登革热患者疲劳和感染后疲劳的全球患病率和危险因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103041
Nuzul Sri Hertanti, Trung V Nguyen, Yeu-Hui Chuang
{"title":"登革热患者疲劳和感染后疲劳的全球患病率和危险因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Nuzul Sri Hertanti, Trung V Nguyen, Yeu-Hui Chuang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue during the acute phase of dengue infection can persist as post-infectious fatigue (PIF), potentially impacting quality of life. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024543058). We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL from their inception to June 22, 2024. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of fatigue or PIF among dengue patients were included. We excluded case studies, review articles, conference abstracts, protocols, duplicate publications, and studies without full text. Quality assessment was performed using Hoy's risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.3. A random-effects model pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factors were identified using odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs or <i>p</i> values. Heterogeneity, moderator analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 715 identified studies, 40 were included for review. Of these, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis for fatigue prevalence and nine studies for PIF prevalence, respectively involving 37,790 and 5045 dengue patients. The pooled prevalence of fatigue was 59.0% (95% CI 0.47-0.70), and that of PIF was 20.0% (95% CI 0.10-0.36), with significant heterogeneity but no significant moderators. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this meta-analysis. Female sex (pooled OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.27-2.14), dengue hemorrhagic fever (pooled OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.16), and preexisting comorbidities (pooled OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.36-3.38) were significant risk factors for PIF.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the high prevalence of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients, with several risk factors identified. Although the study has its limitations, these results can inform future studies to more standardized study designs, improved definitions, and systematic assessment methods for fatigue, PIF, and potential moderators. These are essential to better understand the mechanisms of fatigue in dengue patients and explore potential interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"103041"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global prevalence and risk factors of fatigue and post-infectious fatigue among patients with dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nuzul Sri Hertanti, Trung V Nguyen, Yeu-Hui Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue during the acute phase of dengue infection can persist as post-infectious fatigue (PIF), potentially impacting quality of life. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024543058). We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL from their inception to June 22, 2024. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of fatigue or PIF among dengue patients were included. We excluded case studies, review articles, conference abstracts, protocols, duplicate publications, and studies without full text. Quality assessment was performed using Hoy's risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.3. A random-effects model pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factors were identified using odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs or <i>p</i> values. Heterogeneity, moderator analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 715 identified studies, 40 were included for review. Of these, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis for fatigue prevalence and nine studies for PIF prevalence, respectively involving 37,790 and 5045 dengue patients. The pooled prevalence of fatigue was 59.0% (95% CI 0.47-0.70), and that of PIF was 20.0% (95% CI 0.10-0.36), with significant heterogeneity but no significant moderators. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this meta-analysis. Female sex (pooled OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.27-2.14), dengue hemorrhagic fever (pooled OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.16), and preexisting comorbidities (pooled OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.36-3.38) were significant risk factors for PIF.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the high prevalence of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients, with several risk factors identified. Although the study has its limitations, these results can inform future studies to more standardized study designs, improved definitions, and systematic assessment methods for fatigue, PIF, and potential moderators. These are essential to better understand the mechanisms of fatigue in dengue patients and explore potential interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"103041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:登革热感染急性期的疲劳可以持续为感染后疲劳(PIF),潜在地影响生活质量。我们的目的是确定登革热患者中疲劳和PIF的患病率和危险因素。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析在PROSPERO (CRD42024543058)中注册。我们检索了PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase和CINAHL,从它们成立到2024年6月22日。报告登革热患者中疲劳或PIF患病率的观察性研究被纳入。我们排除了案例研究、综述文章、会议摘要、协议、重复出版物和没有全文的研究。采用Hoy偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。数据分析采用R软件4.3.3版。随机效应模型以95%置信区间(ci)汇总了患病率。使用奇比(or)和95% ci或p值确定危险因素。异质性、调节因素分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚也进行了评估。研究结果:从715项确定的研究中,有40项纳入了综述。其中,37项研究纳入了疲劳患病率的荟萃分析,9项研究纳入了PIF患病率的荟萃分析,分别涉及37,790和5045名登革热患者。疲劳的总患病率为59.0% (95% CI 0.47-0.70), PIF的总患病率为20.0% (95% CI 0.10-0.36),具有显著的异质性,但没有显著的调节因子。敏感性分析证实了该meta分析的稳健性。女性(合并OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.27-2.14)、登革出血热(合并OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.16)和既往合并症(合并OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.36-3.38)是PIF的重要危险因素。该荟萃分析强调了登革热患者中疲劳和PIF的高患病率,并确定了几个危险因素。尽管该研究有其局限性,但这些结果可以为未来的研究提供更标准化的研究设计、改进的定义和系统的疲劳、PIF和潜在调节因子的评估方法。这些对于更好地了解登革热患者疲劳的机制和探索潜在的干预措施至关重要。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global prevalence and risk factors of fatigue and post-infectious fatigue among patients with dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Fatigue during the acute phase of dengue infection can persist as post-infectious fatigue (PIF), potentially impacting quality of life. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024543058). We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL from their inception to June 22, 2024. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of fatigue or PIF among dengue patients were included. We excluded case studies, review articles, conference abstracts, protocols, duplicate publications, and studies without full text. Quality assessment was performed using Hoy's risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.3. A random-effects model pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factors were identified using odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs or p values. Heterogeneity, moderator analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed.

Findings: From 715 identified studies, 40 were included for review. Of these, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis for fatigue prevalence and nine studies for PIF prevalence, respectively involving 37,790 and 5045 dengue patients. The pooled prevalence of fatigue was 59.0% (95% CI 0.47-0.70), and that of PIF was 20.0% (95% CI 0.10-0.36), with significant heterogeneity but no significant moderators. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this meta-analysis. Female sex (pooled OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.27-2.14), dengue hemorrhagic fever (pooled OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.16), and preexisting comorbidities (pooled OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.36-3.38) were significant risk factors for PIF.

Interpretation: This meta-analysis highlights the high prevalence of fatigue and PIF among dengue patients, with several risk factors identified. Although the study has its limitations, these results can inform future studies to more standardized study designs, improved definitions, and systematic assessment methods for fatigue, PIF, and potential moderators. These are essential to better understand the mechanisms of fatigue in dengue patients and explore potential interventions.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Economic evaluation of alternative hepatitis C treatment options: a post hoc analysis of the VIETNARMS trial. Celiac plexus radiosurgery for retroperitoneal pain in advanced cancer: a pre-specified secondary analysis of health-related quality of life in a phase II single-arm trial. A Europe-wide provider perspective of healthcare services for adolescent and young adult patients with haematological conditions: a survey from the Adolescent and Young Adult Taskforce of the European Hematology Association. The phenotypic spectrum and genetic determinants of severe spinal muscular atrophy in individuals with a single SMN2 copy: an international retrospective observational study. The role of genetic liability for psychiatric disorders and personality traits in post covid syndrome: data from three Nordic population cohorts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1