Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Arya Afrooghe, Elham Ahmadi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Rasa Zafari, Amir Reza Bahadori, Mohamed Jalloh, Abbas Tafakhori, Badih Adada, Hamid Borghei-Razavi
{"title":"机器人辅助mri引导激光间质热治疗耐药癫痫的准确性、有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Arya Afrooghe, Elham Ahmadi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Rasa Zafari, Amir Reza Bahadori, Mohamed Jalloh, Abbas Tafakhori, Badih Adada, Hamid Borghei-Razavi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robotic-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive method for ablating seizure foci and has gained prominence in epilepsy treatment. The use of robotic guidance in these procedures can minimize errors in probe placement, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted LITT for drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till July 7<sup>th</sup>, 2024. Two independent authors performed screening and data extraction. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, procedure duration, efficacy, and complications of robot-assisted LITT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The results demonstrated that the overall target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.66 (95%CI = 1.23-2.25) with higher precision in frame-based methods (P = 0.02). The mean procedure duration was 5.35 hours (95%CI = 3.69-7.74) and the pooled ablation time was 11.24 minutes (95%CI = 2.78-45.49); both were longer in disconnection surgery compared to the ablative procedure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In follow-up, 0.58 (95%CI = 0.47-0.69) of patients became seizure-free, and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-0.95) of patients had improvements. Individual patient data analysis showed that robots in LITT are usually used when there are more lesions (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted LITT offers high precision, positive seizure outcomes, and minimal complications, comparable to non-robotic methods, and is suitable for treating drug-resistant epilepsy with multiple lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Robot-Assisted MRI-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Arya Afrooghe, Elham Ahmadi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Rasa Zafari, Amir Reza Bahadori, Mohamed Jalloh, Abbas Tafakhori, Badih Adada, Hamid Borghei-Razavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robotic-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive method for ablating seizure foci and has gained prominence in epilepsy treatment. The use of robotic guidance in these procedures can minimize errors in probe placement, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted LITT for drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till July 7<sup>th</sup>, 2024. Two independent authors performed screening and data extraction. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, procedure duration, efficacy, and complications of robot-assisted LITT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The results demonstrated that the overall target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.66 (95%CI = 1.23-2.25) with higher precision in frame-based methods (P = 0.02). The mean procedure duration was 5.35 hours (95%CI = 3.69-7.74) and the pooled ablation time was 11.24 minutes (95%CI = 2.78-45.49); both were longer in disconnection surgery compared to the ablative procedure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In follow-up, 0.58 (95%CI = 0.47-0.69) of patients became seizure-free, and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-0.95) of patients had improvements. Individual patient data analysis showed that robots in LITT are usually used when there are more lesions (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted LITT offers high precision, positive seizure outcomes, and minimal complications, comparable to non-robotic methods, and is suitable for treating drug-resistant epilepsy with multiple lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Robot-Assisted MRI-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objectives: Robotic-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive method for ablating seizure foci and has gained prominence in epilepsy treatment. The use of robotic guidance in these procedures can minimize errors in probe placement, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted LITT for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till July 7th, 2024. Two independent authors performed screening and data extraction. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, procedure duration, efficacy, and complications of robot-assisted LITT.
Results: Overall, 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The results demonstrated that the overall target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.66 (95%CI = 1.23-2.25) with higher precision in frame-based methods (P = 0.02). The mean procedure duration was 5.35 hours (95%CI = 3.69-7.74) and the pooled ablation time was 11.24 minutes (95%CI = 2.78-45.49); both were longer in disconnection surgery compared to the ablative procedure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In follow-up, 0.58 (95%CI = 0.47-0.69) of patients became seizure-free, and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-0.95) of patients had improvements. Individual patient data analysis showed that robots in LITT are usually used when there are more lesions (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Robot-assisted LITT offers high precision, positive seizure outcomes, and minimal complications, comparable to non-robotic methods, and is suitable for treating drug-resistant epilepsy with multiple lesions.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS