由患者主观总体评估诊断的营养不良和胃肠道癌成人全因死亡风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1111/jhn.70012
Awole Seid, Zelalem Debebe, Abebe Ayelign, Melsew Abeje, Bilal Shikur Endris, Mathewos Assefa, Ahmedin Jemal
{"title":"由患者主观总体评估诊断的营养不良和胃肠道癌成人全因死亡风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Awole Seid,&nbsp;Zelalem Debebe,&nbsp;Abebe Ayelign,&nbsp;Melsew Abeje,&nbsp;Bilal Shikur Endris,&nbsp;Mathewos Assefa,&nbsp;Ahmedin Jemal","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Several reviews have highlighted that the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best diagnostic tool for assessing nutritional status in cancer patients. However, previous meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of malnutrition and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are quite limited. This study aims to determine the overall prevalence and association between malnutrition, as defined by the PG-SGA, and mortality in adults with GI cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive systematic review of articles published from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus. The PRISMA guideline was followed to organize the entire content. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R Studio was performed to quantify the pooled proportion and hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity was evaluated using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and Baujat plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42023465685.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, 46 publications with 23,235 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of malnutrition among adults with GI cancer, as determined by the PG-SGA, was 61% (95% CI: 51%–70%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99%). The pooled prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition were 38% (95% CI: 31%–45%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 96%) and 21% (95% CI: 13%–31%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 98%), respectively. By cancer type, malnutrition was more common in patients with oesophageal cancer (78%, 95% CI: 45%–94%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99%) and gastric cancer (75%, 95% CI: 68%–81%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 87%). Additionally, the overall risk (pooled HR) of malnutrition on mortality among GI cancer patients was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.63–2.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 23%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Malnutrition is common in adults with GI cancer and doubles the risk of all-cause mortality. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early assessment, and intervention for malnutrition to minimize mortality rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malnutrition Diagnosed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Awole Seid,&nbsp;Zelalem Debebe,&nbsp;Abebe Ayelign,&nbsp;Melsew Abeje,&nbsp;Bilal Shikur Endris,&nbsp;Mathewos Assefa,&nbsp;Ahmedin Jemal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Several reviews have highlighted that the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best diagnostic tool for assessing nutritional status in cancer patients. However, previous meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of malnutrition and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are quite limited. This study aims to determine the overall prevalence and association between malnutrition, as defined by the PG-SGA, and mortality in adults with GI cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A comprehensive systematic review of articles published from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus. The PRISMA guideline was followed to organize the entire content. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R Studio was performed to quantify the pooled proportion and hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity was evaluated using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and Baujat plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42023465685.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, 46 publications with 23,235 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of malnutrition among adults with GI cancer, as determined by the PG-SGA, was 61% (95% CI: 51%–70%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99%). The pooled prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition were 38% (95% CI: 31%–45%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 96%) and 21% (95% CI: 13%–31%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 98%), respectively. By cancer type, malnutrition was more common in patients with oesophageal cancer (78%, 95% CI: 45%–94%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99%) and gastric cancer (75%, 95% CI: 68%–81%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 87%). Additionally, the overall risk (pooled HR) of malnutrition on mortality among GI cancer patients was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.63–2.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 23%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Malnutrition is common in adults with GI cancer and doubles the risk of all-cause mortality. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early assessment, and intervention for malnutrition to minimize mortality rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几篇综述强调,患者生成的主观整体评估(PG-SGA)是评估癌症患者营养状况的最佳诊断工具。然而,先前的荟萃分析总结了胃肠道(GI)癌症患者营养不良的患病率和总生存率,这是相当有限的。本研究旨在确定PG-SGA定义的营养不良与胃肠道癌成人死亡率之间的总体患病率和相关性。方法:利用谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Web of Sciences和Scopus对2005 - 2023年发表的论文进行综合系统评价。遵循PRISMA指南组织整个内容。采用R Studio进行随机效应荟萃分析模型,量化合并比例和风险比(hr)。采用Egger检验和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。采用I2和Baujat图评价异质性。本研究在PROSPERO注册,协议号为CRD42023465685。结果:在这项研究中,46篇出版物和23235名参与者被纳入最终的荟萃分析。PG-SGA测定的胃肠道癌患者营养不良的总体发生率为61% (95% CI: 51%-70%, I2 = 99%)。中度和重度营养不良的总患病率分别为38% (95% CI: 31%-45%, I2 = 96%)和21% (95% CI: 13%-31%, I2 = 98%)。按癌症类型分,食管癌(78%,95% CI: 45% ~ 94%, I2 = 99%)和胃癌(75%,95% CI: 68% ~ 81%, I2 = 87%)患者营养不良发生率较高。此外,胃肠道肿瘤患者营养不良对死亡率的总体风险(合并HR)为2.02 (95% CI: 1.63%-2.5%, I2 = 23%)。结论:营养不良在成人胃肠道癌患者中很常见,并使全因死亡率增加一倍。这些结果强调了在预防、早期评估和干预营养不良方面进行持续努力以尽量减少死亡率的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Malnutrition Diagnosed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Several reviews have highlighted that the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best diagnostic tool for assessing nutritional status in cancer patients. However, previous meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of malnutrition and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are quite limited. This study aims to determine the overall prevalence and association between malnutrition, as defined by the PG-SGA, and mortality in adults with GI cancer.

Methods

A comprehensive systematic review of articles published from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus. The PRISMA guideline was followed to organize the entire content. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R Studio was performed to quantify the pooled proportion and hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Baujat plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42023465685.

Results

In this study, 46 publications with 23,235 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of malnutrition among adults with GI cancer, as determined by the PG-SGA, was 61% (95% CI: 51%–70%, I2 = 99%). The pooled prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition were 38% (95% CI: 31%–45%, I2 = 96%) and 21% (95% CI: 13%–31%, I2 = 98%), respectively. By cancer type, malnutrition was more common in patients with oesophageal cancer (78%, 95% CI: 45%–94%, I2 = 99%) and gastric cancer (75%, 95% CI: 68%–81%, I2 = 87%). Additionally, the overall risk (pooled HR) of malnutrition on mortality among GI cancer patients was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.63–2.5, I2 = 23%).

Conclusion

Malnutrition is common in adults with GI cancer and doubles the risk of all-cause mortality. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early assessment, and intervention for malnutrition to minimize mortality rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Counselling Interventions in Malnutrition Research: Achieving an International Consensus on Best Practices Using an Amended Delphi Process Effectiveness of an Intervention to Prevent Ultra-Processed Foods and Added Sugar in the First Year of Life: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial in Brazil Evaluation of a Trauma-Informed Nutrition Curriculum for Women With Children Living in Transitional Housing Socio-Demographic Determinants of Mediterranean Diet Adherence: Results of the EU-National Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3) Ultra-Processed Foods and Dietetic Practice: Findings From a Survey and Focus Group With UK Dietitians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1