首页 > 最新文献

Pain management最新文献

英文 中文
Emerging technologies in acute pain management. 急性疼痛管理的新兴技术。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-14 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2631514
Vendhan Ramanujam, Haley Warzecha, Yash Shah, Bijan Moazezi, Benjamin Rapsas, Kelsey Sawyer

Acute pain is a prevalent clinical concern that impacts millions worldwide and often initiates opioid use. Despite advances in multimodal analgesia, challenges such as opioid dependency, under-treatment, and patient heterogeneity persist. This narrative review aims to present recent evidence on emerging technologies in acute pain management, covering innovations in diagnostics, therapeutics, and drug delivery systems. We searched PubMed and Embase databases and included studies from 2015 to 2025 that presented positive evidence of the investigation of these technologies. The review identifies a wide range of emerging tools and interventions, including digital pain assessment scales, wearable biosensors, virtual reality, hypnosis, music therapy, and multimodal distraction. Pharmacological innovations such as sublingual sufentanil, liposomal bupivacaine, Nav 1.8 inhibitors, cebranopadol, and co-crystals of tramadol-celecoxib also show promise. Novel delivery systems - oral patient-controlled analgesics devices, transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl, and bioresorbable nerve stimulators - further enhance individualized pain control. Technological advancements are expanding the toolkit for acute pain management, offering non-opioid, patient-centered, and precision-based alternatives. However, further large-scale and longitudinal studies are required to validate their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.

急性疼痛是一种普遍的临床问题,影响着全世界数百万人,并经常引发阿片类药物的使用。尽管在多模式镇痛方面取得了进展,但阿片类药物依赖、治疗不足和患者异质性等挑战仍然存在。这篇叙述性综述旨在介绍急性疼痛管理中新兴技术的最新证据,包括诊断、治疗和给药系统方面的创新。我们检索了PubMed和Embase数据库,并纳入了2015年至2025年的研究,这些研究提供了这些技术调查的积极证据。该综述确定了广泛的新兴工具和干预措施,包括数字疼痛评估量表、可穿戴生物传感器、虚拟现实、催眠、音乐疗法和多模态分心。诸如舌下舒芬太尼、布比卡因脂质体、Nav 1.8抑制剂、头孢诺帕多和曲马多-塞来昔布共晶体等药理学创新也显示出希望。新型的给药系统——口服病人控制的镇痛装置、经皮离子吸入性芬太尼和生物可吸收的神经刺激剂——进一步增强了个体化疼痛控制。技术进步正在扩大急性疼痛管理的工具包,提供非阿片类药物,以患者为中心和基于精确的替代方案。然而,需要进一步的大规模和纵向研究来验证其在不同患者群体和临床环境中的有效性、安全性和成本效益。
{"title":"Emerging technologies in acute pain management.","authors":"Vendhan Ramanujam, Haley Warzecha, Yash Shah, Bijan Moazezi, Benjamin Rapsas, Kelsey Sawyer","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2631514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2631514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pain is a prevalent clinical concern that impacts millions worldwide and often initiates opioid use. Despite advances in multimodal analgesia, challenges such as opioid dependency, under-treatment, and patient heterogeneity persist. This narrative review aims to present recent evidence on emerging technologies in acute pain management, covering innovations in diagnostics, therapeutics, and drug delivery systems. We searched PubMed and Embase databases and included studies from 2015 to 2025 that presented positive evidence of the investigation of these technologies. The review identifies a wide range of emerging tools and interventions, including digital pain assessment scales, wearable biosensors, virtual reality, hypnosis, music therapy, and multimodal distraction. Pharmacological innovations such as sublingual sufentanil, liposomal bupivacaine, Nav 1.8 inhibitors, cebranopadol, and co-crystals of tramadol-celecoxib also show promise. Novel delivery systems - oral patient-controlled analgesics devices, transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl, and bioresorbable nerve stimulators - further enhance individualized pain control. Technological advancements are expanding the toolkit for acute pain management, offering non-opioid, patient-centered, and precision-based alternatives. However, further large-scale and longitudinal studies are required to validate their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why should we assess and promote the decision-making autonomy of patients suffering from chronic pain? A perspective. 为什么我们要评估和促进慢性疼痛患者的决策自主权?一个透视图。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510
Marguerite d'Ussel, Anne Coutaux, Julien Nizard, Nathan Moreau, Guillaume Durand

Introduction: Chronic pain exerts an enormous personal and economic burden, affecting around 30% of people worldwide yet both patients and providers report low satisfaction with chronic pain care. One of the potential causes stems from insufficient decision-making autonomy in chronic pain patients that hampers their ability to properly get involved in their treatment regimen. Improving said autonomy should thus allow better management in the clinical setting.

Methods: Via a conceptual and philosophical exploration informed by targeted literature, this Perspective examines the role of decision‑making autonomy in the care of patients living with chronic pain, a specific subject that is scarcely addressed in the literature.

Results: In chronic pain, patient autonomy is not only an ethical principle to be respected, but also a competence to foster. Promoting decision-making autonomy can improve pain management by fostering necessary patient empowerment and better involvement in one's treatment regimen.

Discussion: Concepts and specific tools exist that can help clinicians better evaluate and promote patient decision-making autonomy in their pain practice. Future avenues for research are suggested to help ensure that autonomy is better assessed in the clinical setting.

慢性疼痛造成了巨大的个人和经济负担,影响了全世界约30%的人,但患者和提供者对慢性疼痛护理的满意度都很低。其中一个潜在的原因是慢性疼痛患者决策自主权不足,这阻碍了他们正确参与治疗方案的能力。因此,提高这种自主权应该可以在临床环境中进行更好的管理。方法:通过有针对性的文献的概念和哲学探索,本观点探讨了决策自主在慢性疼痛患者护理中的作用,这是一个在文献中几乎没有提到的特定主题。结果:在慢性疼痛治疗中,患者自主不仅是一种需要尊重的伦理原则,而且是一种需要培养的能力。促进决策自主可以通过培养必要的病人授权和更好地参与治疗方案来改善疼痛管理。讨论:现有的概念和具体工具可以帮助临床医生更好地评估和促进患者在疼痛实践中的决策自主权。建议未来的研究途径,以帮助确保自主性在临床环境中得到更好的评估。
{"title":"Why should we assess and promote the decision-making autonomy of patients suffering from chronic pain? A perspective.","authors":"Marguerite d'Ussel, Anne Coutaux, Julien Nizard, Nathan Moreau, Guillaume Durand","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2631510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain exerts an enormous personal and economic burden, affecting around 30% of people worldwide yet both patients and providers report low satisfaction with chronic pain care. One of the potential causes stems from insufficient decision-making autonomy in chronic pain patients that hampers their ability to properly get involved in their treatment regimen. Improving said autonomy should thus allow better management in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via a conceptual and philosophical exploration informed by targeted literature, this Perspective examines the role of decision‑making autonomy in the care of patients living with chronic pain, a specific subject that is scarcely addressed in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In chronic pain, patient autonomy is not only an ethical principle to be respected, but also a competence to foster. Promoting decision-making autonomy can improve pain management by fostering necessary patient empowerment and better involvement in one's treatment regimen.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Concepts and specific tools exist that can help clinicians better evaluate and promote patient decision-making autonomy in their pain practice. Future avenues for research are suggested to help ensure that autonomy is better assessed in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive functional therapy for persistent neck pain. 认知功能疗法治疗持续性颈部疼痛。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646
Siri Bjorland, John Bjørneboe, Cecilie Røe, Mirad Taso, Kaia Engebretsen, Sigrid Skatteboe, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen, Nina Skorge, Jens Ivar Brox

Aims: Persistent neck pain is a leading cause of years lived with disability. The aim of the current study is to describe and evaluate cognitive functional therapy for patients with persistent neck pain.

Methods: We recruited 74 patients (73% women) aged 22-76 years, with persistent neck pain. The outcomes were neck pain at activity and rest measured by 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS), disability by Neck Disability Index (NDI) (0-100), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Hopkin Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) at baseline and post-treatment. The treatment program included 5 sessions and focused on cognitive strategies and exposure to physical activities.

Results: Sixty (81%) patients had follow-ups. Neck pain during activity was reduced by a mean of 3.3 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 3.2) and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.1) at rest. NDI was reduced by 16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5). Similar large improvements were observed for FABQ and HSCL-10. Ninety-eight percent of the participants reported that they would recommend the program to other patients.

Conclusions: Clinically relevant improvements were observed in pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and emotional distress following CFT in patients with persistent neck pain.

目的:持续颈部疼痛是多年残疾生活的主要原因。当前研究的目的是描述和评估认知功能疗法对持续性颈部疼痛患者的治疗效果。方法:我们招募了74例患者(73%为女性),年龄22-76岁,伴有持续性颈部疼痛。结果为活动和休息时颈部疼痛,采用11分数字评定量表(NRS)测量,残疾采用颈部残疾指数(NDI)(0-100),恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ),霍普金症状检查表(HSCL-10)在基线和治疗后测量。治疗方案包括5个疗程,重点是认知策略和接触体育活动。结果:60例(81%)患者随访。活动时颈部疼痛平均减少3.3(95%可信区间(CI) 2.6 - 3.2),休息时颈部疼痛平均减少2.5 (95% CI 1.9 - 3.1)。NDI降低了16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5)。在FABQ和HSCL-10中观察到类似的大改善。98%的参与者报告说,他们会向其他患者推荐这个项目。结论:在持续颈部疼痛患者进行CFT后,观察到疼痛、残疾、恐惧回避信念和情绪困扰的临床相关改善。
{"title":"Cognitive functional therapy for persistent neck pain.","authors":"Siri Bjorland, John Bjørneboe, Cecilie Røe, Mirad Taso, Kaia Engebretsen, Sigrid Skatteboe, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen, Nina Skorge, Jens Ivar Brox","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2625646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Persistent neck pain is a leading cause of years lived with disability. The aim of the current study is to describe and evaluate cognitive functional therapy for patients with persistent neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 74 patients (73% women) aged 22-76 years, with persistent neck pain. The outcomes were neck pain at activity and rest measured by 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS), disability by Neck Disability Index (NDI) (0-100), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Hopkin Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) at baseline and post-treatment. The treatment program included 5 sessions and focused on cognitive strategies and exposure to physical activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty (81%) patients had follow-ups. Neck pain during activity was reduced by a mean of 3.3 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 3.2) and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.1) at rest. NDI was reduced by 16.3 (95% CI 12.0-20.5). Similar large improvements were observed for FABQ and HSCL-10. Ninety-eight percent of the participants reported that they would recommend the program to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically relevant improvements were observed in pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and emotional distress following CFT in patients with persistent neck pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of chronic pain patients at a multidisciplinary spine center. 多学科脊柱中心慢性疼痛患者分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647
Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin

Objective: The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.

Methods: In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (n = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.

Results: At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.

Conclusions: This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.

目的:主要目的是描述到多学科脊柱中心就诊的患者的特征,以了解不同诊断的社会人口统计学特征、疼痛特征和功能状态。次要目的是确定与神经根病患者预后不良相关的因素。方法:在这项基于登记的回顾性队列研究中,我们提取了10069例患者的问卷调查和电子病历数据。基线社会人口学,临床和疼痛相关检查了前10个诊断类别。此后,我们对神经根病患者(n = 653)进行了GLMM随机截距分析,以确定与NRS和promisi - pi变化相关的基线因素。结果:无论诊断如何,患者在入院时均有中度疼痛强度(平均NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), promise - pi(平均:64.6,SD:7.9)和promise - pf(平均:37.7,SD:8.9)明显受损。对神经根病患者的纵向分析发现了多个具有统计学意义的因素(p)。结论:本研究探讨了不良预后的预测因素,可能为针对可改变的危险因素的干预提供了机会,并强调了进一步研究健康差异如何影响治疗结果的必要性。识别无反应者可以通过精确护理改善选择有效的治疗方法,最终降低成本和与慢性疼痛相关的残疾。
{"title":"Analysis of chronic pain patients at a multidisciplinary spine center.","authors":"Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (<i>n</i> = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (<i>p</i> < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ketamine for acute and chronic pain: beyond anaesthesia. 氯胺酮治疗急性和慢性疼痛:超越麻醉。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884
Hao G Duong, Tariq G Pulskamp, Daniel J Berlau

Ketamine's clinical role has expanded beyond anesthesia into a mechanism-based, non-opioid analgesic used across acute, perioperative, and chronic pain settings. As a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ketamine attenuates central sensitization, modulates opioid tolerance, and enhances descending inhibitory control. At subanaesthetic doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg), it consistently reduces pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability. In acute and perioperative care, analgesic efficacy is comparable to opioids, though clear superiority has not been demonstrated. In chronic pain, particularly complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), multi-day infusions provide temporary relief, but durability remains limited. In cancer-related pain, ketamine offers adjuvant benefits for opioid-refractory syndromes with variable outcomes. Short-term adverse effects such as dizziness and mild dysphoria are common, whereas psychomimetic symptoms, hepatobiliary injury, and cystitis restrict prolonged use. Overall, ketamine provides context-dependent, opioid-sparing analgesia with defined but specific clinical utility. Its evolving role in pain management will likely remain targeted, emphasizing patient selection, standardized dosing, and realistic expectations for benefit.

氯胺酮的临床作用已经超越了麻醉,成为一种基于机制的非阿片类镇痛药,用于急性、围手术期和慢性疼痛。作为一种非竞争性n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂,氯胺酮可减轻中枢致敏,调节阿片耐受性,并增强下行抑制控制。在亚麻醉剂量(0.1-0.5 mg/kg)下,它持续降低疼痛评分和术后阿片类药物消耗,同时保持血液动力学和呼吸稳定。在急性期和围手术期护理中,镇痛效果与阿片类药物相当,尽管没有明确的优势。对于慢性疼痛,特别是复杂的局部疼痛综合征(CRPS),多日的输液可以暂时缓解,但持久性仍然有限。在癌症相关疼痛中,氯胺酮为阿片类药物难治综合征提供了不同结果的辅助益处。短期不良反应如头晕和轻度烦躁是常见的,而拟精神病症状、肝胆损伤和膀胱炎限制了长期使用。总的来说,氯胺酮提供情境依赖,阿片类镇痛具有明确但具体的临床用途。它在疼痛管理中不断发展的作用可能仍然是有针对性的,强调病人的选择,标准化的剂量,以及对利益的现实期望。
{"title":"Ketamine for acute and chronic pain: beyond anaesthesia.","authors":"Hao G Duong, Tariq G Pulskamp, Daniel J Berlau","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2627884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketamine's clinical role has expanded beyond anesthesia into a mechanism-based, non-opioid analgesic used across acute, perioperative, and chronic pain settings. As a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ketamine attenuates central sensitization, modulates opioid tolerance, and enhances descending inhibitory control. At subanaesthetic doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg), it consistently reduces pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability. In acute and perioperative care, analgesic efficacy is comparable to opioids, though clear superiority has not been demonstrated. In chronic pain, particularly complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), multi-day infusions provide temporary relief, but durability remains limited. In cancer-related pain, ketamine offers adjuvant benefits for opioid-refractory syndromes with variable outcomes. Short-term adverse effects such as dizziness and mild dysphoria are common, whereas psychomimetic symptoms, hepatobiliary injury, and cystitis restrict prolonged use. Overall, ketamine provides context-dependent, opioid-sparing analgesia with defined but specific clinical utility. Its evolving role in pain management will likely remain targeted, emphasizing patient selection, standardized dosing, and realistic expectations for benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of a moderate versus high intensity training program on central pain processing: a pilot feasibility study. 中等与高强度训练计划对中枢性疼痛处理的影响:一项试点可行性研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256
Amber Billens, Toon Hamelink, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck

Background: This study evaluated the feasibility of two minimally equipped, blended supervised and tele-supported exercise programs, a moderate intensity training (MIT) and high intensity training (HIT) program, in healthy sedentary adults, and explored signals of efficacy on central pain processing.

Methods: Participants were randomized to a 10-week MIT or HIT program, each comprising one supervised group session and two tele-supported home-based sessions per week. MIT involved a Start-to-Run protocol at 60-70% of heart rate reserve, while HIT involved strength exercises at > 80% of predicted maximum heart rate. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessed central pain processing pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Eighteen participants were enrolled (8 MIT, 10 HIT). Retention was lower in the MIT group (5 completed) than the HIT group (11 completed), with high adherence in both. Participants appreciated the blended format but noted challenges with digital tools, and suggested refinements. No significant differences in QST outcomes were observed, likely due to small sample size and inter-individual variability. Individual responses suggested reduced pain inhibition following MIT and enhanced inhibition after HIT.

Conclusions: Both programs were feasible, supporting a larger-scale study to optimize implementation and confirm effects.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrails.gov (ID: NCT06207422).

背景:本研究在久坐不动的健康成人中评估了两种最低装备、混合监督和远程支持的运动方案,即中等强度训练(MIT)和高强度训练(HIT)方案的可行性,并探讨了中枢性疼痛处理的有效性信号。方法:参与者被随机分配到一个为期10周的MIT或HIT项目,每个项目每周包括一个有监督的小组会议和两个远程支持的家庭会议。麻省理工学院在60-70%的心率储备下开始跑步,而哈工大学院在60- 80%的预测最大心率下进行力量训练。可行性结果包括招募、保留、依从性和可接受性。定量感觉测试(QST)评估干预前后的中枢性疼痛处理。结果:共入组18例(MIT 8例,HIT 10例)。MIT组(完成5次)的保留率低于HIT组(完成11次),两者的依从性都很高。与会者对混合形式表示赞赏,但指出了数字工具的挑战,并提出了改进建议。QST结果未观察到显著差异,可能是由于样本量小和个体间差异。个体反应表明,MIT后疼痛抑制减弱,HIT后疼痛抑制增强。结论:两种方案都是可行的,支持进行更大规模的研究以优化实施并确认效果。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrails.gov (ID: NCT06207422)。
{"title":"The influence of a moderate versus high intensity training program on central pain processing: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Amber Billens, Toon Hamelink, Mira Meeus, Jessica Van Oosterwijck","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2626256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility of two minimally equipped, blended supervised and tele-supported exercise programs, a moderate intensity training (MIT) and high intensity training (HIT) program, in healthy sedentary adults, and explored signals of efficacy on central pain processing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to a 10-week MIT or HIT program, each comprising one supervised group session and two tele-supported home-based sessions per week. MIT involved a Start-to-Run protocol at 60-70% of heart rate reserve, while HIT involved strength exercises at > 80% of predicted maximum heart rate. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessed central pain processing pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were enrolled (8 MIT, 10 HIT). Retention was lower in the MIT group (5 completed) than the HIT group (11 completed), with high adherence in both. Participants appreciated the blended format but noted challenges with digital tools, and suggested refinements. No significant differences in QST outcomes were observed, likely due to small sample size and inter-individual variability. Individual responses suggested reduced pain inhibition following MIT and enhanced inhibition after HIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both programs were feasible, supporting a larger-scale study to optimize implementation and confirm effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrails.gov (ID: NCT06207422).</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of ethyl chloride spray on pain, patient & nurse satisfaction, and adverse effects during IV cannulation: randomized control trial. 氯乙酯喷雾剂对静脉留置疼痛、患者和护士满意度及不良反应的影响:随机对照试验。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2593226
Prasuna Jelly, Rakesh Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Sonia Sonia, Suresh K Sharma, Yashwant Singh Payal

Aim: To evaluate patients' pain perception and satisfaction, with ethyl chloride spray compared to placebo during intravenous cannulation.

Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in emergency-observation ward of a tertiary-care-hospital was conducted from February 2023 to January 2024. A total of 417 patients were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 209) or control group (n = 208). Patients underwent intravenous cannulation in antecubital fossa (left/right). Pain perception and patient satisfaction following the use of ethyl-chloride-spray (ECS) compared to placebo, assessed using a 0-10 Verbal-Numeric-Rating-Scale and satisfaction questionnaire. Nurses' satisfaction with ECS and placebo, evaluated by Likert-scale, along with the observation of adverse effects. Final data analyzed using STATA, included 404 participants (202 in each group).

Results: Demographic, clinical profile, and baseline pain perception scores between groups did not show any significant differences. Experimental group reported significantly less pain than control (p < 0.001). Nurses found cannulation easier in 43% of experimental cases versus 33% in controls (p < 0.001). In experimental group, 81% of patients were satisfied and recommended ECS for future use. In both groups, no adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: Ethyl chloride spray significantly reduced pain perception during intravenous cannulation. High levels of patient satisfaction and nurse endorsement for pain management during IV cannulation.

Clinical trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, identifier is CTRI/2019/09/021285.

目的:比较氯乙酯喷雾剂与安慰剂在静脉留置过程中的疼痛感受和满意度。方法:于2023年2月至2024年1月在某三级医院急诊观察病房进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。417例患者随机分为实验组(n = 209)和对照组(n = 208)。患者行肘前窝静脉插管(左/右)。与安慰剂相比,使用乙氯喷雾(ECS)后的疼痛感知和患者满意度,使用0-10语言-数字-评分量表和满意度问卷进行评估。护士对ECS和安慰剂的满意度,采用李克特量表评估,并观察不良反应。使用STATA分析最终数据,包括404名参与者(每组202名)。结果:组间的人口学、临床概况和基线疼痛感知评分无显著差异。结论:氯乙酯喷雾剂可明显减轻静脉置管时的疼痛感。高水平的患者满意度和护士对静脉置管期间疼痛管理的认可。临床试验注册:https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php,标识符为CTRI/2019/09/021285。
{"title":"Effect of ethyl chloride spray on pain, patient & nurse satisfaction, and adverse effects during IV cannulation: randomized control trial.","authors":"Prasuna Jelly, Rakesh Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Sonia Sonia, Suresh K Sharma, Yashwant Singh Payal","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2593226","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2593226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate patients' pain perception and satisfaction, with ethyl chloride spray compared to placebo during intravenous cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in emergency-observation ward of a tertiary-care-hospital was conducted from February 2023 to January 2024. A total of 417 patients were randomly assigned to experimental (<i>n</i> = 209) or control group (<i>n</i> = 208). Patients underwent intravenous cannulation in antecubital fossa (left/right). Pain perception and patient satisfaction following the use of ethyl-chloride-spray (ECS) compared to placebo, assessed using a 0-10 Verbal-Numeric-Rating-Scale and satisfaction questionnaire. Nurses' satisfaction with ECS and placebo, evaluated by Likert-scale, along with the observation of adverse effects. Final data analyzed using STATA, included 404 participants (202 in each group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic, clinical profile, and baseline pain perception scores between groups did not show any significant differences. Experimental group reported significantly less pain than control (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Nurses found cannulation easier in 43% of experimental cases versus 33% in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In experimental group, 81% of patients were satisfied and recommended ECS for future use. In both groups, no adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ethyl chloride spray significantly reduced pain perception during intravenous cannulation. High levels of patient satisfaction and nurse endorsement for pain management during IV cannulation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php, identifier is CTRI/2019/09/021285.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145588084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic pain in Functional Neurological Disorders: clinical outcomes from an inpatient rehabilitation program. 功能性神经系统疾病的慢性疼痛:住院康复计划的临床结果。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526
Jacqueline Foong, Gary Price, Anna Baginski, James Lee-Davey, Panayiota Petrochilos

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an inpatient multidisciplinary program for patients diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) presenting with chronic pain.

Methods: Data was obtained from 100 patients with FND who completed a four-week inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) program between 2021 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients presenting with chronic pain as their main symptom and those without predominant pain. The results were also compared to data collected nine years earlier.

Results: FND patients with predominant chronic pain showed significant improvements in ratings on depression and anxiety symptoms, occupational and health status, including pain. Patients without predominant pain also significantly improved in their outcome measures. The extent of overall improvement did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared to earlier data, there was a shift from opiates to increased prescribing of neuropathic pain agents. A significant increase in referrals of FND patients with chronic pain was also observed over time.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FND patients presenting predominantly with chronic pain can benefit from inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Integrating a pain management team, particularly to address opiate medication use, would promote a more cohesive approach to treatment.

目的:本研究旨在评估多学科住院治疗以慢性疼痛为表现的功能性神经障碍(FND)患者的有效性。方法:数据来自100名FND患者,这些患者在2021年至2023年期间完成了为期四周的住院多学科团队(MDT)计划。临床结果比较以慢性疼痛为主要症状的患者和无主要疼痛的患者。研究结果还与九年前收集的数据进行了比较。结果:以慢性疼痛为主的FND患者在抑郁和焦虑症状、职业和健康状况(包括疼痛)评分方面均有显著改善。无明显疼痛的患者的预后指标也显著改善。整体改善的程度在两组之间没有显著差异。与早期的数据相比,从阿片类药物到神经性止痛药处方的增加有所转变。随着时间的推移,伴有慢性疼痛的FND患者的转诊也显著增加。结论:我们的研究结果表明,主要表现为慢性疼痛的FND患者可以从住院多学科康复中获益。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。整合疼痛管理团队,特别是解决阿片类药物使用问题,将促进更有凝聚力的治疗方法。
{"title":"Chronic pain in Functional Neurological Disorders: clinical outcomes from an inpatient rehabilitation program.","authors":"Jacqueline Foong, Gary Price, Anna Baginski, James Lee-Davey, Panayiota Petrochilos","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2592526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an inpatient multidisciplinary program for patients diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) presenting with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was obtained from 100 patients with FND who completed a four-week inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) program between 2021 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients presenting with chronic pain as their main symptom and those without predominant pain. The results were also compared to data collected nine years earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FND patients with predominant chronic pain showed significant improvements in ratings on depression and anxiety symptoms, occupational and health status, including pain. Patients without predominant pain also significantly improved in their outcome measures. The extent of overall improvement did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared to earlier data, there was a shift from opiates to increased prescribing of neuropathic pain agents. A significant increase in referrals of FND patients with chronic pain was also observed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that FND patients presenting predominantly with chronic pain can benefit from inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Integrating a pain management team, particularly to address opiate medication use, would promote a more cohesive approach to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867440/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral nerve stimulation of the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve to treat greater trochanteric pain syndrome. 外周神经刺激股神经粗隆支治疗大粗隆痛综合征。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595
Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.

大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)是髋关节疼痛的常见原因,通常采用保守治疗,如物理治疗和皮质类固醇注射。然而,有些病例对这些保守治疗没有反应,因此有必要选择其他治疗方法。外周神经刺激(PNS)是一种很有前途的治疗慢性疼痛的方式,可能对GTPS有效。一位71岁女性,BMI为30 kg/m2,慢性左髋关节疼痛超过一年,对保守治疗无反应,接受了针对股神经粗隆分支的临时PNS导联置入。在一周内,她报告疼痛减轻了90%,两个月后改善到95%。她恢复了独立行动能力,提高了生活质量。2个月时,铅被移除,益处持续到24个月。这是首次报道成功的PNS (SPRINT PNS系统,SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US)靶向股神经粗隆分支治疗GTPS的病例。
{"title":"Peripheral nerve stimulation of the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve to treat greater trochanteric pain syndrome.","authors":"Hesham Elsharkawy, Nicolas Mario Mas D Alessandro, Marianne Tanios, Andrew Olsen","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), a common cause of hip pain, is typically managed with conservative treatments such as physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. However, some cases do not respond to these conservative treatments, so alternative therapeutic options become necessary. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising modality for chronic pain management and may be effective for GTPS. A 71-year-old female with a BMI of 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and chronic left hip pain for over a year, unresponsive to conservative treatments, underwent temporary PNS lead placement targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve. Within one week, she reported a 90% reduction in pain, improving to 95% at two months. She regained independent mobility and improved quality of life. Leads were removed at two months, with benefits sustained at 24 months. This is the first reported case of successful PNS (SPRINT PNS System, SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio, US) targeting the trochanteric branch of the femoral nerve for treating GTPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"87-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case report. 经皮神经电刺激治疗格林-巴勒综合征上肢神经性疼痛1例。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591
Ruoxi Cao, Charlene Chin Synn Zhi, Tan Pei Ling

Neuropathic pain is a common but often under-recognized and undertreated complication of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with the potential to significantly hinder rehabilitation. We describe the case of a young man with GBS who developed severe upper limb pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia that were refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin and pharmacologic treatment. The pain caused significant distress and limited therapy participation. A structured trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program, alongside pharmacological analgesia and routine physical therapy - initially administered during a six-week inpatient stay, then independently at home for another six weeks. High-frequency TENS was applied over the contralateral left paraspinal region at C6-T1, targeting the right upper limb. By weeks two and six, the patient demonstrated clinically meaningful pain relief (revised Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire), decreased reliance on analgesics, and improved functional independence (motor Functional Independence Measure). Further gains were observed at 12-week follow-up. TENS was well tolerated with no reported adverse effects. This case highlights the potential role of TENS as a safe, noninvasive adjunct for managing GBS-related neuropathic pain and supporting functional recovery. It may also promote long-term self-management beyond the inpatient setting.

神经性疼痛是格林-巴- 综合征(GBS)的常见并发症,但往往未得到充分认识和治疗,有可能严重阻碍康复。我们描述的情况下,一个年轻的男子与GBS谁发展严重的上肢疼痛,异常性痛觉和痛觉过敏,静脉注射免疫球蛋白和药物治疗难治性。疼痛引起明显的痛苦,限制了治疗的参与。作为多模式康复计划的一部分,引入了经皮神经电刺激(TENS)的结构化试验,以及药物镇痛和常规物理治疗-最初在住院期间进行6周,然后在家中独立进行另外6周。高频TENS应用于对侧左侧C6-T1棘旁区,针对右上肢。到第2周和第6周,患者表现出临床意义上的疼痛缓解(修订的短格式McGill疼痛问卷),对镇痛药的依赖减少,功能独立性改善(运动功能独立性测量)。在12周的随访中观察到进一步的改善。TENS耐受性良好,无不良反应报道。该病例强调了TENS作为一种安全、无创的辅助治疗gbs相关神经性疼痛和支持功能恢复的潜在作用。它还可以促进住院病人之外的长期自我管理。
{"title":"Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case report.","authors":"Ruoxi Cao, Charlene Chin Synn Zhi, Tan Pei Ling","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2591591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain is a common but often under-recognized and undertreated complication of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with the potential to significantly hinder rehabilitation. We describe the case of a young man with GBS who developed severe upper limb pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia that were refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin and pharmacologic treatment. The pain caused significant distress and limited therapy participation. A structured trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program, alongside pharmacological analgesia and routine physical therapy - initially administered during a six-week inpatient stay, then independently at home for another six weeks. High-frequency TENS was applied over the contralateral left paraspinal region at C6-T1, targeting the right upper limb. By weeks two and six, the patient demonstrated clinically meaningful pain relief (revised Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire), decreased reliance on analgesics, and improved functional independence (motor Functional Independence Measure). Further gains were observed at 12-week follow-up. TENS was well tolerated with no reported adverse effects. This case highlights the potential role of TENS as a safe, noninvasive adjunct for managing GBS-related neuropathic pain and supporting functional recovery. It may also promote long-term self-management beyond the inpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1