足中部骨折:损伤模式和稳定性预测因素。

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-22 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102874
Serena Patel, Danielle Piper, Paul Fenton
{"title":"足中部骨折:损伤模式和稳定性预测因素。","authors":"Serena Patel, Danielle Piper, Paul Fenton","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lisfranc injuries describe a spectrum of midfoot and tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) trauma ranging from purely ligamentous to multiple fracture-dislocations. Lisfranc injuries represent 0.2 % of all fractures and are seen predictably, with mechanisms involving a fall from height, crushing, or torsion. Diagnosis can be challenging, with approximately 20 % of cases being missed, and relies upon clinical acumen and proficient image interpretation. Whilst multiple classification systems have described Lisfranc injuries using a 3-column concept, these add zero prognostic value and are therefore rarely used clinically. Furthermore, existing literature on diagnosis and management is limited to retrospective small series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a review of 161 midfoot injuries, with the aim of highlighting characteristics of radiological instability and indication for operative management. CT scans and weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing X-rays were reviewed for features of joint instability. These features included metatarsal base, cuneiform and cuboid fractures, tarsometatarsal joint subluxation or dislocation and C1-MT2 diastasis. The subsequent \"stable\" and \"unstable\" injury groups were then compared to identify statistically significant indicators for instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Avulsion and intra-articular fractures of the medial, middle, or lateral column were all suggestive of instability. Although these appeared in multiple combinations, 95 % involved the middle column. Concomitant inter-cuneiform and cuboid fractures were additional indicators of instability. In cases of uncertain midfoot instability, weight-bearing radiographs were of value with 14.2 % demonstrating a diastasis of C1-MT2 >2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose the need for a new classification of midfoot injuries which emphasises the diagnosis of instability and guides surgical management. We propose that, based on non-weight-bearing X-ray and CT scans, these injuries can be initially classified as \"stable\", \"unstable\", or \"stability uncertain\". Weight-bearing X-rays are a safe and reliable method of detecting instability in the \"stability uncertain\" group. Fractures of the medial column and cuneiform on initial imaging were suggestive of midfoot instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"61 ","pages":"102874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midfoot fractures: Patterns of injury and predictors of stability.\",\"authors\":\"Serena Patel, Danielle Piper, Paul Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lisfranc injuries describe a spectrum of midfoot and tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) trauma ranging from purely ligamentous to multiple fracture-dislocations. Lisfranc injuries represent 0.2 % of all fractures and are seen predictably, with mechanisms involving a fall from height, crushing, or torsion. Diagnosis can be challenging, with approximately 20 % of cases being missed, and relies upon clinical acumen and proficient image interpretation. Whilst multiple classification systems have described Lisfranc injuries using a 3-column concept, these add zero prognostic value and are therefore rarely used clinically. Furthermore, existing literature on diagnosis and management is limited to retrospective small series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a review of 161 midfoot injuries, with the aim of highlighting characteristics of radiological instability and indication for operative management. CT scans and weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing X-rays were reviewed for features of joint instability. These features included metatarsal base, cuneiform and cuboid fractures, tarsometatarsal joint subluxation or dislocation and C1-MT2 diastasis. The subsequent \\\"stable\\\" and \\\"unstable\\\" injury groups were then compared to identify statistically significant indicators for instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Avulsion and intra-articular fractures of the medial, middle, or lateral column were all suggestive of instability. Although these appeared in multiple combinations, 95 % involved the middle column. Concomitant inter-cuneiform and cuboid fractures were additional indicators of instability. In cases of uncertain midfoot instability, weight-bearing radiographs were of value with 14.2 % demonstrating a diastasis of C1-MT2 >2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose the need for a new classification of midfoot injuries which emphasises the diagnosis of instability and guides surgical management. We propose that, based on non-weight-bearing X-ray and CT scans, these injuries can be initially classified as \\\"stable\\\", \\\"unstable\\\", or \\\"stability uncertain\\\". Weight-bearing X-rays are a safe and reliable method of detecting instability in the \\\"stability uncertain\\\" group. Fractures of the medial column and cuneiform on initial imaging were suggestive of midfoot instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"102874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Lisfranc损伤描述了一系列的足中部和跗跖关节(TMTJ)创伤,从纯粹的韧带到多发性骨折脱位。Lisfranc损伤占所有骨折的0.2%,可以预见,其机制包括从高处坠落、挤压或扭转。诊断可能具有挑战性,约有20%的病例被遗漏,并且依赖于临床敏锐度和熟练的图像解释。虽然有多种分类系统使用3列概念来描述Lisfranc损伤,但这些分类系统没有任何预后价值,因此很少在临床上使用。此外,现有的诊断和治疗文献仅限于回顾性小系列。方法:我们回顾了161例足中部损伤,目的是突出放射学不稳定的特点和手术治疗的指征。回顾了CT扫描和负重和非负重x线片对关节不稳定的特征。这些特征包括跖骨基部、楔形和长方体骨折、跗跖关节半脱位或脱位和C1-MT2分离。随后的“稳定”和“不稳定”损伤组进行比较,以确定不稳定的统计显著指标。结果:内侧、中间或外侧柱的撕脱和关节内骨折均提示不稳定。虽然这些症状出现在多种组合中,但95%的症状与中间一列有关。伴发的楔形骨和长方体间骨折是不稳定的附加指标。在不确定足中部不稳定的病例中,负重x线片有价值,14.2%显示C1-MT2 bb0 2 mm的转移。结论:我们提出需要一种新的足中部损伤分类,强调不稳定的诊断并指导手术治疗。我们建议,基于非负重x线和CT扫描,这些损伤最初可分为“稳定”、“不稳定”或“不确定稳定”。在“稳定性不确定”组中,负重x射线是一种安全可靠的检测不稳定性的方法。内侧柱和楔状骨骨折在初始影像学上提示足中部不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midfoot fractures: Patterns of injury and predictors of stability.

Background: Lisfranc injuries describe a spectrum of midfoot and tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) trauma ranging from purely ligamentous to multiple fracture-dislocations. Lisfranc injuries represent 0.2 % of all fractures and are seen predictably, with mechanisms involving a fall from height, crushing, or torsion. Diagnosis can be challenging, with approximately 20 % of cases being missed, and relies upon clinical acumen and proficient image interpretation. Whilst multiple classification systems have described Lisfranc injuries using a 3-column concept, these add zero prognostic value and are therefore rarely used clinically. Furthermore, existing literature on diagnosis and management is limited to retrospective small series.

Methods: We present a review of 161 midfoot injuries, with the aim of highlighting characteristics of radiological instability and indication for operative management. CT scans and weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing X-rays were reviewed for features of joint instability. These features included metatarsal base, cuneiform and cuboid fractures, tarsometatarsal joint subluxation or dislocation and C1-MT2 diastasis. The subsequent "stable" and "unstable" injury groups were then compared to identify statistically significant indicators for instability.

Results: Avulsion and intra-articular fractures of the medial, middle, or lateral column were all suggestive of instability. Although these appeared in multiple combinations, 95 % involved the middle column. Concomitant inter-cuneiform and cuboid fractures were additional indicators of instability. In cases of uncertain midfoot instability, weight-bearing radiographs were of value with 14.2 % demonstrating a diastasis of C1-MT2 >2 mm.

Conclusion: We propose the need for a new classification of midfoot injuries which emphasises the diagnosis of instability and guides surgical management. We propose that, based on non-weight-bearing X-ray and CT scans, these injuries can be initially classified as "stable", "unstable", or "stability uncertain". Weight-bearing X-rays are a safe and reliable method of detecting instability in the "stability uncertain" group. Fractures of the medial column and cuneiform on initial imaging were suggestive of midfoot instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1