Ana Muñoz, Alberto Espino, Alejandro Soza, Alex Arenas, José Gran, Blanca Norero
{"title":"[在门诊内窥镜检查患者中使用快速诊断检测乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎和人类免疫缺陷病毒的可接受性和筛查结果]。","authors":"Ana Muñoz, Alberto Espino, Alejandro Soza, Alex Arenas, José Gran, Blanca Norero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are a global public health concern. In 2019, there were 295.9 million people with chronic hepatitis B and 57.8 million with HCV, and less than 20% were aware of their status. In 2017, there were 37 million people with HIV, and 75% were diagnosed. Creating accessible screening strategies remains a challenge. The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a cost-effective and simple option. The endoscopy unit is an ideal setting due to its high patient flow and qualified personnel.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use and acceptance of two RDTs for detecting HIV, HBV, and HCV in patients undergoing endoscopic examination and to determine the percentage of refusal to undergo testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional pilot study was conducted. Adults entering two Endoscopy Centers in Santiago were enrolled for outpatient endoscopic examination and were administered two RDTs: Montebio and HCV/HBsAg/HIV Rapid Test after counseling and informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>358 out of 375 patients (96%) accepted the test. 79% were female. The average age was 50±17 years. One subject tested positive for HCV in both tests (0.27%). There were no positive results for HBV/HIV. 17 patients (4.2%) declined the test. The refusal rate by gender was 8.8% (male) vs. 2.7% (female) (p=0.009). The overall experience was positive, and 98% would recommend the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of RDTs in endoscopy represents an opportunity for systematic detection of infected patients with a high level of acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":"44 4","pages":"354-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Acceptability and screening outcomes for hepatitis B, C and human inmunodeficiency virus using rapid diagnostic tests in patients undergoing outpatient endoscopy].\",\"authors\":\"Ana Muñoz, Alberto Espino, Alejandro Soza, Alex Arenas, José Gran, Blanca Norero\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are a global public health concern. In 2019, there were 295.9 million people with chronic hepatitis B and 57.8 million with HCV, and less than 20% were aware of their status. In 2017, there were 37 million people with HIV, and 75% were diagnosed. Creating accessible screening strategies remains a challenge. The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a cost-effective and simple option. The endoscopy unit is an ideal setting due to its high patient flow and qualified personnel.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use and acceptance of two RDTs for detecting HIV, HBV, and HCV in patients undergoing endoscopic examination and to determine the percentage of refusal to undergo testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional pilot study was conducted. Adults entering two Endoscopy Centers in Santiago were enrolled for outpatient endoscopic examination and were administered two RDTs: Montebio and HCV/HBsAg/HIV Rapid Test after counseling and informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>358 out of 375 patients (96%) accepted the test. 79% were female. The average age was 50±17 years. One subject tested positive for HCV in both tests (0.27%). There were no positive results for HBV/HIV. 17 patients (4.2%) declined the test. The refusal rate by gender was 8.8% (male) vs. 2.7% (female) (p=0.009). The overall experience was positive, and 98% would recommend the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of RDTs in endoscopy represents an opportunity for systematic detection of infected patients with a high level of acceptance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"354-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Acceptability and screening outcomes for hepatitis B, C and human inmunodeficiency virus using rapid diagnostic tests in patients undergoing outpatient endoscopy].
Introduction: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are a global public health concern. In 2019, there were 295.9 million people with chronic hepatitis B and 57.8 million with HCV, and less than 20% were aware of their status. In 2017, there were 37 million people with HIV, and 75% were diagnosed. Creating accessible screening strategies remains a challenge. The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a cost-effective and simple option. The endoscopy unit is an ideal setting due to its high patient flow and qualified personnel.
Objective: To evaluate the use and acceptance of two RDTs for detecting HIV, HBV, and HCV in patients undergoing endoscopic examination and to determine the percentage of refusal to undergo testing.
Materials and methods: An observational cross-sectional pilot study was conducted. Adults entering two Endoscopy Centers in Santiago were enrolled for outpatient endoscopic examination and were administered two RDTs: Montebio and HCV/HBsAg/HIV Rapid Test after counseling and informed consent.
Results: 358 out of 375 patients (96%) accepted the test. 79% were female. The average age was 50±17 years. One subject tested positive for HCV in both tests (0.27%). There were no positive results for HBV/HIV. 17 patients (4.2%) declined the test. The refusal rate by gender was 8.8% (male) vs. 2.7% (female) (p=0.009). The overall experience was positive, and 98% would recommend the process.
Conclusions: The use of RDTs in endoscopy represents an opportunity for systematic detection of infected patients with a high level of acceptance.
期刊介绍:
La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.