{"title":"语音质量作为双相情感障碍的数字生物标志物:系统综述。","authors":"Giovanni Briganti, Jérôme R Lechien","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voice analysis has emerged as a potential biomarker for mood state detection and monitoring in bipolar disorder (BD). The systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence for voice analysis applications in BD, examining (1) the predictive validity of voice quality outcomes for mood state detection, and (2) the correlation between voice parameters and clinical symptom scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library search was carried out by two investigators for publications investigating voice quality in BD according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Studies were assessed using the modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 400 identified publications, 16 studies met the inclusion accounting for 575 BD patients. Machine learning approaches were implemented in 87.5% of studies, with classification accuracies ranging from 70.9% to 96.9%. Manic state detection showed the strongest predictive validity [area under the curve (AUC) up to 0.89], while depression detection demonstrated moderate performance (AUC: 0.66-0.78). Individual-specific models outperformed population-level approaches (correlation coefficients: 0.78 versus 0.44). Voice quality showed significant correlations with standardized clinical scales, particularly Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (normalized root mean square errors: 1.985 and 3.945, respectively). Prosodic features were examined in 81.25% of studies, with pitch consistently elevated during manic episodes. MINORS varied from 10 to 14, with notable limitations in sample size calculations and blinding procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voice quality is a promising biomarker in BD, particularly for manic state detection and individualized monitoring. While controlled settings showed strong performance, naturalistic applications yielded more modest results. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols across different environments and conducting large-scale longitudinal studies with robust methodological controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voice Quality as Digital Biomarker in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Briganti, Jérôme R Lechien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voice analysis has emerged as a potential biomarker for mood state detection and monitoring in bipolar disorder (BD). The systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence for voice analysis applications in BD, examining (1) the predictive validity of voice quality outcomes for mood state detection, and (2) the correlation between voice parameters and clinical symptom scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library search was carried out by two investigators for publications investigating voice quality in BD according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Studies were assessed using the modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 400 identified publications, 16 studies met the inclusion accounting for 575 BD patients. Machine learning approaches were implemented in 87.5% of studies, with classification accuracies ranging from 70.9% to 96.9%. Manic state detection showed the strongest predictive validity [area under the curve (AUC) up to 0.89], while depression detection demonstrated moderate performance (AUC: 0.66-0.78). Individual-specific models outperformed population-level approaches (correlation coefficients: 0.78 versus 0.44). Voice quality showed significant correlations with standardized clinical scales, particularly Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (normalized root mean square errors: 1.985 and 3.945, respectively). Prosodic features were examined in 81.25% of studies, with pitch consistently elevated during manic episodes. MINORS varied from 10 to 14, with notable limitations in sample size calculations and blinding procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voice quality is a promising biomarker in BD, particularly for manic state detection and individualized monitoring. While controlled settings showed strong performance, naturalistic applications yielded more modest results. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols across different environments and conducting large-scale longitudinal studies with robust methodological controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:声音分析已成为双相情感障碍(BD)情绪状态检测和监测的潜在生物标志物。本系统综述旨在总结语音分析在双相障碍中的应用证据,检验(1)语音质量结果对情绪状态检测的预测有效性,以及(2)语音参数与临床症状量表之间的相关性。方法:两位研究者根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项,在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆中检索研究BD语音质量的出版物。采用非随机研究的改良方法学指数(minor)对研究进行评估。结果:在400篇确定的出版物中,16篇研究符合纳入标准,共纳入575例BD患者。87.5%的研究采用了机器学习方法,分类准确率从70.9%到96.9%不等。躁狂状态检测的预测效度最高[曲线下面积(AUC)达0.89],抑郁状态检测的预测效度中等(AUC: 0.66-0.78)。个体特异性模型优于群体水平方法(相关系数:0.78 vs 0.44)。语音质量与标准化临床量表,特别是青年躁狂症评定量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表存在显著相关性(标准化均方根误差分别为1.985和3.945)。81.25%的研究检查了韵律特征,在躁狂发作期间音调持续升高。未成年人从10到14不等,在样本量计算和盲法程序方面有明显的局限性。结论:语音质量是一种很有前景的双相障碍生物标志物,特别是在躁狂状态检测和个体化监测方面。虽然受控设置显示出强大的性能,但自然应用程序产生的结果更为温和。未来的研究应侧重于标准化不同环境下的协议,并在强有力的方法控制下进行大规模的纵向研究。
Voice Quality as Digital Biomarker in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Background: Voice analysis has emerged as a potential biomarker for mood state detection and monitoring in bipolar disorder (BD). The systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence for voice analysis applications in BD, examining (1) the predictive validity of voice quality outcomes for mood state detection, and (2) the correlation between voice parameters and clinical symptom scales.
Methods: A PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library search was carried out by two investigators for publications investigating voice quality in BD according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Studies were assessed using the modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).
Results: Of the 400 identified publications, 16 studies met the inclusion accounting for 575 BD patients. Machine learning approaches were implemented in 87.5% of studies, with classification accuracies ranging from 70.9% to 96.9%. Manic state detection showed the strongest predictive validity [area under the curve (AUC) up to 0.89], while depression detection demonstrated moderate performance (AUC: 0.66-0.78). Individual-specific models outperformed population-level approaches (correlation coefficients: 0.78 versus 0.44). Voice quality showed significant correlations with standardized clinical scales, particularly Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (normalized root mean square errors: 1.985 and 3.945, respectively). Prosodic features were examined in 81.25% of studies, with pitch consistently elevated during manic episodes. MINORS varied from 10 to 14, with notable limitations in sample size calculations and blinding procedures.
Conclusions: Voice quality is a promising biomarker in BD, particularly for manic state detection and individualized monitoring. While controlled settings showed strong performance, naturalistic applications yielded more modest results. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols across different environments and conducting large-scale longitudinal studies with robust methodological controls.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.