COVID-19提供者救济资金按医院特点分配。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1177/10775587241308934
Michael D Rosko, Kate J Li, Mona Al-Amin
{"title":"COVID-19提供者救济资金按医院特点分配。","authors":"Michael D Rosko, Kate J Li, Mona Al-Amin","doi":"10.1177/10775587241308934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the distribution of Covid Provider Relief Funds (PRFs) to 3,886 private and public general acute care hospitals during 2020-2022. Marginal effects from two-part regression were analyzed. More than 13% of study hospitals did not receive PRFs. Some targeted groups of hospitals, that is, safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals (those with high COVID-19 admissions), were the most likely to receive PRFs. Hospitals providing the most uncompensated care, and facilities serving counties with high concentrations of Black or Hispanic populations, were less likely to receive PRFs. Among facilities receiving subsidies, rural, high-impact, safety-net, and financially vulnerable hospitals received more PRFs in relation to their total revenues. Those serving impoverished communities received a larger proportion of PRFs relative to their total revenues, while those in areas with a high concentration of Hispanics received a smaller proportionate subsidy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"10775587241308934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Provider Relief Funds Distribution by Hospital Characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Michael D Rosko, Kate J Li, Mona Al-Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587241308934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed the distribution of Covid Provider Relief Funds (PRFs) to 3,886 private and public general acute care hospitals during 2020-2022. Marginal effects from two-part regression were analyzed. More than 13% of study hospitals did not receive PRFs. Some targeted groups of hospitals, that is, safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals (those with high COVID-19 admissions), were the most likely to receive PRFs. Hospitals providing the most uncompensated care, and facilities serving counties with high concentrations of Black or Hispanic populations, were less likely to receive PRFs. Among facilities receiving subsidies, rural, high-impact, safety-net, and financially vulnerable hospitals received more PRFs in relation to their total revenues. Those serving impoverished communities received a larger proportion of PRFs relative to their total revenues, while those in areas with a high concentration of Hispanics received a smaller proportionate subsidy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10775587241308934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241308934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587241308934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了2020-2022年期间向3,886家私营和公立普通急性护理医院分配的Covid提供者救济基金(prf)。分析了两部分回归的边际效应。超过13%的研究医院没有接受PRFs。一些目标医院群体,即安全网医院和高影响医院(COVID-19住院率高的医院),最有可能获得PRFs。提供最无偿护理的医院,以及为黑人或西班牙裔人口高度集中的县提供服务的设施,接受PRFs的可能性较小。在接受补贴的设施中,农村、影响大、安全网和财政脆弱的医院获得的PRFs相对于其总收入而言更多。那些服务于贫困社区的机构获得的PRFs占其总收入的比例较大,而那些拉美裔人口高度集中地区的机构获得的补贴比例较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 Provider Relief Funds Distribution by Hospital Characteristics.

This study assessed the distribution of Covid Provider Relief Funds (PRFs) to 3,886 private and public general acute care hospitals during 2020-2022. Marginal effects from two-part regression were analyzed. More than 13% of study hospitals did not receive PRFs. Some targeted groups of hospitals, that is, safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals (those with high COVID-19 admissions), were the most likely to receive PRFs. Hospitals providing the most uncompensated care, and facilities serving counties with high concentrations of Black or Hispanic populations, were less likely to receive PRFs. Among facilities receiving subsidies, rural, high-impact, safety-net, and financially vulnerable hospitals received more PRFs in relation to their total revenues. Those serving impoverished communities received a larger proportion of PRFs relative to their total revenues, while those in areas with a high concentration of Hispanics received a smaller proportionate subsidy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fentanyl Test Strips as Harm Reduction for Drug-Related Mortality. Patient Decisional Preferences: A Systematic Review of Instruments Used to Determine Patients' Preferred Role in Decision-Making. Cost, Quality, and Utilization After Hospital-Physician and Hospital-Post Acute Care Vertical Integration: A Systematic Review. A Framework for the Design of Risk-Adjustment Models in Health care Provider Payment Systems. Trends in Medicaid Take-Up Among Eligible Adults After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions: 2014-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1