导航器官和组织捐赠的转诊界限:一项解释性描述研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101158
Kim Lecuyer RN, BNurs(Hons) , Cindy Weatherburn RN, DHlth , Melanie Greenwood PhD
{"title":"导航器官和组织捐赠的转诊界限:一项解释性描述研究。","authors":"Kim Lecuyer RN, BNurs(Hons) ,&nbsp;Cindy Weatherburn RN, DHlth ,&nbsp;Melanie Greenwood PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The gap between organ availability and the number of people waiting for a transplant remains a major healthcare issue. Most transplanted organs and tissue are received from donors who have died in intensive care units (ICUs). To increase the number of donors, national guidelines and professional bodies in Australia support routine consideration of organ and tissue donation at the end of life. Referral to donation specialists is the first important step to explore a patient's donation wishes and consider the potential for donation, but practice is variable, and not all patients receiving end-of-life care in the ICU are referred.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate health professionals’ experiences of making a referral for organ and tissue donation in the intensive care setting and to identify barriers and facilitators that influence practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research approach with semistructured interviews and interpretive description analysis methods was used in this study. Doctors and nurses from a single tertiary referral hospital in Australia who had worked in the intensive care setting were invited to participate. Content from interviews was analysed through a process of coding and inductive thematic analysis. Nine health professionals were interviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A local protocol was in place to support multidisciplinary referral for organ and tissue donation; however, there were organisational barriers and referral misconceptions that discouraged clinicians to make a referral. Nurses felt disempowered to refer and had limited knowledge of what was required. Doctors supported nurses making referrals, acknowledging that the responsibility should be shared to minimise the chance that a referral will be missed. Donation specialist nurses provided valuable support for health professionals navigating the organ and tissue donation process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Research outcomes suggest the need for greater interprofessional collaboration to support a more inclusive referral culture in the ICU to optimise opportunities for organ and tissue donation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the referral boundaries for organ and tissue donation: An interpretive description study\",\"authors\":\"Kim Lecuyer RN, BNurs(Hons) ,&nbsp;Cindy Weatherburn RN, DHlth ,&nbsp;Melanie Greenwood PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The gap between organ availability and the number of people waiting for a transplant remains a major healthcare issue. Most transplanted organs and tissue are received from donors who have died in intensive care units (ICUs). To increase the number of donors, national guidelines and professional bodies in Australia support routine consideration of organ and tissue donation at the end of life. Referral to donation specialists is the first important step to explore a patient's donation wishes and consider the potential for donation, but practice is variable, and not all patients receiving end-of-life care in the ICU are referred.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate health professionals’ experiences of making a referral for organ and tissue donation in the intensive care setting and to identify barriers and facilitators that influence practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative research approach with semistructured interviews and interpretive description analysis methods was used in this study. Doctors and nurses from a single tertiary referral hospital in Australia who had worked in the intensive care setting were invited to participate. Content from interviews was analysed through a process of coding and inductive thematic analysis. Nine health professionals were interviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A local protocol was in place to support multidisciplinary referral for organ and tissue donation; however, there were organisational barriers and referral misconceptions that discouraged clinicians to make a referral. Nurses felt disempowered to refer and had limited knowledge of what was required. Doctors supported nurses making referrals, acknowledging that the responsibility should be shared to minimise the chance that a referral will be missed. Donation specialist nurses provided valuable support for health professionals navigating the organ and tissue donation process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Research outcomes suggest the need for greater interprofessional collaboration to support a more inclusive referral culture in the ICU to optimise opportunities for organ and tissue donation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424003096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424003096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:器官可用性和等待移植的人数之间的差距仍然是一个主要的医疗保健问题。大多数移植器官和组织来自于在重症监护病房(icu)死亡的捐赠者。为了增加捐赠者的数量,澳大利亚的国家指南和专业机构支持在生命结束时例行考虑器官和组织捐赠。转介给捐赠专家是探索患者捐赠意愿和考虑捐赠潜力的第一步,但实践是可变的,并不是所有在ICU接受临终关怀的患者都被转介。目的:本研究的目的是调查卫生专业人员在重症监护环境中进行器官和组织捐赠转诊的经验,并确定影响实践的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用半结构化访谈和解释描述分析相结合的定性研究方法。邀请澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院在重症监护室工作的医生和护士参加。通过编码和归纳主题分析的方法对访谈内容进行分析。采访了9名保健专业人员。研究发现:当地制定了支持器官和组织捐赠的多学科转诊的方案;然而,有组织的障碍和转诊误解,劝阻临床医生作出转诊。护士感到没有权力转诊,对需要什么了解有限。医生支持护士转诊,承认应该分担责任,以尽量减少错过转诊的机会。捐赠专科护士为卫生专业人员在器官和组织捐赠过程中提供了宝贵的支持。结论:研究结果表明,需要加强跨专业合作,以支持ICU中更具包容性的转诊文化,以优化器官和组织捐赠的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating the referral boundaries for organ and tissue donation: An interpretive description study

Background

The gap between organ availability and the number of people waiting for a transplant remains a major healthcare issue. Most transplanted organs and tissue are received from donors who have died in intensive care units (ICUs). To increase the number of donors, national guidelines and professional bodies in Australia support routine consideration of organ and tissue donation at the end of life. Referral to donation specialists is the first important step to explore a patient's donation wishes and consider the potential for donation, but practice is variable, and not all patients receiving end-of-life care in the ICU are referred.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate health professionals’ experiences of making a referral for organ and tissue donation in the intensive care setting and to identify barriers and facilitators that influence practice.

Methods

A qualitative research approach with semistructured interviews and interpretive description analysis methods was used in this study. Doctors and nurses from a single tertiary referral hospital in Australia who had worked in the intensive care setting were invited to participate. Content from interviews was analysed through a process of coding and inductive thematic analysis. Nine health professionals were interviewed.

Findings

A local protocol was in place to support multidisciplinary referral for organ and tissue donation; however, there were organisational barriers and referral misconceptions that discouraged clinicians to make a referral. Nurses felt disempowered to refer and had limited knowledge of what was required. Doctors supported nurses making referrals, acknowledging that the responsibility should be shared to minimise the chance that a referral will be missed. Donation specialist nurses provided valuable support for health professionals navigating the organ and tissue donation process.

Conclusions

Research outcomes suggest the need for greater interprofessional collaboration to support a more inclusive referral culture in the ICU to optimise opportunities for organ and tissue donation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1