语言和注意网络在强化综合失语训练后的语言改善中有不同的作用。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047683
Evan Houldin, Edna M Babbitt, Rosalind Hurwitz, Marwan N Baliki, Leora R Cherney
{"title":"语言和注意网络在强化综合失语训练后的语言改善中有不同的作用。","authors":"Evan Houldin, Edna M Babbitt, Rosalind Hurwitz, Marwan N Baliki, Leora R Cherney","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention is known to play an important role in language, and attentional deficits have been associated with language impairments in people with aphasia (PWA). A prior study by our laboratory indicated that behavioral measures for PWA participating in an intensive comprehensive aphasia program (ICAP) clustered into 1 language and 1 attention-related factor, with each factor correlated with independent resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) networks. The present study includes additional attention measures and participants to better assess the relationship between attention, language, and rsFC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PWA participated in 120 hours of ICAP therapy over 4 weeks, between April 2018 and August 2022. Participants were evaluated with the Western Aphasia Battery and Conners' Continuous Performance Test, pre- and post-ICAP. rsFC data were collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging scans pre- and post-ICAP. Principal component analysis identified behavioral score associations pre- and post-ICAP. FC matrices and graph measures were evaluated for both PWA and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three PWA participated (19 included in the final analysis). Data for 179 age and sex-matched healthy controls were taken from a public data set. The principal component analysis indicated 1 language and 2 attention-related principal components (PCs). The attention PCs were labeled Attention Accuracy and Attention Rate, in accordance with their best-associated behavioral measures. Importantly, each PC was associated with distinct networks, including higher-order networks, so-called because of their involvement in higher-order cognition. Notably, the language PC was significantly correlated with the ventral attention-memory-retrieval network rsFC (<i>r</i>=0.67, <i>P</i>=0.003) and the default mode-frontoparietal network rsFC (<i>r</i>=-0.56, <i>P</i>=0.019). Attention Accuracy was significantly correlated with cingulo-opercular-subcortical network rsFC (<i>r</i>=0.60, <i>P</i>=0.011). Attention Rate was significantly negatively correlated with visual-somatomotor network rsFC (<i>r</i>=-0.74, <i>P</i>=0.0007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the notion that language improvements for PWAs participating in an ICAP are associated with distinct network changes. Importantly, these networks are not restricted to language networks but also include attention, and task-control networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language and Attention Networks Have Distinct Roles in Language Improvement Following an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Houldin, Edna M Babbitt, Rosalind Hurwitz, Marwan N Baliki, Leora R Cherney\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention is known to play an important role in language, and attentional deficits have been associated with language impairments in people with aphasia (PWA). A prior study by our laboratory indicated that behavioral measures for PWA participating in an intensive comprehensive aphasia program (ICAP) clustered into 1 language and 1 attention-related factor, with each factor correlated with independent resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) networks. The present study includes additional attention measures and participants to better assess the relationship between attention, language, and rsFC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PWA participated in 120 hours of ICAP therapy over 4 weeks, between April 2018 and August 2022. Participants were evaluated with the Western Aphasia Battery and Conners' Continuous Performance Test, pre- and post-ICAP. rsFC data were collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging scans pre- and post-ICAP. Principal component analysis identified behavioral score associations pre- and post-ICAP. FC matrices and graph measures were evaluated for both PWA and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three PWA participated (19 included in the final analysis). Data for 179 age and sex-matched healthy controls were taken from a public data set. The principal component analysis indicated 1 language and 2 attention-related principal components (PCs). The attention PCs were labeled Attention Accuracy and Attention Rate, in accordance with their best-associated behavioral measures. Importantly, each PC was associated with distinct networks, including higher-order networks, so-called because of their involvement in higher-order cognition. Notably, the language PC was significantly correlated with the ventral attention-memory-retrieval network rsFC (<i>r</i>=0.67, <i>P</i>=0.003) and the default mode-frontoparietal network rsFC (<i>r</i>=-0.56, <i>P</i>=0.019). Attention Accuracy was significantly correlated with cingulo-opercular-subcortical network rsFC (<i>r</i>=0.60, <i>P</i>=0.011). Attention Rate was significantly negatively correlated with visual-somatomotor network rsFC (<i>r</i>=-0.74, <i>P</i>=0.0007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the notion that language improvements for PWAs participating in an ICAP are associated with distinct network changes. Importantly, these networks are not restricted to language networks but also include attention, and task-control networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047683\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047683","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:注意力在语言中起着重要的作用,并且注意力缺陷与失语症(PWA)患者的语言障碍有关。本实验室先前的研究表明,参加强化综合失语项目(ICAP)的PWA的行为测量聚集为1个语言和1个注意相关因素,每个因素都与独立静息状态功能连接(rsFC)网络相关。本研究包括额外的注意测量和参与者,以更好地评估注意、语言和rsFC之间的关系。方法:PWA在2018年4月至2022年8月期间参加了为期4周的120小时ICAP治疗。在icap之前和之后,对参与者进行了西方失语测试和康纳斯连续表现测试。在icap前后的功能磁共振成像扫描中收集rsFC数据。主成分分析确定了icap前后行为评分的关联。对PWA和健康对照组的FC矩阵和图形测量进行了评估。结果:共有23例PWA参与,其中19例纳入最终分析。179名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者的数据来自一个公共数据集。主成分分析显示语言相关主成分有1个,注意相关主成分有2个。注意pc被标记为注意准确性和注意率,按照他们最好的相关行为测量。重要的是,每台PC都与不同的网络相关联,包括高阶网络,因为它们参与高阶认知而被称为高阶网络。语言PC与腹侧注意-记忆检索网络rsFC (r=0.67, P=0.003)和默认模式-额顶叶网络rsFC (r=-0.56, P=0.019)显著相关。注意正确率与扣谷-眶-皮层下网络rsFC显著相关(r=0.60, P=0.011)。注意率与视觉-躯体运动网络rsFC呈显著负相关(r=-0.74, P=0.0007)。结论:本研究支持这样一种观点,即参与ICAP的pwa的语言改善与明显的网络变化有关。重要的是,这些网络并不局限于语言网络,还包括注意力和任务控制网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language and Attention Networks Have Distinct Roles in Language Improvement Following an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program.

Background: Attention is known to play an important role in language, and attentional deficits have been associated with language impairments in people with aphasia (PWA). A prior study by our laboratory indicated that behavioral measures for PWA participating in an intensive comprehensive aphasia program (ICAP) clustered into 1 language and 1 attention-related factor, with each factor correlated with independent resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) networks. The present study includes additional attention measures and participants to better assess the relationship between attention, language, and rsFC.

Methods: PWA participated in 120 hours of ICAP therapy over 4 weeks, between April 2018 and August 2022. Participants were evaluated with the Western Aphasia Battery and Conners' Continuous Performance Test, pre- and post-ICAP. rsFC data were collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging scans pre- and post-ICAP. Principal component analysis identified behavioral score associations pre- and post-ICAP. FC matrices and graph measures were evaluated for both PWA and healthy controls.

Results: Twenty-three PWA participated (19 included in the final analysis). Data for 179 age and sex-matched healthy controls were taken from a public data set. The principal component analysis indicated 1 language and 2 attention-related principal components (PCs). The attention PCs were labeled Attention Accuracy and Attention Rate, in accordance with their best-associated behavioral measures. Importantly, each PC was associated with distinct networks, including higher-order networks, so-called because of their involvement in higher-order cognition. Notably, the language PC was significantly correlated with the ventral attention-memory-retrieval network rsFC (r=0.67, P=0.003) and the default mode-frontoparietal network rsFC (r=-0.56, P=0.019). Attention Accuracy was significantly correlated with cingulo-opercular-subcortical network rsFC (r=0.60, P=0.011). Attention Rate was significantly negatively correlated with visual-somatomotor network rsFC (r=-0.74, P=0.0007).

Conclusions: This study supports the notion that language improvements for PWAs participating in an ICAP are associated with distinct network changes. Importantly, these networks are not restricted to language networks but also include attention, and task-control networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Speech Therapy Combined With Cerebrolysin in Enhancing Nonfluent Aphasia Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: ESCAS Randomized Pilot Study. Comparison of Noncontrast Computed Tomography, Multiphase Computed Tomography Angiography, and Computed Tomography Perfusion to Assess Infarct Growth Rate in Acute Stroke. Three-Dimensional Curvature of the Cervical Carotid Artery Predicts Long-Term Neurovascular Risk in Loeys-Dietz Syndrome. Bridging the Gap: Training and Infrastructure Solutions for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Requiring an Interpreter Influences Stroke Care and Outcomes for People With Aphasia During Inpatient Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1