干性脊柱结核与湿性脊柱结核的治疗方法不同吗?

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.002
Yash Prakash Ved, Tushar Rathod, Deepika Jain, Maulik Kothari
{"title":"干性脊柱结核与湿性脊柱结核的治疗方法不同吗?","authors":"Yash Prakash Ved, Tushar Rathod, Deepika Jain, Maulik Kothari","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>On radiopathological examination of spinal tuberculosis (TB), 2 predominant forms are known: dry and wet types. Wet TB, as the name suggests, has abscess formation as its predominant presenting feature and is the exudative form; dry TB includes caseation and sequestration with minimal exudate. Dry TB often exhibits poorer recovery patterns than the wet counterparts, which can be possibly ascribed to vasculitis, ischemia, or tubercular myelitis, rather than isolated mechanical compression. These pathologic processes may lead to neurological deficit which is less responsive to treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the recovery and prognosis, and test for the significance of difference between neurological recovery pattern and prognosis of the 2 forms of spinal TB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analytical observational study design in the form of a cohort study was performed.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Single-center patient data over 6 years was analyzed. Of 217 patients with spinal TB, 18 had dry TB (Group 1). Two patients were excluded because they presented very late after the onset of neurological deficit, which could have played a role in the nonrecovering nature of motor weakness. The remaining patients had wet TB, of which 22 patients were selected for propensity score matching to form a comparison group.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Radiological measures included vertebral body height loss, deformity, canal encroachment, cord diameter, altered cord signal intensity and loss of CSF space. Functional measures were ambulatory status of the patient at final follow-up and neurologic status measured by ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) and LEMS (Lower Extremity Motor Score) scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The criteria for dry TB were imaging suggestive of granulation tissue (heterogenous hypo- or hyper-intensity on T2WI sequence), with at least 1 of the 2 factors (1) absence of anterior or posterior epidural abscess formation within the spinal canal (2) a canal encroachment of <30%. The groups were compared with respect to their differences in demographic distribution, symptom complex, mycobacterial drug sensitivity and presence of history of tuberculosis elsewhere in the body. Analysis was done by various tests of significance depending on the type of variable. Bar charts and Pie charts were used for visual representation of the analyzed data. Level of significance was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dry TB showed partial or no return to ambulation (75% vs. 31.5% in wet, p=.01) at 12-months and took more time to reach final ambulatory level (9.16 months vs. 2.9 months in wet), despite having a lower average Cobb angle (16.5 degrees versus 20.95 in wet (p=.132), lower mean canal-encroachment (24.9% vs. 50.09% in wet, p<.01) and preserved posterior-CSF flow as compared to wet TB (p=.02). At final follow-up, 4/16 (25%) of dry and 0% of wet TB were ASIA A, and 9/16 (56.25%) dry and 18/22 (72.7%) of wet TB were ASIA E (p=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dry TB of the spine has poorer functional outcome in terms of time to ambulation and final ambulatory status despite having minimal destruction and abscess formation causing mechanical cord compression.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should dry spinal tuberculosis be managed differently than wet spinal tuberculosis?\",\"authors\":\"Yash Prakash Ved, Tushar Rathod, Deepika Jain, Maulik Kothari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>On radiopathological examination of spinal tuberculosis (TB), 2 predominant forms are known: dry and wet types. Wet TB, as the name suggests, has abscess formation as its predominant presenting feature and is the exudative form; dry TB includes caseation and sequestration with minimal exudate. Dry TB often exhibits poorer recovery patterns than the wet counterparts, which can be possibly ascribed to vasculitis, ischemia, or tubercular myelitis, rather than isolated mechanical compression. These pathologic processes may lead to neurological deficit which is less responsive to treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the recovery and prognosis, and test for the significance of difference between neurological recovery pattern and prognosis of the 2 forms of spinal TB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analytical observational study design in the form of a cohort study was performed.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Single-center patient data over 6 years was analyzed. Of 217 patients with spinal TB, 18 had dry TB (Group 1). Two patients were excluded because they presented very late after the onset of neurological deficit, which could have played a role in the nonrecovering nature of motor weakness. The remaining patients had wet TB, of which 22 patients were selected for propensity score matching to form a comparison group.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Radiological measures included vertebral body height loss, deformity, canal encroachment, cord diameter, altered cord signal intensity and loss of CSF space. Functional measures were ambulatory status of the patient at final follow-up and neurologic status measured by ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) and LEMS (Lower Extremity Motor Score) scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The criteria for dry TB were imaging suggestive of granulation tissue (heterogenous hypo- or hyper-intensity on T2WI sequence), with at least 1 of the 2 factors (1) absence of anterior or posterior epidural abscess formation within the spinal canal (2) a canal encroachment of <30%. The groups were compared with respect to their differences in demographic distribution, symptom complex, mycobacterial drug sensitivity and presence of history of tuberculosis elsewhere in the body. Analysis was done by various tests of significance depending on the type of variable. Bar charts and Pie charts were used for visual representation of the analyzed data. Level of significance was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dry TB showed partial or no return to ambulation (75% vs. 31.5% in wet, p=.01) at 12-months and took more time to reach final ambulatory level (9.16 months vs. 2.9 months in wet), despite having a lower average Cobb angle (16.5 degrees versus 20.95 in wet (p=.132), lower mean canal-encroachment (24.9% vs. 50.09% in wet, p<.01) and preserved posterior-CSF flow as compared to wet TB (p=.02). At final follow-up, 4/16 (25%) of dry and 0% of wet TB were ASIA A, and 9/16 (56.25%) dry and 18/22 (72.7%) of wet TB were ASIA E (p=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dry TB of the spine has poorer functional outcome in terms of time to ambulation and final ambulatory status despite having minimal destruction and abscess formation causing mechanical cord compression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在脊柱结核(TB)的放射病理学检查中,已知两种主要形式:干型和湿型。湿性结核,顾名思义,以脓肿形成为主要表现特征,为渗出形式;干结核包括干酪化和隔离,渗出物极少。干性结核通常比湿性结核表现出较差的恢复模式,这可能归因于血管炎、缺血或结核性脊髓炎,而不是孤立的机械压迫。这些病理过程可能导致对治疗反应较差的神经功能缺损。目的:量化两种类型脊柱结核患者的恢复和预后,检验两种类型脊柱结核患者神经系统恢复方式和预后差异的意义。设计:采用队列研究的形式进行回顾性分析观察性研究设计。患者样本:分析6年以上的单中心患者数据。在217例脊柱结核患者中,18例为干性结核(第一组)。2例患者被排除在外,因为他们在发病后很晚才出现神经功能障碍,这可能在运动无力的不可恢复性中起作用。其余为湿性结核患者,选取22例患者进行倾向评分匹配,组成对照组。结果测量:放射学测量包括椎体高度下降、畸形、椎管侵占、脊髓直径、脊髓信号强度改变和脑脊液空间丧失。功能测量是患者在最后随访时的活动状态,以及通过亚洲(美国脊髓损伤协会)和下肢运动评分(LEMS)评分测量的神经系统状态。方法:干性结核的标准是影像学提示肉芽组织(T2WI序列上异质性低或高强度),至少有两个因素中的一个:(1)椎管内没有前或后硬膜外脓肿形成(2)椎管侵犯。干性结核患者在12个月时部分或完全无法恢复行走(75%,湿性结核病患者为31.5%,p=0.01),并且需要更多的时间才能达到最终的行走水平(9.16个月,湿性结核病患者为2.9个月),尽管其平均Cobb角较低(16.5度,湿性结核病患者为20.95度(p=0.132)),平均管道侵入较低(24.9%,湿性结核病患者为50.09%,p)。脊柱干结核在活动时间和最终活动状态方面具有较差的功能结果,尽管具有最小的破坏和脓肿形成,导致机械脊髓压迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should dry spinal tuberculosis be managed differently than wet spinal tuberculosis?

Background context: On radiopathological examination of spinal tuberculosis (TB), 2 predominant forms are known: dry and wet types. Wet TB, as the name suggests, has abscess formation as its predominant presenting feature and is the exudative form; dry TB includes caseation and sequestration with minimal exudate. Dry TB often exhibits poorer recovery patterns than the wet counterparts, which can be possibly ascribed to vasculitis, ischemia, or tubercular myelitis, rather than isolated mechanical compression. These pathologic processes may lead to neurological deficit which is less responsive to treatment.

Purpose: To quantify the recovery and prognosis, and test for the significance of difference between neurological recovery pattern and prognosis of the 2 forms of spinal TB.

Design: A retrospective analytical observational study design in the form of a cohort study was performed.

Patient sample: Single-center patient data over 6 years was analyzed. Of 217 patients with spinal TB, 18 had dry TB (Group 1). Two patients were excluded because they presented very late after the onset of neurological deficit, which could have played a role in the nonrecovering nature of motor weakness. The remaining patients had wet TB, of which 22 patients were selected for propensity score matching to form a comparison group.

Outcome measures: Radiological measures included vertebral body height loss, deformity, canal encroachment, cord diameter, altered cord signal intensity and loss of CSF space. Functional measures were ambulatory status of the patient at final follow-up and neurologic status measured by ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) and LEMS (Lower Extremity Motor Score) scoring.

Methods: The criteria for dry TB were imaging suggestive of granulation tissue (heterogenous hypo- or hyper-intensity on T2WI sequence), with at least 1 of the 2 factors (1) absence of anterior or posterior epidural abscess formation within the spinal canal (2) a canal encroachment of <30%. The groups were compared with respect to their differences in demographic distribution, symptom complex, mycobacterial drug sensitivity and presence of history of tuberculosis elsewhere in the body. Analysis was done by various tests of significance depending on the type of variable. Bar charts and Pie charts were used for visual representation of the analyzed data. Level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results: Dry TB showed partial or no return to ambulation (75% vs. 31.5% in wet, p=.01) at 12-months and took more time to reach final ambulatory level (9.16 months vs. 2.9 months in wet), despite having a lower average Cobb angle (16.5 degrees versus 20.95 in wet (p=.132), lower mean canal-encroachment (24.9% vs. 50.09% in wet, p<.01) and preserved posterior-CSF flow as compared to wet TB (p=.02). At final follow-up, 4/16 (25%) of dry and 0% of wet TB were ASIA A, and 9/16 (56.25%) dry and 18/22 (72.7%) of wet TB were ASIA E (p=.04).

Conclusion: Dry TB of the spine has poorer functional outcome in terms of time to ambulation and final ambulatory status despite having minimal destruction and abscess formation causing mechanical cord compression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes following Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients Living with Dementia. Letter to the editor concerning "What are the risk factors for a second osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture?" by Sang Hoon Hwang, et al. (Spine J. 2023; 23(11):1586-1592. Preoperative determinants of postoperative expectation fulfillment following elective lumbar spine surgery: an observational study from the Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN). Meetings Calendar Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1