日本医生和公众对协助死亡态度的差异。

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9
Yoshiyuki Takimoto, Tadanori Nabeshima
{"title":"日本医生和公众对协助死亡态度的差异。","authors":"Yoshiyuki Takimoto, Tadanori Nabeshima","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, an increasing number of countries have been allowing voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as part of palliative care. Japan stands out as the most aged country in the developed world, and while the need for palliative care for older adults with dementia has been noted, there has been reluctance to openly address VAE and PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online questionnaire survey using a vignette case to investigate the attitudes of Japanese physicians and the general public towards VAE and PAS, and the factors influencing these attitudes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that Japanese physicians did not display support for euthanasia (2%) and assisted suicide (1%); however, the general public supported euthanasia (33%) and assisted suicide (34%). Notably, among the general public, males exhibited significantly higher support for PAS than females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Japanese physicians and the general public expressed a more negative stance towards VAE and PAS compared with their counterparts in Western countries. This disparity may be attributed to the influence of the Buddhist view of life and death and family-centeredness in the Japanese culture, which affects people's attitudes towards assisted dying. The gap between physicians and the general public could potentially lead to challenges in medical practice, thereby, necessitating the need for open discussions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dying among physicians and the general public in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiyuki Takimoto, Tadanori Nabeshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, an increasing number of countries have been allowing voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as part of palliative care. Japan stands out as the most aged country in the developed world, and while the need for palliative care for older adults with dementia has been noted, there has been reluctance to openly address VAE and PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online questionnaire survey using a vignette case to investigate the attitudes of Japanese physicians and the general public towards VAE and PAS, and the factors influencing these attitudes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that Japanese physicians did not display support for euthanasia (2%) and assisted suicide (1%); however, the general public supported euthanasia (33%) and assisted suicide (34%). Notably, among the general public, males exhibited significantly higher support for PAS than females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Japanese physicians and the general public expressed a more negative stance towards VAE and PAS compared with their counterparts in Western countries. This disparity may be attributed to the influence of the Buddhist view of life and death and family-centeredness in the Japanese culture, which affects people's attitudes towards assisted dying. The gap between physicians and the general public could potentially lead to challenges in medical practice, thereby, necessitating the need for open discussions in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748524/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近,越来越多的国家允许自愿主动安乐死(VAE)和医生协助自杀(PAS)作为姑息治疗的一部分。日本是发达国家中老龄化最严重的国家,虽然已经注意到老年痴呆症患者需要姑息治疗,但一直不愿公开解决VAE和PAS问题。方法:采用网络问卷调查的方式,结合一个小案例,调查日本医生和公众对VAE和PAS的态度及其影响因素。结果:调查结果显示,日本医生不支持安乐死(2%)和协助自杀(1%);然而,公众支持安乐死(33%)和协助自杀(34%)。值得注意的是,在普通公众中,男性对PAS的支持率明显高于女性。结论:与西方国家相比,日本医生和公众对VAE和PAS的态度更为消极。这种差异可能是由于日本文化中佛教的生死观和以家庭为中心的观念的影响,影响了人们对协助死亡的态度。医生和公众之间的差距可能会导致医疗实践中的挑战,因此需要在未来进行公开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dying among physicians and the general public in Japan.

Background: Recently, an increasing number of countries have been allowing voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as part of palliative care. Japan stands out as the most aged country in the developed world, and while the need for palliative care for older adults with dementia has been noted, there has been reluctance to openly address VAE and PAS.

Methods: We conducted an online questionnaire survey using a vignette case to investigate the attitudes of Japanese physicians and the general public towards VAE and PAS, and the factors influencing these attitudes.

Results: The findings revealed that Japanese physicians did not display support for euthanasia (2%) and assisted suicide (1%); however, the general public supported euthanasia (33%) and assisted suicide (34%). Notably, among the general public, males exhibited significantly higher support for PAS than females.

Conclusion: Japanese physicians and the general public expressed a more negative stance towards VAE and PAS compared with their counterparts in Western countries. This disparity may be attributed to the influence of the Buddhist view of life and death and family-centeredness in the Japanese culture, which affects people's attitudes towards assisted dying. The gap between physicians and the general public could potentially lead to challenges in medical practice, thereby, necessitating the need for open discussions in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Aesthetic dentistry and ethics: a systematic review of marketing practices and overtreatment in cosmetic dental procedures. Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers at rural health facilities in Eastern Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study. Ethical issues raised in the care of the elderly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and possible solutions for the future: a systematic review of qualitative scientific literature. Lay views in Southern France of the acceptability of refusing to provide treatment because of alleged futility. Students' attitudes toward euthanasia and abortion: a cross-cultural study in three Mediterranean countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1