神经危重症患者肺栓塞与下肢深静脉血栓的关系。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123683
Yusuf Mufti, Abram Qiu, Jacob Chmielecki, Abdallah Maach, Geoffrey Peitz
{"title":"神经危重症患者肺栓塞与下肢深静脉血栓的关系。","authors":"Yusuf Mufti, Abram Qiu, Jacob Chmielecki, Abdallah Maach, Geoffrey Peitz","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients in the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulation is often indicated because deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can develop into pulmonary embolism (PE). However, anticoagulation also increases the risk of intracranial bleeding. Physicians must weigh the opposing risks carefully. It is commonly believed that upper extremity DVT (UEDVT) is less likely to develop into PE as compared to lower extremity DVT (LEDVT), but this lacks evidence, and our study investigates its validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients admitted to a neurological ICU from 2017 to 2022 and developed VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 2,891 patients and 97 patients met study criteria. VTE occurred in 3.55% of patients, DVT in 2.63%, and PE in 0.96%. Of the recorded DVTs, 52.3% were in the upper extremities, 42.3% in the lower extremities, and 6.4% in both. PE rate was not significantly different in patients with UEDVT than in those with LEDVT (p = 0.233). Cather-associated DVT was more common in the upper extremities (p=0.002), but the PE rate was no different in catheter-associated DVT than non-catheter-associated DVT (p=0.193). The proportion of patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation was not significantly different between patients with UEDVT alone and those with LEDVT (p=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of neurocritical care patients, the coexistence of DVT and PE did not differ in patients with upper versus lower extremity DVT. This should be considered in the neurocritical care unit when deciding whether to treat patients with DVT with anticoagulants.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Upper or Lower Extremities in Neurocritical Care Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Mufti, Abram Qiu, Jacob Chmielecki, Abdallah Maach, Geoffrey Peitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients in the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulation is often indicated because deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can develop into pulmonary embolism (PE). However, anticoagulation also increases the risk of intracranial bleeding. Physicians must weigh the opposing risks carefully. It is commonly believed that upper extremity DVT (UEDVT) is less likely to develop into PE as compared to lower extremity DVT (LEDVT), but this lacks evidence, and our study investigates its validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients admitted to a neurological ICU from 2017 to 2022 and developed VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 2,891 patients and 97 patients met study criteria. VTE occurred in 3.55% of patients, DVT in 2.63%, and PE in 0.96%. Of the recorded DVTs, 52.3% were in the upper extremities, 42.3% in the lower extremities, and 6.4% in both. PE rate was not significantly different in patients with UEDVT than in those with LEDVT (p = 0.233). Cather-associated DVT was more common in the upper extremities (p=0.002), but the PE rate was no different in catheter-associated DVT than non-catheter-associated DVT (p=0.193). The proportion of patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation was not significantly different between patients with UEDVT alone and those with LEDVT (p=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of neurocritical care patients, the coexistence of DVT and PE did not differ in patients with upper versus lower extremity DVT. This should be considered in the neurocritical care unit when deciding whether to treat patients with DVT with anticoagulants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经重症监护病房(ICU)的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。由于深静脉血栓形成(DVT)可发展为肺栓塞(PE),因此经常需要抗凝治疗。然而,抗凝也会增加颅内出血的风险。医生必须仔细权衡相反的风险。通常认为上肢DVT (UEDVT)比下肢DVT (LEDVT)更不容易发展为PE,但缺乏证据,本研究对其有效性进行了调查。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2022年神经内科ICU收治的静脉血栓栓塞患者。结果:我们回顾了2891例患者,其中97例符合研究标准。VTE发生率为3.55%,DVT发生率为2.63%,PE发生率为0.96%。在记录的dvt中,52.3%发生在上肢,42.3%发生在下肢,6.4%发生在两肢。UEDVT患者PE率与LEDVT患者PE率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.233)。导管相关DVT在上肢更常见(p=0.002),但导管相关DVT的PE率与非导管相关DVT没有差异(p=0.193)。单纯UEDVT患者与LEDVT患者接受治疗性抗凝治疗的患者比例差异无统计学意义(p=1.000)。结论:在这组神经危重症患者样本中,上肢和下肢DVT患者DVT和PE共存的情况没有差异。在决定是否用抗凝剂治疗深静脉血栓患者时,神经危重症监护病房应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association Between Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Upper or Lower Extremities in Neurocritical Care Patients.

Introduction: Patients in the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulation is often indicated because deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can develop into pulmonary embolism (PE). However, anticoagulation also increases the risk of intracranial bleeding. Physicians must weigh the opposing risks carefully. It is commonly believed that upper extremity DVT (UEDVT) is less likely to develop into PE as compared to lower extremity DVT (LEDVT), but this lacks evidence, and our study investigates its validity.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients admitted to a neurological ICU from 2017 to 2022 and developed VTE.

Results: We reviewed 2,891 patients and 97 patients met study criteria. VTE occurred in 3.55% of patients, DVT in 2.63%, and PE in 0.96%. Of the recorded DVTs, 52.3% were in the upper extremities, 42.3% in the lower extremities, and 6.4% in both. PE rate was not significantly different in patients with UEDVT than in those with LEDVT (p = 0.233). Cather-associated DVT was more common in the upper extremities (p=0.002), but the PE rate was no different in catheter-associated DVT than non-catheter-associated DVT (p=0.193). The proportion of patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation was not significantly different between patients with UEDVT alone and those with LEDVT (p=1.000).

Conclusion: In this sample of neurocritical care patients, the coexistence of DVT and PE did not differ in patients with upper versus lower extremity DVT. This should be considered in the neurocritical care unit when deciding whether to treat patients with DVT with anticoagulants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Hemorrhagic Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation: Microelectrode Recording versus Macrostimulation-Does the Technique Matter? Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Model for Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Interventional Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms. Reduced Vertebral Hounsfield Unit Values in the Bridging Group of Ossification-Related Segments in Patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine. The Role of Neuropsychology in the Management of Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Literature Review. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Intersection of Care: Navigating Patient-Hospital Relationships in Neurosurgery".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1