导航疫苗信心:一项混合方法研究调查了四个非欧盟欧洲地区医疗保健提供者的观点。

Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126694
Toni Claessens, Rachel L Eagan, Greet Hendrickx, Pierre Van Damme, Heidi J Larson, Emilie Karafillakis
{"title":"导航疫苗信心:一项混合方法研究调查了四个非欧盟欧洲地区医疗保健提供者的观点。","authors":"Toni Claessens, Rachel L Eagan, Greet Hendrickx, Pierre Van Damme, Heidi J Larson, Emilie Karafillakis","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine confidence remains a global public health challenge, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public trust in vaccines is crucial, with healthcare providers (HCPs) playing a pivotal role in navigating this sensitive topic. This requires an understanding of HCPs' perceptions of vaccines. Most European studies focus solely on the 27 EU countries, with sparse evidence available among other European countries. This study aims to expand the scope of HCPs' vaccine confidence oversight into European regions where limited research has been conducted thus far.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine vaccine confidence among HCPs (general practitioners and nurses) in six European countries outside of the EU: North Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina (Balkans), Belarus (Eastern Europe), Armenia, Georgia (Caucasus), and Kazakhstan (Central Asia). Quantitative surveys (N = 600) assessed vaccine confidence levels and recommendation practices, which were analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative interviews (N = 30) provided deeper insights into HCPs' perceptions of vaccination, role, and training needs, and were processed using NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed varying levels of vaccine confidence among HCPs across the six countries. The quantitative survey indicated disparities in confidence levels, with Belarus and Kazakhstan exhibiting notably lower confidence in vaccines. North Macedonia stands out as the country where HCPs are most confident about their role in encouraging vaccination, while the remaining five countries share similar lower levels. Qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into HCP perspectives, highlighting the complexities of tailoring recommendations and the collaborative decision-making process. HCPs expressed a clear need for training on vaccination, particularly in understanding effective doctor-patient communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the value of implementing targeted interventions to support HCPs, for example by providing training in vaccination knowledge and communication to improve their confidence in addressing patient concerns about vaccination. Ultimately, responding to skills and knowledge needs, this can contribute to improved vaccine acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"47 ","pages":"126694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating vaccine confidence: A mixed methods study investigating healthcare providers' perspectives across four non-EU European regions.\",\"authors\":\"Toni Claessens, Rachel L Eagan, Greet Hendrickx, Pierre Van Damme, Heidi J Larson, Emilie Karafillakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine confidence remains a global public health challenge, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public trust in vaccines is crucial, with healthcare providers (HCPs) playing a pivotal role in navigating this sensitive topic. This requires an understanding of HCPs' perceptions of vaccines. Most European studies focus solely on the 27 EU countries, with sparse evidence available among other European countries. This study aims to expand the scope of HCPs' vaccine confidence oversight into European regions where limited research has been conducted thus far.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine vaccine confidence among HCPs (general practitioners and nurses) in six European countries outside of the EU: North Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina (Balkans), Belarus (Eastern Europe), Armenia, Georgia (Caucasus), and Kazakhstan (Central Asia). Quantitative surveys (N = 600) assessed vaccine confidence levels and recommendation practices, which were analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative interviews (N = 30) provided deeper insights into HCPs' perceptions of vaccination, role, and training needs, and were processed using NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed varying levels of vaccine confidence among HCPs across the six countries. The quantitative survey indicated disparities in confidence levels, with Belarus and Kazakhstan exhibiting notably lower confidence in vaccines. North Macedonia stands out as the country where HCPs are most confident about their role in encouraging vaccination, while the remaining five countries share similar lower levels. Qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into HCP perspectives, highlighting the complexities of tailoring recommendations and the collaborative decision-making process. HCPs expressed a clear need for training on vaccination, particularly in understanding effective doctor-patient communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the value of implementing targeted interventions to support HCPs, for example by providing training in vaccination knowledge and communication to improve their confidence in addressing patient concerns about vaccination. Ultimately, responding to skills and knowledge needs, this can contribute to improved vaccine acceptance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"126694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疫苗信心仍然是一项全球公共卫生挑战,在COVID-19大流行期间尤其突出。公众对疫苗的信任至关重要,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)在引导这一敏感话题方面发挥着关键作用。这需要了解医务人员对疫苗的看法。大多数欧洲研究只关注27个欧盟国家,其他欧洲国家的证据很少。这项研究旨在将HCPs疫苗信任监督的范围扩大到迄今为止进行有限研究的欧洲地区。方法:该研究采用混合方法调查欧盟以外六个欧洲国家HCPs(全科医生和护士)的疫苗信心:北马其顿、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(巴尔干半岛)、白俄罗斯(东欧)、亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚(高加索)和哈萨克斯坦(中亚)。定量调查(N = 600)评估疫苗置信水平和推荐做法,并使用SPSS进行分析。定性访谈(N = 30)提供了更深入的见解,了解卫生保健人员对疫苗接种、作用和培训需求的看法,并使用NVivo进行了处理。结果:研究结果显示,六个国家的卫生保健专业人员对疫苗的信心水平各不相同。定量调查表明,信心水平存在差异,白俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦对疫苗的信心明显较低。北马其顿是卫生保健专业人员对其在鼓励接种疫苗方面的作用最有信心的国家,而其余五个国家的水平相似,较低。定性访谈提供了对HCP视角的更深入的见解,突出了定制建议和协作决策过程的复杂性。卫生专业人员明确表示需要疫苗接种培训,特别是在了解有效的医患沟通方面。结论:这些发现强调了实施有针对性的干预措施以支持医护人员的价值,例如通过提供疫苗接种知识和沟通方面的培训,以提高他们解决患者对疫苗接种问题的信心。最终,根据技能和知识需求,这有助于提高疫苗接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating vaccine confidence: A mixed methods study investigating healthcare providers' perspectives across four non-EU European regions.

Background: Vaccine confidence remains a global public health challenge, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public trust in vaccines is crucial, with healthcare providers (HCPs) playing a pivotal role in navigating this sensitive topic. This requires an understanding of HCPs' perceptions of vaccines. Most European studies focus solely on the 27 EU countries, with sparse evidence available among other European countries. This study aims to expand the scope of HCPs' vaccine confidence oversight into European regions where limited research has been conducted thus far.

Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine vaccine confidence among HCPs (general practitioners and nurses) in six European countries outside of the EU: North Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina (Balkans), Belarus (Eastern Europe), Armenia, Georgia (Caucasus), and Kazakhstan (Central Asia). Quantitative surveys (N = 600) assessed vaccine confidence levels and recommendation practices, which were analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative interviews (N = 30) provided deeper insights into HCPs' perceptions of vaccination, role, and training needs, and were processed using NVivo.

Results: Findings revealed varying levels of vaccine confidence among HCPs across the six countries. The quantitative survey indicated disparities in confidence levels, with Belarus and Kazakhstan exhibiting notably lower confidence in vaccines. North Macedonia stands out as the country where HCPs are most confident about their role in encouraging vaccination, while the remaining five countries share similar lower levels. Qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into HCP perspectives, highlighting the complexities of tailoring recommendations and the collaborative decision-making process. HCPs expressed a clear need for training on vaccination, particularly in understanding effective doctor-patient communication.

Conclusions: These findings underscore the value of implementing targeted interventions to support HCPs, for example by providing training in vaccination knowledge and communication to improve their confidence in addressing patient concerns about vaccination. Ultimately, responding to skills and knowledge needs, this can contribute to improved vaccine acceptance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barriers to influenza vaccination during pregnancy in France: A national population-based study. Trends in costs of routinely recommended vaccines in the United States, 2001-2023. Anti-neuraminidase and anti-hemagglutinin stalk responses to different influenza a(H7N9) vaccine regimens. Association between underlying conditions, multimorbidity, and COVID-19 vaccination status of adults aged ≥80 years old in Beijing, China. Looking back at the 27th Academic Conference of the Japanese Society for Vaccinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1