotropic medications: analysis of Mississippi Medicaid members. 同时使用处方阿片类药物和精神药物:对密西西比州医疗补助计划成员的分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2599727
Arman Arabshomali, Omokhodion Alfred Eriakha, Liang-Yuan Claire Lin, Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Eric Pittman, John P Bentley, Meg Pearson, Anna Kathryn Lambert, E Ashton Smith, Jonathan Hubanks, Dennis R Smith, Sujith Ramachandran

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence and intensity of concomitant opioid and psychotropic medication use in Mississippi Medicaid members.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used Mississippi Medicaid claims from 2016 to 2021 and examined members who filled at least one opioid prescription in a given year. The prevalence and intensity of concomitant opioid-psychotropic use, along with demographic characteristics, chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) diagnoses, mental health diagnoses, and long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) among members were estimated annually.

Results: The eligible sample declined from 82,550 in 2016 to 51,583 in 2021, with CNCP diagnoses at 21% to 24% and LTOT use at 16% to 9%. Concomitant use prevalence was 33.3% in 2016 and 33.8% in 2021, with antidepressants (range: 14.46%-17.04%) and muscle relaxants (range: 13.92%-15.49%) being the most commonly used concomitant medications. Concomitant benzodiazepine use decreased over time (from 9.42% to 3.04%). Concomitant use intensity increased from 76.7% in 2016 to 84.3% in 2021, with mean increases for all studied medications.

Conclusions: Despite reductions in opioid use, the stable prevalence and rising intensity of psychotropic medication overlap highlight a growing reliance on multimodal pharmacologic approaches. These findings underscore the importance of coordinated prescribing, ongoing monitoring, and targeted interventions to mitigate risks in vulnerable populations.

目的:估计密西西比州医疗补助计划成员阿片类药物和精神药物使用的普遍性和强度。方法:这项横断面研究使用了2016年至2021年的密西西比州医疗补助申请,并检查了在给定年份填写至少一种阿片类药物处方的成员。每年评估成员中伴随阿片类精神药物使用的患病率和强度,以及人口统计学特征、慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)诊断、心理健康诊断和长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)。结果:符合条件的样本从2016年的82550例下降到2021年的51583例,CNCP诊断率为21%至24%,LTOT使用率为16%至9%。2016年和2021年的同时使用率分别为33.3%和33.8%,其中抗抑郁药(14.46%-17.04%)和肌肉松弛药(13.92%-15.49%)是最常用的同时使用药物。同时使用苯二氮卓类药物的人数随着时间的推移而下降(从9.42%降至3.04%)。同时使用强度从2016年的76.7%增加到2021年的84.3%,所有研究药物的平均使用强度都有所增加。结论:尽管阿片类药物的使用有所减少,但稳定的流行率和不断上升的精神药物重叠强度突出了对多模式药理学方法的日益依赖。这些发现强调了协调处方、持续监测和有针对性的干预措施对减轻弱势群体风险的重要性。
{"title":"Concomitant use of prescription opioids and psychotropic medications: analysis of Mississippi Medicaid members.","authors":"Arman Arabshomali, Omokhodion Alfred Eriakha, Liang-Yuan Claire Lin, Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Eric Pittman, John P Bentley, Meg Pearson, Anna Kathryn Lambert, E Ashton Smith, Jonathan Hubanks, Dennis R Smith, Sujith Ramachandran","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2599727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2599727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the prevalence and intensity of concomitant opioid and psychotropic medication use in Mississippi Medicaid members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Mississippi Medicaid claims from 2016 to 2021 and examined members who filled at least one opioid prescription in a given year. The prevalence and intensity of concomitant opioid-psychotropic use, along with demographic characteristics, chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) diagnoses, mental health diagnoses, and long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) among members were estimated annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eligible sample declined from 82,550 in 2016 to 51,583 in 2021, with CNCP diagnoses at 21% to 24% and LTOT use at 16% to 9%. Concomitant use prevalence was 33.3% in 2016 and 33.8% in 2021, with antidepressants (range: 14.46%-17.04%) and muscle relaxants (range: 13.92%-15.49%) being the most commonly used concomitant medications. Concomitant benzodiazepine use decreased over time (from 9.42% to 3.04%). Concomitant use intensity increased from 76.7% in 2016 to 84.3% in 2021, with mean increases for all studied medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite reductions in opioid use, the stable prevalence and rising intensity of psychotropic medication overlap highlight a growing reliance on multimodal pharmacologic approaches. These findings underscore the importance of coordinated prescribing, ongoing monitoring, and targeted interventions to mitigate risks in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145715430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intranasal ketamine for chronic cancer-related pain in the outpatient setting: a double-edged sword. 鼻内氯胺酮治疗门诊慢性癌症相关疼痛:双刃剑。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2599730
Joseph Nalbone, Ari Levine, Justine W Welsh, Ali Zarrabi, Vinita Singh

Introduction: Of the 11.9 million Americans living with cancer, 44% experience cancer-related pain. High-dose opioids remain the mainstay of treatment but often reduce quality-of-life (QoL) due to side effect burden, and 40% of patients do not achieve adequate analgesia. Intranasal ketamine offers analgesia without the dose-limiting gastrointestinal or respiratory effects of opioids. It's intranasal formulation allows easier self-administration. This case series highlights the adverse effects of self-administered intranasal ketamine.

Objectives: Describe the impact of self-administered intranasal racemic ketamine on adverse effects, pain intensity, and perceived QoL in patients with cancer-related pain.

Methods: Three patients followed by palliative care and pain medicine services at a tertiary academic center were prescribed intranasal racemic ketamine. Pain scores, opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME), and adverse effect burden were summarized from clinical encounters.

Results: All three patients reported analgesic benefit, including reductions in OME up to 90%. Despite this, each patient developed adverse effects: fatigue, cognitive slowing, and dissociation warranting termination of therapy. Treatment duration ranged from 1 to 8 months with dosing from 50 mg TID to 100 mg QID.

Conclusion: Intranasal ketamine may reduce opioid requirements in cancer-related pain, but adverse effects can limit tolerability. Future research should identify high-risk patients and develop risk mitigation strategies.

在1190万患有癌症的美国人中,44%的人经历着与癌症相关的疼痛。大剂量阿片类药物仍然是主要的治疗方法,但由于副作用负担,往往会降低生活质量(QoL), 40%的患者无法达到充分的镇痛效果。鼻内氯胺酮提供镇痛,但没有阿片类药物的剂量限制胃肠道或呼吸作用。它的鼻内配方使自我给药更容易。本病例系列强调了自我给药鼻内氯胺酮的不良反应。目的:描述自我给药鼻内消旋氯胺酮对癌症相关疼痛患者不良反应、疼痛强度和感知生活质量的影响。方法:在三级学术中心接受姑息治疗和止痛药服务的3例患者给予鼻内消旋氯胺酮处方。从临床遭遇中总结疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗(口服吗啡当量(OME))和不良反应负担。结果:所有3例患者均报告了镇痛益处,包括OME降低高达90%。尽管如此,每个病人都出现了不良反应:疲劳、认知减缓和精神分离,需要终止治疗。治疗持续时间为1至8个月,剂量为50mg TID至100mg QID。结论:鼻内氯胺酮可以减少癌症相关疼痛的阿片类药物需求,但副作用会限制耐受性。未来的研究应确定高危患者并制定风险缓解策略。
{"title":"Intranasal ketamine for chronic cancer-related pain in the outpatient setting: a double-edged sword.","authors":"Joseph Nalbone, Ari Levine, Justine W Welsh, Ali Zarrabi, Vinita Singh","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2599730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2599730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Of the 11.9 million Americans living with cancer, 44% experience cancer-related pain. High-dose opioids remain the mainstay of treatment but often reduce quality-of-life (QoL) due to side effect burden, and 40% of patients do not achieve adequate analgesia. Intranasal ketamine offers analgesia without the dose-limiting gastrointestinal or respiratory effects of opioids. It's intranasal formulation allows easier self-administration. This case series highlights the adverse effects of self-administered intranasal ketamine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe the impact of self-administered intranasal racemic ketamine on adverse effects, pain intensity, and perceived QoL in patients with cancer-related pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients followed by palliative care and pain medicine services at a tertiary academic center were prescribed intranasal racemic ketamine. Pain scores, opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME), and adverse effect burden were summarized from clinical encounters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three patients reported analgesic benefit, including reductions in OME up to 90%. Despite this, each patient developed adverse effects: fatigue, cognitive slowing, and dissociation warranting termination of therapy. Treatment duration ranged from 1 to 8 months with dosing from 50 mg TID to 100 mg QID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intranasal ketamine may reduce opioid requirements in cancer-related pain, but adverse effects can limit tolerability. Future research should identify high-risk patients and develop risk mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145708596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding chronic pain: a mixed-methods study of lifestyle, function, and self-management in adults. 理解慢性疼痛:成人生活方式、功能和自我管理的混合方法研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2599080
Maja Green, Maria Kappell, Shari Kappell, Varun Chakravarthi, Krishnan Chakravarthy

Background: Chronic pain affects nearly one-third of older Australians and is often under-recognised and undertreated, frequently dismissed as normal ageing. Lifestyle and social factors (e.g., inactivity, higher BMI, disadvantage) may intensify pain but are poorly characterised in community samples.

Objective: To estimate chronic pain prevalence, impact, and management in Australian adults and examine associations with personal, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors.

Methods: Thirty-nine adults (19-70 years) completed an online survey on pain features, management, and daily impact. Measures included pain severity, BMI, exercise frequency, and area-level socioeconomic indices (SEIFA). Open-ended survey responses and focus groups were analysed thematically.

Results: Seventy-nine percent reported current pain, affecting activity (59%), mental health (51%), and sleep (41%). Lower BMI and more frequent exercise were associated with lower pain. Socioeconomic indices were not significantly related to pain intensity, although lower-SES participants more often sought formal treatment. Four themes emerged: normalisation of pain, emotional/social burden, self-management, and barriers to care.

Conclusion: Chronic pain was common and linked to modifiable lifestyle patterns, particularly exercise and BMI, but these factors do not fully explain pain experiences. Socioeconomic influences appeared subtle yet may shape care-seeking. Findings support integrated, lifestyle-oriented, multidisciplinary approaches and improved access to early community-based support.

背景:慢性疼痛影响着近三分之一的澳大利亚老年人,并且经常被忽视和治疗不足,经常被认为是正常的衰老。生活方式和社会因素(如缺乏运动、较高的BMI、不利条件)可能加剧疼痛,但在社区样本中特征不明显。目的:评估澳大利亚成年人慢性疼痛的患病率、影响和管理,并研究其与个人、生活方式和社会经济因素的关系。方法:39名成年人(19-70岁)完成了一项关于疼痛特征、管理和日常影响的在线调查。测量包括疼痛严重程度、身体质量指数、运动频率和区域社会经济指数(SEIFA)。对开放式调查答复和焦点小组进行主题分析。结果:79%的人报告当前疼痛,影响活动(59%),精神健康(51%)和睡眠(41%)。较低的身体质量指数和更频繁的运动与较低的疼痛有关。尽管社会经济地位较低的参与者更经常寻求正式治疗,但社会经济指数与疼痛强度没有显著相关性。出现了四个主题:痛苦的正常化、情感/社会负担、自我管理和护理障碍。结论:慢性疼痛很常见,与可改变的生活方式有关,尤其是运动和BMI,但这些因素并不能完全解释疼痛经历。社会经济的影响似乎很微妙,但可能会影响求医。研究结果支持以生活方式为导向的综合多学科方法和改善早期社区支持。
{"title":"Understanding chronic pain: a mixed-methods study of lifestyle, function, and self-management in adults.","authors":"Maja Green, Maria Kappell, Shari Kappell, Varun Chakravarthi, Krishnan Chakravarthy","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2599080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2599080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain affects nearly one-third of older Australians and is often under-recognised and undertreated, frequently dismissed as normal ageing. Lifestyle and social factors (e.g., inactivity, higher BMI, disadvantage) may intensify pain but are poorly characterised in community samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate chronic pain prevalence, impact, and management in Australian adults and examine associations with personal, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine adults (19-70 years) completed an online survey on pain features, management, and daily impact. Measures included pain severity, BMI, exercise frequency, and area-level socioeconomic indices (SEIFA). Open-ended survey responses and focus groups were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine percent reported current pain, affecting activity (59%), mental health (51%), and sleep (41%). Lower BMI and more frequent exercise were associated with lower pain. Socioeconomic indices were not significantly related to pain intensity, although lower-SES participants more often sought formal treatment. Four themes emerged: normalisation of pain, emotional/social burden, self-management, and barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic pain was common and linked to modifiable lifestyle patterns, particularly exercise and BMI, but these factors do not fully explain pain experiences. Socioeconomic influences appeared subtle yet may shape care-seeking. Findings support integrated, lifestyle-oriented, multidisciplinary approaches and improved access to early community-based support.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145708808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral nerve stimulation of the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve to treat greater trochanteric pain syndrome. 外周神经刺激股神经粗隆支治疗大粗隆痛综合征。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595
Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.

大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)是髋关节疼痛的常见原因,通常采用保守治疗,如物理治疗和皮质类固醇注射。然而,有些病例对这些保守治疗没有反应,因此有必要选择其他治疗方法。外周神经刺激(PNS)是一种很有前途的治疗慢性疼痛的方式,可能对GTPS有效。一位71岁女性,BMI为30 kg/m2,慢性左髋关节疼痛超过一年,对保守治疗无反应,接受了针对股神经粗隆分支的临时PNS导联置入。在一周内,她报告疼痛减轻了90%,两个月后改善到95%。她恢复了独立行动能力,提高了生活质量。2个月时,铅被移除,益处持续到24个月。这是首次报道成功的PNS (SPRINT PNS系统,SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US)靶向股神经粗隆分支治疗GTPS的病例。
{"title":"Peripheral nerve stimulation of the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve to treat greater trochanteric pain syndrome.","authors":"Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the effect of Apotel and Ketorolac before surgery on pain and the need for narcotics after abdominal surgery. 术前阿泊特尔与酮罗拉酸对腹部手术后疼痛及麻醉需求的影响比较。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2599733
Samira Sohrabpour, Masoud Saadat Fakhr, Sattar Sohrabpour, Maryam Shieh Morteza, Mahnaz Narimani Zamanabadi

Background: Pain management is critical to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Objective: In this research, the injection of two drugs, Apotel and Ketorolac, as well as the amount of narcotic consumption 24 hours after the operation, were compared to reduce pain after abdominal surgery.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized trial, 128 patients candidates for abdominal surgery were divided into two groups of 64 people, receiving either Apotel or Ketorolac. The intensity of pain (visual analog scale) and the amount of narcotic intake were evaluated in patients after surgery, 6, 12 and 24 hours later. The data was analyzed by SPSS version 26.

Results: Patients who received Apotel reported significantly lower pain scores at 6 hours (p < 0.001) and 24 hours (p < 0.001) after surgery compared to the ketorolac group. The mean 24-hour pain scores were 3.6 in the group receiving Apotel and 4.3 in the group receiving ketorolac. The mean intake of narcotics was also in the group receiving Apotel (51.1 mg) and in the ketorolac group (62.8 mg, p = 0.009).

Conclusion: The administration of Apotel before surgery was associated with more pain relief and less narcotic consumption in patients, and it seems that the use of this drug combination is more effective than the administration of Ketorolac in patients who are candidates for abdominal surgery for postoperative control.Clinical trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier is IRCT20230911059408N1.

背景:疼痛管理是降低死亡率和发病率的关键。目的:本研究比较阿特尔和酮罗拉酸两种药物的注射及术后24小时麻醉用量对减轻腹部手术后疼痛的影响。方法:在这项双盲、随机试验中,128例腹部手术患者被分为两组,每组64人,分别接受Apotel或Ketorolac治疗。分别于术后、术后6、12、24小时评价患者的疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)和麻醉药物的摄入量。数据采用SPSS 26进行分析。结果:与酮洛酸组相比,Apotel组患者在术后6小时(p < 0.001)和24小时(p < 0.001)的疼痛评分明显降低。Apotel组24小时疼痛评分为3.6分,ketorolac组为4.3分。阿泊特尔组和酮咯酸组的平均麻醉品摄入量分别为51.1 mg和62.8 mg, p = 0.009。结论:术前给予Apotel可使患者的疼痛得到更多的缓解,麻醉消耗更少,对于拟进行腹部手术术后控制的患者,联合用药似乎比给予Ketorolac更有效。临床试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心标识为IRCT20230911059408N1。
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of Apotel and Ketorolac before surgery on pain and the need for narcotics after abdominal surgery.","authors":"Samira Sohrabpour, Masoud Saadat Fakhr, Sattar Sohrabpour, Maryam Shieh Morteza, Mahnaz Narimani Zamanabadi","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2599733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2599733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management is critical to reduce mortality and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this research, the injection of two drugs, Apotel and Ketorolac, as well as the amount of narcotic consumption 24 hours after the operation, were compared to reduce pain after abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized trial, 128 patients candidates for abdominal surgery were divided into two groups of 64 people, receiving either Apotel or Ketorolac. The intensity of pain (visual analog scale) and the amount of narcotic intake were evaluated in patients after surgery, 6, 12 and 24 hours later. The data was analyzed by SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received Apotel reported significantly lower pain scores at 6 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 24 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.001) after surgery compared to the ketorolac group. The mean 24-hour pain scores were 3.6 in the group receiving Apotel and 4.3 in the group receiving ketorolac. The mean intake of narcotics was also in the group receiving Apotel (51.1 mg) and in the ketorolac group (62.8 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of Apotel before surgery was associated with more pain relief and less narcotic consumption in patients, and it seems that the use of this drug combination is more effective than the administration of Ketorolac in patients who are candidates for abdominal surgery for postoperative control.<b>Clinical trial registration</b>: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier is IRCT20230911059408N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-acting dexamethasone viscous gel (SP-102) transforaminal injection for lumbosacral radicular pain. 长效地塞米松黏性凝胶(SP-102)经椎间孔注射治疗腰骶神经根性疼痛。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2593224
Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Conor George, Daniela A Ferrer Gonzalez

Lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is a condition characterized by debilitating pain and functional impairment. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are frequently used to relieve symptoms of LRP; there are currently no FDA-approved corticosteroid products specifically indicated for this condition. Moreover, existing products carry safety warnings against epidural administration, which have been linked to the off-label use of formulations. SP-102 (10 mg dexamethasone in a 2 ml viscous gel) is a proposed product that is formulated to provide rapid onset of action while prolonging the duration of effect, potentially resulting in extended pain relief and an improved safety profile for dexamethasone. Phase I and phase II studies have demonstrated SP-102 to be safe and well-tolerated. In phase III, SP-102 demonstrated greater pain relief compared to placebo; SP-102 reduced leg pain scores by an average of 1.1 points more than placebo over four weeks (p < 0.001) and extended the median time before repeat injection to 84 days compared with 58 days for placebo. SP-102 also produced an average 8.9-point reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline versus 5.5 points with placebo (p = 0.015). Importantly, no serious adverse events related to the injection of SP-102 were reported.

腰骶神经根性疼痛(LRP)是一种以衰弱性疼痛和功能损害为特征的疾病。硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)常用于缓解LRP的症状;目前没有fda批准的皮质类固醇产品专门针对这种情况。此外,现有产品带有针对硬膜外给药的安全警告,这与配方的标签外使用有关。SP-102 (10mg地塞米松在2ml粘稠凝胶中)是一种拟议产品,其配方可提供快速起效,同时延长效果持续时间,可能导致延长疼痛缓解和改善地塞米松的安全性。I期和II期研究表明SP-102是安全且耐受性良好的。在III期,与安慰剂相比,SP-102表现出更大的疼痛缓解;SP-102在四周内比安慰剂平均减少了1.1分的腿痛评分(p p = 0.015)。重要的是,没有与SP-102注射相关的严重不良事件的报道。
{"title":"Long-acting dexamethasone viscous gel (SP-102) transforaminal injection for lumbosacral radicular pain.","authors":"Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Conor George, Daniela A Ferrer Gonzalez","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2593224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2593224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is a condition characterized by debilitating pain and functional impairment. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are frequently used to relieve symptoms of LRP; there are currently no FDA-approved corticosteroid products specifically indicated for this condition. Moreover, existing products carry safety warnings against epidural administration, which have been linked to the off-label use of formulations. SP-102 (10 mg dexamethasone in a 2 ml viscous gel) is a proposed product that is formulated to provide rapid onset of action while prolonging the duration of effect, potentially resulting in extended pain relief and an improved safety profile for dexamethasone. Phase I and phase II studies have demonstrated SP-102 to be safe and well-tolerated. In phase III, SP-102 demonstrated greater pain relief compared to placebo; SP-102 reduced leg pain scores by an average of 1.1 points more than placebo over four weeks (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and extended the median time before repeat injection to 84 days compared with 58 days for placebo. SP-102 also produced an average 8.9-point reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline versus 5.5 points with placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.015). Importantly, no serious adverse events related to the injection of SP-102 were reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors associated with nonpharmacological treatment use among older adults with chronic low back pain tapering opioids. 慢性腰痛老年人非药物治疗使用阿片类药物的相关因素。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2567839
Liang-Yuan Lin, Omkar Ghodke, Cynthia Siddiqua, Sonia Eden, Yi Yang, Kaustuv Bhattacharya

Aims: To examine multilevel factors associated with nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) use during opioid tapering among older adults with chronic low back pain (cLBP).

Methods: A cohort study was conducted using 2012-2020 5% national Medicare data. Older adults ≥65 with cLBP who initiated long-term opioid therapy and experienced subsequent tapering were included. The primary outcome was the receipt of NPT within 90 days of tapering. Guided by the social ecological model, predictors were assessed across individual, interpersonal, community, and organizational levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with NPT use.

Results: A total of 10,811 eligible beneficiaries were identified. NPT use was more likely among Asian and female individuals, while those receiving partial low-income subsidies had lower odds. Residing in counties with more mental health providers and social associations was linked to higher NPT use. Prior NPT use, higher baseline opioid dose, rapid tapering, mental health conditions, substance use disorders, additional pain diagnoses, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with increased odds of NPT use.

Conclusion: This study identified key factors affecting NPT use during opioid tapering among older adults with cLBP. Findings underscore the importance of targeted clinical and policy strategies to reduce disparities in NPT access.

目的:研究慢性腰痛(cLBP)老年人阿片类药物逐渐减少期间非药物治疗(NPT)使用相关的多水平因素。方法:采用2012-2020年5%的国家医疗保险数据进行队列研究。年龄≥65岁的cLBP患者开始长期阿片类药物治疗并经历了随后的逐渐减少。主要成果是在缩减后90天内收到NPT。在社会生态模型的指导下,对个体、人际、社区和组织层面的预测因子进行了评估。使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与NPT使用的关系。结果:共确定了10811名符合条件的受益人。亚洲人和女性更有可能使用《不扩散核武器条约》,而那些接受部分低收入补贴的人的可能性较低。居住在拥有更多精神保健提供者和社会协会的县,与NPT使用率较高有关。既往使用非扩散药物、较高的基线阿片类药物剂量、快速减量、精神健康状况、物质使用障碍、额外的疼痛诊断和较高的合并症负担与非扩散药物使用几率增加有关。结论:本研究确定了影响老年cLBP患者阿片类药物减量期间NPT使用的关键因素。研究结果强调了有针对性的临床和政策战略的重要性,以减少不扩散核武器条约获取方面的差距。
{"title":"Factors associated with nonpharmacological treatment use among older adults with chronic low back pain tapering opioids.","authors":"Liang-Yuan Lin, Omkar Ghodke, Cynthia Siddiqua, Sonia Eden, Yi Yang, Kaustuv Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2567839","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2567839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine multilevel factors associated with nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) use during opioid tapering among older adults with chronic low back pain (cLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted using 2012-2020 5% national Medicare data. Older adults ≥65 with cLBP who initiated long-term opioid therapy and experienced subsequent tapering were included. The primary outcome was the receipt of NPT within 90 days of tapering. Guided by the social ecological model, predictors were assessed across individual, interpersonal, community, and organizational levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with NPT use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,811 eligible beneficiaries were identified. NPT use was more likely among Asian and female individuals, while those receiving partial low-income subsidies had lower odds. Residing in counties with more mental health providers and social associations was linked to higher NPT use. Prior NPT use, higher baseline opioid dose, rapid tapering, mental health conditions, substance use disorders, additional pain diagnoses, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with increased odds of NPT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key factors affecting NPT use during opioid tapering among older adults with cLBP. Findings underscore the importance of targeted clinical and policy strategies to reduce disparities in NPT access.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"973-983"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145213434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventional pain management focused on zygapophysial joint pain: current landscape and future perspectives. 关节关节疼痛的介入治疗:现状和未来展望。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2579000
Johan Hambraeus

Chronic pain is one of the main health problems in the world. But managing chronic pain poses special challenges for healthcare. While interventional pain management - especially when focused on zygapophysial joint pain - have been shown to be able to improve health-related quality of life in a cost-effective manner, many European countries have focused on the bio-psychosocial model and pain rehabilitation programs where the general practitioners in primary care gets a subordinate role instead of the leading role they should have. Based on the experience from pain management during the last two decades in Sweden, a program is suggested based on primary care and controlled by the general practitioners and where interventional pain management is integrated early in the process.

慢性疼痛是世界上主要的健康问题之一。但管理慢性疼痛对医疗保健提出了特殊挑战。虽然介入性疼痛管理-特别是当专注于关节关节疼痛时-已被证明能够以具有成本效益的方式改善与健康相关的生活质量,但许多欧洲国家已将重点放在生物-社会心理模型和疼痛康复计划上,在这些计划中,初级保健的全科医生得到了从属角色,而不是他们应该发挥的主导作用。根据瑞典过去二十年来疼痛管理的经验,建议在初级保健的基础上,由全科医生控制,并在早期整合介入性疼痛管理。
{"title":"Interventional pain management focused on zygapophysial joint pain: current landscape and future perspectives.","authors":"Johan Hambraeus","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2579000","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2579000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is one of the main health problems in the world. But managing chronic pain poses special challenges for healthcare. While interventional pain management - especially when focused on zygapophysial joint pain - have been shown to be able to improve health-related quality of life in a cost-effective manner, many European countries have focused on the bio-psychosocial model and pain rehabilitation programs where the general practitioners in primary care gets a subordinate role instead of the leading role they should have. Based on the experience from pain management during the last two decades in Sweden, a program is suggested based on primary care and controlled by the general practitioners and where interventional pain management is integrated early in the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1047-1053"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674287/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What does Dr Google tell us about tendinopathies? An Italian analysis of online content. 关于肌腱病变b谷歌医生告诉了我们什么?意大利在线内容分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2571389
Francesco d'Amone, Ebonie Rio, Massimo Esposto, Charlotte Ganderton, Giacomo Rossettini, Matteo Cioeta

Background: This study aimed to identify the most frequently searched keywords and questions related to the Achilles, knee, shoulder, and elbow tendons in Italy. It further aimed to evaluate the credibility, readability, and content of the most visited web pages.

Methods: Semrush Inc. (2008) machine learning models were used for data mining in December 2024. Credibility and readability of the most visited web pages were assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and Gulpease index, respectively. A content analysis of web pages was used to determine alignment with evidence-based literature.

Results: The most searched question was "How to treat foot tendonitis?" (2,750 searches). Only two web pages (2.2%) were rated as providing unbiased information using the QUEST, with credibility values ranging from 4.0 (±1.6) to 11.4 (±4.0) across all searches. Gulpease indices ranged from 34.0 (±2.1) to 42.8 (±2.9) across all web pages. Notably, content analysis revealed only a small percentage of web pages that aligned to best available evidence.

Conclusion: Credibility, readability, and overall quality of online content on tendons were poor. Healthcare professionals may play a role in promoting accurate terminology and supporting the production of high-quality, evidence-based web page content to improve public health literacy.

背景:本研究旨在确定意大利与跟腱、膝关节、肩关节和肘关节肌腱相关的搜索频率最高的关键词和问题。它进一步旨在评估最常访问的网页的可信度、可读性和内容。方法:Semrush Inc.(2008)的机器学习模型于2024年12月进行数据挖掘。通过质量评价评分工具(QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool, QUEST)和Gulpease指数分别对访问量最大的网页的可信度和可读性进行评估。网页内容分析用于确定与循证文献的一致性。结果:搜索最多的问题是“如何治疗足部肌腱炎?”(2750搜索)。使用QUEST,只有两个网页(2.2%)被评为提供无偏信息,所有搜索的可信度值从4.0(±1.6)到11.4(±4.0)不等。所有网页的Gulpease指数范围为34.0(±2.1)至42.8(±2.9)。值得注意的是,内容分析显示,只有一小部分网页符合现有的最佳证据。结论:跟腱网上内容的可信度、可读性和整体质量较差。医疗保健专业人员可以在促进准确的术语和支持制作高质量、以证据为基础的网页内容方面发挥作用,以提高公众卫生素养。
{"title":"What does Dr Google tell us about tendinopathies? An Italian analysis of online content.","authors":"Francesco d'Amone, Ebonie Rio, Massimo Esposto, Charlotte Ganderton, Giacomo Rossettini, Matteo Cioeta","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2571389","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2571389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to identify the most frequently searched keywords and questions related to the Achilles, knee, shoulder, and elbow tendons in Italy. It further aimed to evaluate the credibility, readability, and content of the most visited web pages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semrush Inc. (2008) machine learning models were used for data mining in December 2024. Credibility and readability of the most visited web pages were assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and Gulpease index, respectively. A content analysis of web pages was used to determine alignment with evidence-based literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most searched question was \"How to treat foot tendonitis?\" (2,750 searches). Only two web pages (2.2%) were rated as providing unbiased information using the QUEST, with credibility values ranging from 4.0 (±1.6) to 11.4 (±4.0) across all searches. Gulpease indices ranged from 34.0 (±2.1) to 42.8 (±2.9) across all web pages. Notably, content analysis revealed only a small percentage of web pages that aligned to best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Credibility, readability, and overall quality of online content on tendons were poor. Healthcare professionals may play a role in promoting accurate terminology and supporting the production of high-quality, evidence-based web page content to improve public health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"985-995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674436/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145239433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1