前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后PSA低于1 ng/mL诊断为前列腺癌患者的F-PSMA PET/CT阴性研究对补救性放疗预后的临床价值[18F]。

M Cózar Santiago, J García Garzón, A Esteban Hurtado, J Pastor Peiro, J Ferrer Rebolleda
{"title":"前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后PSA低于1 ng/mL诊断为前列腺癌患者的F-PSMA PET/CT阴性研究对补救性放疗预后的临床价值[18F]。","authors":"M Cózar Santiago, J García Garzón, A Esteban Hurtado, J Pastor Peiro, J Ferrer Rebolleda","doi":"10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the clinical value of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA negative PET/CT, in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with elevated PSA less than 1 ng/mL, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We prospectively included 98 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence [mean PSA 0.51 ng/mL (range 0.17-1.0 ng/mL)] who were referred for an [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study. The [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT scan was negative in 53/98 patients (54.09%). Differences were analysed between those patients who were or were not candidates for pelvic salvage radiotherapy (PSRT) decided upon multidisciplinary committee and patient consent, with a minimum follow-up time for 1 year. Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction in PSA levels. Recurrence was ascertained upon clinical, analytical and imaging follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54.7% (29/53) of the patients with a negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT underwent PSRT. Of these, 93.1% (27/29) patients demonstrated response to treatment (PSMA false negatives). The remaining two patients showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. 45.3% (24/53) of patients with negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT did not undergo PSRT. Of these, progressive PSA elevation was observed in 62.5% (15/24) (PSMA false negatives), localising recurrence on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study in 4 patients. The remaining 9 patients (37.5%) showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. Our series confirmed 42 (42.85%) [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT false negatives cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence and a negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study are likely to benefit from pelvic salvage radiotherapy, with response seen in 93.1% of our cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94197,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","volume":" ","pages":"500071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical value of a negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA PET/CT study in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with PSA rising below 1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"M Cózar Santiago, J García Garzón, A Esteban Hurtado, J Pastor Peiro, J Ferrer Rebolleda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the clinical value of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA negative PET/CT, in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with elevated PSA less than 1 ng/mL, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We prospectively included 98 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence [mean PSA 0.51 ng/mL (range 0.17-1.0 ng/mL)] who were referred for an [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study. The [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT scan was negative in 53/98 patients (54.09%). Differences were analysed between those patients who were or were not candidates for pelvic salvage radiotherapy (PSRT) decided upon multidisciplinary committee and patient consent, with a minimum follow-up time for 1 year. Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction in PSA levels. Recurrence was ascertained upon clinical, analytical and imaging follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54.7% (29/53) of the patients with a negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT underwent PSRT. Of these, 93.1% (27/29) patients demonstrated response to treatment (PSMA false negatives). The remaining two patients showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. 45.3% (24/53) of patients with negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT did not undergo PSRT. Of these, progressive PSA elevation was observed in 62.5% (15/24) (PSMA false negatives), localising recurrence on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study in 4 patients. The remaining 9 patients (37.5%) showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. Our series confirmed 42 (42.85%) [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT false negatives cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence and a negative [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study are likely to benefit from pelvic salvage radiotherapy, with response seen in 93.1% of our cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"500071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨[18F]F-PSMA阴性PET/CT对前列腺癌行前列腺切除术且PSA升高小于1 ng/mL患者补救性放疗预后的临床价值。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入98例诊断为前列腺癌并行前列腺切除术并生化复发的患者[平均PSA 0.51 ng/mL(范围0.17-1.0 ng/mL)],并转介进行[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT研究。[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT扫描阴性53/98例(54.09%)。经多学科委员会和患者同意决定是否接受盆腔保留放疗(PSRT)的患者之间进行差异分析,随访时间至少为1年。对治疗的反应被定义为PSA水平降低50%。根据临床、分析和影像学随访结果确定复发。结果:54.7%(29/53)的[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT阴性患者行PSRT。其中,93.1%(27/29)患者表现出对治疗的反应(PSMA假阴性)。其余2例患者在[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT随访研究中显示PSA水平波动,但未发现疾病。45.3%(24/53)的F-PSMA -PET/CT阴性[18F]患者未行PSRT。其中,62.5%(15/24)的患者出现进行性PSA升高(PSMA假阴性),4例患者在[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT随访研究中定位复发。其余9例(37.5%)患者在[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT随访研究中显示PSA水平波动,但未发现疾病。我们确认了42例(42.85%)[18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT假阴性病例。结论:诊断为前列腺癌的前列腺切除术后生化复发且F-PSMA -PET/CT阴性的患者可能受益于盆腔补救性放疗,93.1%的病例有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical value of a negative [18F]F-PSMA PET/CT study in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with PSA rising below 1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy.

Objective: To assess the clinical value of [18F]F-PSMA negative PET/CT, in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with elevated PSA less than 1 ng/mL, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy.

Method: We prospectively included 98 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence [mean PSA 0.51 ng/mL (range 0.17-1.0 ng/mL)] who were referred for an [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study. The [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT scan was negative in 53/98 patients (54.09%). Differences were analysed between those patients who were or were not candidates for pelvic salvage radiotherapy (PSRT) decided upon multidisciplinary committee and patient consent, with a minimum follow-up time for 1 year. Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction in PSA levels. Recurrence was ascertained upon clinical, analytical and imaging follow-up outcomes.

Results: 54.7% (29/53) of the patients with a negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT underwent PSRT. Of these, 93.1% (27/29) patients demonstrated response to treatment (PSMA false negatives). The remaining two patients showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. 45.3% (24/53) of patients with negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT did not undergo PSRT. Of these, progressive PSA elevation was observed in 62.5% (15/24) (PSMA false negatives), localising recurrence on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study in 4 patients. The remaining 9 patients (37.5%) showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. Our series confirmed 42 (42.85%) [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT false negatives cases.

Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence and a negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study are likely to benefit from pelvic salvage radiotherapy, with response seen in 93.1% of our cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of [99mTc]Tc-DPD gated-SPECT-CT in the assessment of myocardial uptake patterns in transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR-CA). A hypoallergenic solid meal for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy based on mediterranean diet. "One diet to empty almost everyone". Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET/CT in a case of primary hepatic Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma Of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue. Novel heterogeneity method for predicting survival in non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Predicting Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Role of Baseline Volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters and Inflammatory Markers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1