评估英国患者对麻醉师和麻醉的了解。

Oliver J.H. Baker, Rama Varadan
{"title":"评估英国患者对麻醉师和麻醉的了解。","authors":"Oliver J.H. Baker,&nbsp;Rama Varadan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous UK studies found that only 50–67% of patients are aware that anaesthetists are qualified doctors, and public knowledge of anaesthetists' roles was poor. This study aimed to assess patients' knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia, to identify if there has been any improvement over the past two decades. A secondary aim was to determine if exposure to anaesthetists during day case surgery improved patient knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This UK-based, single-centre, cross-sectional study included 150 patients attending for day case surgery. Patients were given a questionnaire on their knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia both before and after surgery. Patients were included if they had not yet been pre-assessed by an anaesthetist, if they were over 18 years old and if they were not healthcare professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 150 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. 51.3% were female and the median age was 51.6 years (range 18–90 years). Before surgery, only 39.3% of patients knew that anaesthetists were doctors, despite 82.4% having had previous anaesthetics. After surgery, this reduced to 38%. There was no significant improvement in patients' knowledge of anaesthetists’ roles both inside and outside of operating theatres in postoperative questionnaires (p&gt;0.05). Patients most frequently recognised that anaesthetists work in operating theatres (80%), intensive care units (54%), medical emergency teams (52.7%), and on labour wards (50%). Furthermore, 76.6% of patients recalled seeing an anaesthetist before previous operations and 81.3% were aware that general anaesthesia involved volatile gases or intravenous drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study found that many patients are not aware that anaesthetists are medically qualified. Exposure to anaesthetists on the day of surgery did not improve patients' knowledge of the roles of anaesthetists or their knowledge of anaesthesia itself.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing UK patients' knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Oliver J.H. Baker,&nbsp;Rama Varadan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous UK studies found that only 50–67% of patients are aware that anaesthetists are qualified doctors, and public knowledge of anaesthetists' roles was poor. This study aimed to assess patients' knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia, to identify if there has been any improvement over the past two decades. A secondary aim was to determine if exposure to anaesthetists during day case surgery improved patient knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This UK-based, single-centre, cross-sectional study included 150 patients attending for day case surgery. Patients were given a questionnaire on their knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia both before and after surgery. Patients were included if they had not yet been pre-assessed by an anaesthetist, if they were over 18 years old and if they were not healthcare professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 150 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. 51.3% were female and the median age was 51.6 years (range 18–90 years). Before surgery, only 39.3% of patients knew that anaesthetists were doctors, despite 82.4% having had previous anaesthetics. After surgery, this reduced to 38%. There was no significant improvement in patients' knowledge of anaesthetists’ roles both inside and outside of operating theatres in postoperative questionnaires (p&gt;0.05). Patients most frequently recognised that anaesthetists work in operating theatres (80%), intensive care units (54%), medical emergency teams (52.7%), and on labour wards (50%). Furthermore, 76.6% of patients recalled seeing an anaesthetist before previous operations and 81.3% were aware that general anaesthesia involved volatile gases or intravenous drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study found that many patients are not aware that anaesthetists are medically qualified. Exposure to anaesthetists on the day of surgery did not improve patients' knowledge of the roles of anaesthetists or their knowledge of anaesthesia itself.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国以前的研究发现,只有50-67%的患者知道麻醉师是合格的医生,公众对麻醉师角色的认识很差。本研究旨在评估患者对麻醉师和麻醉的了解,以确定在过去二十年中是否有任何改善。第二个目的是确定在日间手术中暴露于麻醉师是否提高了患者的知识。方法:这项以英国为基础的单中心横断面研究纳入了150例日间手术患者。患者在术前和术后接受了一份关于麻醉师和麻醉知识的调查问卷。如果患者还没有经过麻醉师的预评估,如果他们超过18岁,如果他们不是医疗保健专业人员,他们就被包括在内。结果:150例患者均完成了术前和术后问卷调查。51.3%为女性,年龄中位数为51.6岁(18-90岁)。术前只有39.3%的患者知道麻醉师是医生,而82.4%的患者曾接受过麻醉。手术后,这一比例降至38%。在术后问卷中,患者对麻醉医师在手术室内外的作用的了解情况无明显改善(p < 0.05)。患者最常认识到麻醉师在手术室(80%)、重症监护病房(54%)、医疗急救小组(52.7%)和产房(50%)工作。此外,76.6%的患者回忆以前手术前见过麻醉师,81.3%的患者知道全身麻醉涉及挥发性气体或静脉注射药物。结论:本研究发现许多患者不知道麻醉师是有医学资格的。在手术当天接触麻醉师并没有提高患者对麻醉师的作用或麻醉本身的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing UK patients' knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia

Background

Previous UK studies found that only 50–67% of patients are aware that anaesthetists are qualified doctors, and public knowledge of anaesthetists' roles was poor. This study aimed to assess patients' knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia, to identify if there has been any improvement over the past two decades. A secondary aim was to determine if exposure to anaesthetists during day case surgery improved patient knowledge.

Methods

This UK-based, single-centre, cross-sectional study included 150 patients attending for day case surgery. Patients were given a questionnaire on their knowledge of anaesthetists and anaesthesia both before and after surgery. Patients were included if they had not yet been pre-assessed by an anaesthetist, if they were over 18 years old and if they were not healthcare professionals.

Results

All 150 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. 51.3% were female and the median age was 51.6 years (range 18–90 years). Before surgery, only 39.3% of patients knew that anaesthetists were doctors, despite 82.4% having had previous anaesthetics. After surgery, this reduced to 38%. There was no significant improvement in patients' knowledge of anaesthetists’ roles both inside and outside of operating theatres in postoperative questionnaires (p>0.05). Patients most frequently recognised that anaesthetists work in operating theatres (80%), intensive care units (54%), medical emergency teams (52.7%), and on labour wards (50%). Furthermore, 76.6% of patients recalled seeing an anaesthetist before previous operations and 81.3% were aware that general anaesthesia involved volatile gases or intravenous drugs.

Conclusions

This study found that many patients are not aware that anaesthetists are medically qualified. Exposure to anaesthetists on the day of surgery did not improve patients' knowledge of the roles of anaesthetists or their knowledge of anaesthesia itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implanted port catheters in patients with breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PICCPORT randomised controlled trial Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial) The concerted actions of microRNA-29a and interferon-β modulate complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain by regulating the expression of type 1 interferon receptor, interferon-stimulated gene 15, and p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1