印模对护生气管吸痰知识技能的影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104262
Dilek Özden, İlkin Yılmaz, Sevda Sönmez
{"title":"印模对护生气管吸痰知识技能的影响。","authors":"Dilek Özden, İlkin Yılmaz, Sevda Sönmez","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study compares knowledge, skills, anxiety, satisfaction and self-confidence regarding suctioning between students trained using a partial task trainer with moulage and those using a low-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Moulage application in simulation has been used in nursing skills training, such as intravenous therapy, pressure ulcer and burn care, but not for suctioning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled study with pre-test, post-test design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducted in a nursing school in Turkey with 77 nursing intern students from 2020 to 2022. Students completed a two-hour theoretical course and four-hour skills training. The experimental group practiced with a task trainer with transparent lungs and moulage, while the control group used a low-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretest suctioning knowledge scores were similar between experimental and control groups (10.54 ± 3.81 vs. 10.85 ± 2.96; p > 0.05). Posttest knowledge scores showed no significant difference (11.48 ± 3.47 vs. 10.35 ± 3.98; p > 0.05). On the other hand, the experimental group had higher skills scores (36.37 ± 2.69 vs. 29.17 ± 4.78; p < 0.001), greater anxiety before skill training (59.83 ± 8.96 vs. 59.72 ± 7.99; p < 0.05), evaluation (63.51 ± 9.32 vs. 58.77 ± 9.39; p < 0.05), higher satisfaction (4.69 ± 0.46 vs. 4.37 ± 0.74; p < 0.05) and self-confidence in learning (4.60 ± 0.46 vs. 4.23 ± 0.69; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moulage significantly enhanced students' skill performance, satisfaction and self-confidence. Although knowledge scores were similar between groups, the experimental group experienced higher anxiety levels before training and evaluation, likely reflecting greater engagement and careful application of skills. These results suggest that students were engaged in learning and applied the skills more carefully. Moulage, which enhances fidelity, should be incorporated into nursing curricula to improve students' learning experiences and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"83 ","pages":"104262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of moulage on nursing students' endotracheal suctioning knowledge and skills.\",\"authors\":\"Dilek Özden, İlkin Yılmaz, Sevda Sönmez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study compares knowledge, skills, anxiety, satisfaction and self-confidence regarding suctioning between students trained using a partial task trainer with moulage and those using a low-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Moulage application in simulation has been used in nursing skills training, such as intravenous therapy, pressure ulcer and burn care, but not for suctioning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled study with pre-test, post-test design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducted in a nursing school in Turkey with 77 nursing intern students from 2020 to 2022. Students completed a two-hour theoretical course and four-hour skills training. The experimental group practiced with a task trainer with transparent lungs and moulage, while the control group used a low-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretest suctioning knowledge scores were similar between experimental and control groups (10.54 ± 3.81 vs. 10.85 ± 2.96; p > 0.05). Posttest knowledge scores showed no significant difference (11.48 ± 3.47 vs. 10.35 ± 3.98; p > 0.05). On the other hand, the experimental group had higher skills scores (36.37 ± 2.69 vs. 29.17 ± 4.78; p < 0.001), greater anxiety before skill training (59.83 ± 8.96 vs. 59.72 ± 7.99; p < 0.05), evaluation (63.51 ± 9.32 vs. 58.77 ± 9.39; p < 0.05), higher satisfaction (4.69 ± 0.46 vs. 4.37 ± 0.74; p < 0.05) and self-confidence in learning (4.60 ± 0.46 vs. 4.23 ± 0.69; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moulage significantly enhanced students' skill performance, satisfaction and self-confidence. Although knowledge scores were similar between groups, the experimental group experienced higher anxiety levels before training and evaluation, likely reflecting greater engagement and careful application of skills. These results suggest that students were engaged in learning and applied the skills more carefully. Moulage, which enhances fidelity, should be incorporated into nursing curricula to improve students' learning experiences and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"104262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了采用局部任务训练器和低保真模拟器训练的学生在吸吮方面的知识、技能、焦虑、满意度和自信心。背景:模拟模压术应用于静脉治疗、压疮、烧伤护理等护理技能培训,但未应用于吸痰。设计:随机对照研究,采用测试前、测试后设计。方法:选取土耳其某护理学校2020 - 2022年护理实习学生77名进行研究。学生们完成了两个小时的理论课程和四个小时的技能培训。实验组使用带透明肺和模膜的任务训练器进行训练,而对照组使用低保真模拟器进行训练。结果:实验组和对照组的前测吸痰知识得分相近(10.54 ± 3.81 vs. 10.85 ± 2.96;p > 0.05)。后测知识得分差异无统计学意义(11.48 ± 3.47 vs. 10.35 ± 3.98;p > 0.05)。另一方面,实验组的技能得分较高(36.37 ± 2.69 vs. 29.17 ± 4.78;p 结论:模印可显著提高学生的技能表现、满意度和自信心。虽然各组之间的知识得分相似,但实验组在训练和评估前经历了更高的焦虑水平,这可能反映了更大的参与度和对技能的谨慎应用。这些结果表明,学生更认真地学习和应用技能。塑形可以提高保真度,应纳入护理课程,以改善学生的学习体验和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of moulage on nursing students' endotracheal suctioning knowledge and skills.

Aim: The study compares knowledge, skills, anxiety, satisfaction and self-confidence regarding suctioning between students trained using a partial task trainer with moulage and those using a low-fidelity simulator.

Background: Moulage application in simulation has been used in nursing skills training, such as intravenous therapy, pressure ulcer and burn care, but not for suctioning.

Design: A randomized controlled study with pre-test, post-test design.

Methods: The study conducted in a nursing school in Turkey with 77 nursing intern students from 2020 to 2022. Students completed a two-hour theoretical course and four-hour skills training. The experimental group practiced with a task trainer with transparent lungs and moulage, while the control group used a low-fidelity simulator.

Results: Pretest suctioning knowledge scores were similar between experimental and control groups (10.54 ± 3.81 vs. 10.85 ± 2.96; p > 0.05). Posttest knowledge scores showed no significant difference (11.48 ± 3.47 vs. 10.35 ± 3.98; p > 0.05). On the other hand, the experimental group had higher skills scores (36.37 ± 2.69 vs. 29.17 ± 4.78; p < 0.001), greater anxiety before skill training (59.83 ± 8.96 vs. 59.72 ± 7.99; p < 0.05), evaluation (63.51 ± 9.32 vs. 58.77 ± 9.39; p < 0.05), higher satisfaction (4.69 ± 0.46 vs. 4.37 ± 0.74; p < 0.05) and self-confidence in learning (4.60 ± 0.46 vs. 4.23 ± 0.69; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Moulage significantly enhanced students' skill performance, satisfaction and self-confidence. Although knowledge scores were similar between groups, the experimental group experienced higher anxiety levels before training and evaluation, likely reflecting greater engagement and careful application of skills. These results suggest that students were engaged in learning and applied the skills more carefully. Moulage, which enhances fidelity, should be incorporated into nursing curricula to improve students' learning experiences and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Unfinished nursing care occurrence, priority order and reasons as perceived by nursing students: An international study" [Nurse Educ. Pract. 79 (2024) 104100]. A cultural adaptation study of nursing informatics competency scale. Augmented reality in intensive care nursing education: A scoping review. Learning from perinatal grief and loss: Insights from midwifery student focus groups. The effect of using Kahoot in pediatric emergency nursing lessons on students' success and motivation levels: A randomized controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1