四倍体F1群体分离畸变试验。

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Theoretical and Applied Genetics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s00122-025-04816-z
David Gerard, Mira Thakkar, Luis Felipe V Ferrão
{"title":"四倍体F1群体分离畸变试验。","authors":"David Gerard, Mira Thakkar, Luis Felipe V Ferrão","doi":"10.1007/s00122-025-04816-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key message: </strong>In tetraploid F1 populations, traditional segregation distortion tests often inaccurately flag SNPs due to ignoring polyploid meiosis processes and genotype uncertainty. We develop tests that account for these factors. Genotype data from tetraploid F1 populations are often collected in breeding programs for mapping and genomic selection purposes. A common quality control procedure in these groups is to compare empirical genotype frequencies against those predicted by Mendelian segregation, where SNPs detected to have segregation distortion are discarded. However, current tests for segregation distortion are insufficient in that they do not account for double reduction and preferential pairing, two meiotic processes in polyploids that naturally change gamete frequencies, leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Current tests also do not account for genotype uncertainty, again leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Here, we incorporate double reduction, preferential pairing, and genotype uncertainty in likelihood ratio and Bayesian tests for segregation distortion. Our methods are implemented in a user-friendly R package, menbayes. We demonstrate the superiority of our methods to those currently used in the literature on both simulations and real data.</p>","PeriodicalId":22955,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Genetics","volume":"138 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tests for segregation distortion in tetraploid F1 populations.\",\"authors\":\"David Gerard, Mira Thakkar, Luis Felipe V Ferrão\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00122-025-04816-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Key message: </strong>In tetraploid F1 populations, traditional segregation distortion tests often inaccurately flag SNPs due to ignoring polyploid meiosis processes and genotype uncertainty. We develop tests that account for these factors. Genotype data from tetraploid F1 populations are often collected in breeding programs for mapping and genomic selection purposes. A common quality control procedure in these groups is to compare empirical genotype frequencies against those predicted by Mendelian segregation, where SNPs detected to have segregation distortion are discarded. However, current tests for segregation distortion are insufficient in that they do not account for double reduction and preferential pairing, two meiotic processes in polyploids that naturally change gamete frequencies, leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Current tests also do not account for genotype uncertainty, again leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Here, we incorporate double reduction, preferential pairing, and genotype uncertainty in likelihood ratio and Bayesian tests for segregation distortion. Our methods are implemented in a user-friendly R package, menbayes. We demonstrate the superiority of our methods to those currently used in the literature on both simulations and real data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Applied Genetics\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Applied Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-025-04816-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-025-04816-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键信息:在四倍体F1群体中,由于忽略了多倍体减数分裂过程和基因型的不确定性,传统的分离扭曲测试往往不能准确地标记SNPs。我们开发测试来解释这些因素。来自四倍体F1群体的基因型数据通常在育种计划中收集,用于定位和基因组选择目的。在这些群体中,一个常见的质量控制程序是将经验基因型频率与孟德尔分离预测的频率进行比较,在孟德尔分离中,检测到有分离失真的snp被丢弃。然而,目前对分离畸变的测试是不够的,因为它们没有考虑到双重还原和优先配对,这是多倍体中自然改变配子频率的两个减数分裂过程,导致这些测试经常检测到分离畸变。目前的测试也没有考虑到基因型的不确定性,这再次导致这些测试过于频繁地检测分离扭曲。在这里,我们结合了双重还原,优先配对,基因型不确定性的似然比和贝叶斯检验分离失真。我们的方法是在一个用户友好的R包menbayes中实现的。我们在模拟和真实数据上证明了我们的方法比目前文献中使用的方法的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tests for segregation distortion in tetraploid F1 populations.

Key message: In tetraploid F1 populations, traditional segregation distortion tests often inaccurately flag SNPs due to ignoring polyploid meiosis processes and genotype uncertainty. We develop tests that account for these factors. Genotype data from tetraploid F1 populations are often collected in breeding programs for mapping and genomic selection purposes. A common quality control procedure in these groups is to compare empirical genotype frequencies against those predicted by Mendelian segregation, where SNPs detected to have segregation distortion are discarded. However, current tests for segregation distortion are insufficient in that they do not account for double reduction and preferential pairing, two meiotic processes in polyploids that naturally change gamete frequencies, leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Current tests also do not account for genotype uncertainty, again leading these tests to detect segregation distortion too often. Here, we incorporate double reduction, preferential pairing, and genotype uncertainty in likelihood ratio and Bayesian tests for segregation distortion. Our methods are implemented in a user-friendly R package, menbayes. We demonstrate the superiority of our methods to those currently used in the literature on both simulations and real data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Genetics publishes original research and review articles in all key areas of modern plant genetics, plant genomics and plant biotechnology. All work needs to have a clear genetic component and significant impact on plant breeding. Theoretical considerations are only accepted in combination with new experimental data and/or if they indicate a relevant application in plant genetics or breeding. Emphasizing the practical, the journal focuses on research into leading crop plants and articles presenting innovative approaches.
期刊最新文献
BrCYP71 mutation resulted in stay-green in pak choi (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis). Comparative genomic prediction of resistance to Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2) in watermelon: parametric and nonparametric approaches. Analysis of the genetic basis of fiber-related traits and flowering time in upland cotton using machine learning. Genetic dissection of foxtail millet bristles using combined QTL mapping and RNA-seq. Genomic selection shows improved expected genetic gain over phenotypic selection of agronomic traits in allotetraploid white clover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1