医院服务水平、城乡位置和新生儿复苏干预:2000-2020年加拿大阿尔伯塔省人口研究

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110497
Breanna Pickett, Susan Crawford, Deborah McNeil, Georg M Schmölzer, Amuchou Soraisham, Bo Pan, Heather Shonoski, Khalid Aziz, Brenda Hiu Yan Law
{"title":"医院服务水平、城乡位置和新生儿复苏干预:2000-2020年加拿大阿尔伯塔省人口研究","authors":"Breanna Pickett, Susan Crawford, Deborah McNeil, Georg M Schmölzer, Amuchou Soraisham, Bo Pan, Heather Shonoski, Khalid Aziz, Brenda Hiu Yan Law","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Advanced neonatal resuscitation interventions (ANRIs) are rarely performed for late preterm and term infants. However, healthcare providers in community hospitals may need to perform ANRIs, while having limited experience and resources. Understanding practice differences between hospitals of different levels of service (LoS) and rural/urban location may inform quality improvement. Our objective are to a) examine how hospital LoS and rural/urban location relate to ANRI rates in Alberta, Canada, a public health system with standardized Neonatal Resuscitation Program® training and b) describe trends in neonatal resuscitation interventions and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>All live births ≥ 34 weeks in Alberta from 2000 to 2020 were examined using retrospective, administrative data. Hospitals (n = 97) were categorized based on availability of delivery support, cesarian sections, pediatricians/obstetricians, and NICUs, then subcategorized by population and proximity to metropolitan centres. Rates of individual interventions or any ANRI were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>966,475 births were included. ANRI rates were: intubation for ventilation (0.8%), chest compression (0.2%), epinephrine (0.02%), any ANRI (0.95%). While ANRIs were lower in community hospitals and home births, with lower hospital level of service, intubation rates decreased and chest compressions rates increased. Level 1A (OR:4.52, 95% CI 3.59-5.62) and home births (OR:3.09, 95% CI 2.52-3.76) had much higher odds of chest compressions. No pattern was observed between rural/remote sites of similar LoS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this population study, there were higher chest compressions rates and lower intubation rates at hospitals without NICUs, despite standardized training. Reasons for this difference require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110497"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital level of service, rural-urban location, and neonatal resuscitation interventions: A population study in Alberta Canada from 2000 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Breanna Pickett, Susan Crawford, Deborah McNeil, Georg M Schmölzer, Amuchou Soraisham, Bo Pan, Heather Shonoski, Khalid Aziz, Brenda Hiu Yan Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Advanced neonatal resuscitation interventions (ANRIs) are rarely performed for late preterm and term infants. However, healthcare providers in community hospitals may need to perform ANRIs, while having limited experience and resources. Understanding practice differences between hospitals of different levels of service (LoS) and rural/urban location may inform quality improvement. Our objective are to a) examine how hospital LoS and rural/urban location relate to ANRI rates in Alberta, Canada, a public health system with standardized Neonatal Resuscitation Program® training and b) describe trends in neonatal resuscitation interventions and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>All live births ≥ 34 weeks in Alberta from 2000 to 2020 were examined using retrospective, administrative data. Hospitals (n = 97) were categorized based on availability of delivery support, cesarian sections, pediatricians/obstetricians, and NICUs, then subcategorized by population and proximity to metropolitan centres. Rates of individual interventions or any ANRI were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>966,475 births were included. ANRI rates were: intubation for ventilation (0.8%), chest compression (0.2%), epinephrine (0.02%), any ANRI (0.95%). While ANRIs were lower in community hospitals and home births, with lower hospital level of service, intubation rates decreased and chest compressions rates increased. Level 1A (OR:4.52, 95% CI 3.59-5.62) and home births (OR:3.09, 95% CI 2.52-3.76) had much higher odds of chest compressions. No pattern was observed between rural/remote sites of similar LoS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this population study, there were higher chest compressions rates and lower intubation rates at hospitals without NICUs, despite standardized training. Reasons for this difference require further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110497\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:晚期新生儿复苏干预(ANRIs)很少用于晚期早产儿和足月婴儿。然而,社区医院的医疗保健提供者可能需要执行ANRIs,而经验和资源有限。了解不同服务水平的医院(LoS)和农村/城市位置之间的实践差异可以为质量改进提供信息。我们的目标是a)研究加拿大阿尔伯塔省(一个具有标准化新生儿复苏计划®培训的公共卫生系统)的医院LoS和农村/城市位置与ANRI率之间的关系;b)描述新生儿复苏干预措施和结果的趋势。方法/设计:采用回顾性、行政数据对2000-2020年艾伯塔省所有≥34周的活产婴儿进行调查。医院(n=97)根据分娩支持、剖宫产、儿科/产科医生和新生儿重症监护病房的可用性进行分类,然后按人口和距离大都市中心的远近进行分类。比较了个体干预或任何ANRI的比率。结果:共纳入966,475例新生儿。ANRI率为:插管通气(0.8%),胸外按压(0.2%),肾上腺素(0.02%),任何ANRI(0.95%)。虽然社区医院和家庭分娩的ANRIs较低,但随着医院服务水平的降低,插管率下降,胸外按压率上升。1A级(OR:4.52, 95% CI 3.59-5.62)和家庭分娩(OR:3.09, 95% CI 2.52-3.76)发生胸外按压的几率要高得多。在农村/偏远地区没有观察到类似LoS的模式。结论:在本人群研究中,尽管进行了标准化培训,但在没有新生儿重症监护病房的医院,胸外按压率较高,插管率较低。造成这种差异的原因需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital level of service, rural-urban location, and neonatal resuscitation interventions: A population study in Alberta Canada from 2000 to 2020.

Background and objectives: Advanced neonatal resuscitation interventions (ANRIs) are rarely performed for late preterm and term infants. However, healthcare providers in community hospitals may need to perform ANRIs, while having limited experience and resources. Understanding practice differences between hospitals of different levels of service (LoS) and rural/urban location may inform quality improvement. Our objective are to a) examine how hospital LoS and rural/urban location relate to ANRI rates in Alberta, Canada, a public health system with standardized Neonatal Resuscitation Program® training and b) describe trends in neonatal resuscitation interventions and outcomes.

Methods/design: All live births ≥ 34 weeks in Alberta from 2000 to 2020 were examined using retrospective, administrative data. Hospitals (n = 97) were categorized based on availability of delivery support, cesarian sections, pediatricians/obstetricians, and NICUs, then subcategorized by population and proximity to metropolitan centres. Rates of individual interventions or any ANRI were compared.

Results: 966,475 births were included. ANRI rates were: intubation for ventilation (0.8%), chest compression (0.2%), epinephrine (0.02%), any ANRI (0.95%). While ANRIs were lower in community hospitals and home births, with lower hospital level of service, intubation rates decreased and chest compressions rates increased. Level 1A (OR:4.52, 95% CI 3.59-5.62) and home births (OR:3.09, 95% CI 2.52-3.76) had much higher odds of chest compressions. No pattern was observed between rural/remote sites of similar LoS.

Conclusions: In this population study, there were higher chest compressions rates and lower intubation rates at hospitals without NICUs, despite standardized training. Reasons for this difference require further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Management of Acute Hyperkalemia: Where's the Data Behind the Old Dogma? Corrigendum to "Cost of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors compared with matched control groups" [Resuscitation 199 (2024) 1-10]. Defibrillation Energy Levels in OHCA: Rethinking Assumptions and Exploring New Insights. Extra Corporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A cost of living crisis? Learn to Drive, Learn CPR: Advancing road safety and life-saving skills across Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1