复发性肝细胞癌再切除术的疗效和预后指标:来自回顾性研究的见解。

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.004
Qi Fan MM , Pengcheng Wei MM , Delin Ma MD , Qian Cheng MD , Jie Gao MD , Jiye Zhu MD , Zhao Li MD
{"title":"复发性肝细胞癌再切除术的疗效和预后指标:来自回顾性研究的见解。","authors":"Qi Fan MM ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Wei MM ,&nbsp;Delin Ma MD ,&nbsp;Qian Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Jie Gao MD ,&nbsp;Jiye Zhu MD ,&nbsp;Zhao Li MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC), identify prognostic factors, and provide clinical guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 rHCC patients undergoing re-resection and 60 primary HCC patients undergoing initial hepatectomy at Peking University People's Hospital (2014–2022). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). DFS was similar between groups (30.8 vs. 32.2 months, <em>P</em> = 0.612). The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS rates for the re-resection group were 88.5 %, 64.9 %, and 56.7 %, respectively, versus 88.3 %, 65.0 %, and 53.3 % for the primary resection group. OS was lower in the re-resection group (36.1 vs. 47.2 months, <em>P</em> = 0.041) with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates of 90.8 %, 73.1 %, and 60.0 %, compared to 95.0 %, 80.0 %, and 68.3 % for the primary resection group. Significant factors affecting DFS were Child-Pugh classification (<em>P</em> = 0.044), time to recurrence (<em>P</em> = 0.002), tumor differentiation (P = 0.044), and satellite nodules (<em>P</em> = 0.019). Factors influencing OS included Child-Pugh classification (<em>P</em> = 0.040), time to recurrence (<em>P</em> = 0.002), and tumor differentiation (<em>P</em> = 0.032).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><em>Re</em>-resection is an effective treatment option for rHCC, with favorable outcomes as measured by DFS and OS, though OS is lower compared to initial hepatectomy. Key prognostic factors include Child-Pugh classification, time to recurrence, tumor differentiation, and satellite nodules.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy and prognostic indicators in re-resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Qi Fan MM ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Wei MM ,&nbsp;Delin Ma MD ,&nbsp;Qian Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Jie Gao MD ,&nbsp;Jiye Zhu MD ,&nbsp;Zhao Li MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC), identify prognostic factors, and provide clinical guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 rHCC patients undergoing re-resection and 60 primary HCC patients undergoing initial hepatectomy at Peking University People's Hospital (2014–2022). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). DFS was similar between groups (30.8 vs. 32.2 months, <em>P</em> = 0.612). The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS rates for the re-resection group were 88.5 %, 64.9 %, and 56.7 %, respectively, versus 88.3 %, 65.0 %, and 53.3 % for the primary resection group. OS was lower in the re-resection group (36.1 vs. 47.2 months, <em>P</em> = 0.041) with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates of 90.8 %, 73.1 %, and 60.0 %, compared to 95.0 %, 80.0 %, and 68.3 % for the primary resection group. Significant factors affecting DFS were Child-Pugh classification (<em>P</em> = 0.044), time to recurrence (<em>P</em> = 0.002), tumor differentiation (P = 0.044), and satellite nodules (<em>P</em> = 0.019). Factors influencing OS included Child-Pugh classification (<em>P</em> = 0.040), time to recurrence (<em>P</em> = 0.002), and tumor differentiation (<em>P</em> = 0.032).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><em>Re</em>-resection is an effective treatment option for rHCC, with favorable outcomes as measured by DFS and OS, though OS is lower compared to initial hepatectomy. Key prognostic factors include Child-Pugh classification, time to recurrence, tumor differentiation, and satellite nodules.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733202/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价再切除治疗复发性肝细胞癌(rHCC)的疗效,探讨影响预后的因素,为临床提供指导。方法:回顾性分析2014-2022年北京大学人民医院再次行肝癌切除术的130例rHCC患者和首次行肝切除术的60例原发性HCC患者。比较无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用单因素和多因素COX回归分析确定预后因素。结果:两组间基线特征具有可比性(P < 0.05)。两组间DFS相似(30.8个月vs. 32.2个月,P = 0.612)。再切除组的1年、2年和3年DFS分别为88.5%、64.9%和56.7%,而首次切除组的DFS分别为88.3%、65.0%和53.3%。再切除组的OS较低(36.1个月vs. 47.2个月,P = 0.041), 1年、2年和3年的OS率分别为90.8%、73.1%和60.0%,而首次切除组的OS率分别为95.0%、80.0%和68.3%。影响DFS的显著因素为Child-Pugh分型(P = 0.044)、复发时间(P = 0.002)、肿瘤分化(P = 0.044)、卫星结节(P = 0.019)。影响OS的因素包括Child-Pugh分型(P = 0.040)、复发时间(P = 0.002)和肿瘤分化(P = 0.032)。结论:再切除是rHCC的有效治疗选择,通过DFS和OS来衡量具有良好的结果,尽管OS比初始肝切除术低。关键预后因素包括Child-Pugh分类、复发时间、肿瘤分化和伴发结节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic efficacy and prognostic indicators in re-resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from a retrospective study

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC), identify prognostic factors, and provide clinical guidance.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 rHCC patients undergoing re-resection and 60 primary HCC patients undergoing initial hepatectomy at Peking University People's Hospital (2014–2022). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses.

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). DFS was similar between groups (30.8 vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.612). The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS rates for the re-resection group were 88.5 %, 64.9 %, and 56.7 %, respectively, versus 88.3 %, 65.0 %, and 53.3 % for the primary resection group. OS was lower in the re-resection group (36.1 vs. 47.2 months, P = 0.041) with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates of 90.8 %, 73.1 %, and 60.0 %, compared to 95.0 %, 80.0 %, and 68.3 % for the primary resection group. Significant factors affecting DFS were Child-Pugh classification (P = 0.044), time to recurrence (P = 0.002), tumor differentiation (P = 0.044), and satellite nodules (P = 0.019). Factors influencing OS included Child-Pugh classification (P = 0.040), time to recurrence (P = 0.002), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Re-resection is an effective treatment option for rHCC, with favorable outcomes as measured by DFS and OS, though OS is lower compared to initial hepatectomy. Key prognostic factors include Child-Pugh classification, time to recurrence, tumor differentiation, and satellite nodules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Use of a microvascular anastomotic coupler device for kidney transplantation in rats Perceptions and attitudes of medical students toward opioid education: A qualitative study Innovative strategies in bile duct repair: Assessing efficacy and safety across varied graft techniques - A systematic review Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients Introduction from the New Editor of Diversity, Justice and Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1