用三维CMR心肌应变估计风湿性心脏病患者双心室弹性材料参数。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112524
Mary A. Familusi , Sebastian Skatulla , Jagir R. Hussan , Olukayode O. Aremu , Stephen Jermy , Daniel Mutithu , Freedom N. Gumedze , Ntobeko A.B. Ntusi
{"title":"用三维CMR心肌应变估计风湿性心脏病患者双心室弹性材料参数。","authors":"Mary A. Familusi ,&nbsp;Sebastian Skatulla ,&nbsp;Jagir R. Hussan ,&nbsp;Olukayode O. Aremu ,&nbsp;Stephen Jermy ,&nbsp;Daniel Mutithu ,&nbsp;Freedom N. Gumedze ,&nbsp;Ntobeko A.B. Ntusi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the elastic material behavior of myocardium during the diastolic phase is critical for evaluating cardiac function and improving treatments for diastolic abnormalities. This study introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework that incorporates both strain and volume measurements to enhance the accuracy of myocardial property assessments in Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) patients and healthy controls. By employing global volume and strain measurements instead of segmented strains from the sixteen AHA regions, we achieve a robust alignment with the Klotz curve across all groups, indicating an accurate simulation of end-diastolic pressure–volume relationships (EDPVRs). Our approach uniquely integrates combinations of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains, resulting in an unprecedented reduction in errors between clinical and simulated strain values, with less than one percent difference for targeted parameters. The results demonstrate that the alignment between computational predictions and clinical measurements depends significantly on the choice of optimization target. The study reveals significant differences in tissue mechanics between RHD patients and healthy controls, with notable variations in ventricular stiffness and fiber orientations across optimization targets, confirmed through rigorous statistical analyses. The observed variations in fiber angles, particularly the smaller angles for longitudinal strains and steeper angles for circumferential strains, underscore the intricate relationship between myocardial fiber architecture and cardiac deformation, offering deeper insights into ventricular biomechanics. By presenting qualitative and quantitative differences in stress and strain distributions, this research advances the understanding of myocardial mechanics, highlighting the clinical relevance of fiber orientation and material properties in modeling cardiac mechanics and distinguishing diseased from healthy myocardial behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 112524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-ventricular elastic material parameters estimation using 3D CMR myocardial strains in rheumatic heart disease patients\",\"authors\":\"Mary A. Familusi ,&nbsp;Sebastian Skatulla ,&nbsp;Jagir R. Hussan ,&nbsp;Olukayode O. Aremu ,&nbsp;Stephen Jermy ,&nbsp;Daniel Mutithu ,&nbsp;Freedom N. Gumedze ,&nbsp;Ntobeko A.B. Ntusi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the elastic material behavior of myocardium during the diastolic phase is critical for evaluating cardiac function and improving treatments for diastolic abnormalities. This study introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework that incorporates both strain and volume measurements to enhance the accuracy of myocardial property assessments in Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) patients and healthy controls. By employing global volume and strain measurements instead of segmented strains from the sixteen AHA regions, we achieve a robust alignment with the Klotz curve across all groups, indicating an accurate simulation of end-diastolic pressure–volume relationships (EDPVRs). Our approach uniquely integrates combinations of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains, resulting in an unprecedented reduction in errors between clinical and simulated strain values, with less than one percent difference for targeted parameters. The results demonstrate that the alignment between computational predictions and clinical measurements depends significantly on the choice of optimization target. The study reveals significant differences in tissue mechanics between RHD patients and healthy controls, with notable variations in ventricular stiffness and fiber orientations across optimization targets, confirmed through rigorous statistical analyses. The observed variations in fiber angles, particularly the smaller angles for longitudinal strains and steeper angles for circumferential strains, underscore the intricate relationship between myocardial fiber architecture and cardiac deformation, offering deeper insights into ventricular biomechanics. By presenting qualitative and quantitative differences in stress and strain distributions, this research advances the understanding of myocardial mechanics, highlighting the clinical relevance of fiber orientation and material properties in modeling cardiac mechanics and distinguishing diseased from healthy myocardial behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025000351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025000351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解舒张期心肌的弹性物质行为对评估心功能和改善舒张期异常的治疗至关重要。本研究引入了一种新的多目标优化框架,该框架结合应变和体积测量,以提高风湿性心脏病(RHD)患者和健康对照者心肌特性评估的准确性。通过采用整体体积和应变测量,而不是来自16个AHA区域的分段应变,我们在所有组中实现了与Klotz曲线的稳健对准,表明舒张末期压力-体积关系(EDPVRs)的准确模拟。我们的方法独特地集成了纵向、周向和径向应变的组合,从而前所未有地减少了临床和模拟应变值之间的误差,目标参数的差异小于1%。结果表明,计算预测与临床测量的一致性在很大程度上取决于优化目标的选择。研究发现,RHD患者与健康对照者在组织力学方面存在显著差异,优化目标之间的心室刚度和纤维取向存在显著差异,这一点通过严格的统计分析得到了证实。观察到的纤维角度的变化,特别是纵向应变的小角度和周向应变的大角度,强调了心肌纤维结构和心脏变形之间的复杂关系,为心室生物力学提供了更深入的见解。通过描述应力和应变分布的定性和定量差异,本研究推进了对心肌力学的理解,强调了纤维取向和材料特性在建模心脏力学和区分患病和健康心肌行为方面的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bi-ventricular elastic material parameters estimation using 3D CMR myocardial strains in rheumatic heart disease patients
Understanding the elastic material behavior of myocardium during the diastolic phase is critical for evaluating cardiac function and improving treatments for diastolic abnormalities. This study introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework that incorporates both strain and volume measurements to enhance the accuracy of myocardial property assessments in Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) patients and healthy controls. By employing global volume and strain measurements instead of segmented strains from the sixteen AHA regions, we achieve a robust alignment with the Klotz curve across all groups, indicating an accurate simulation of end-diastolic pressure–volume relationships (EDPVRs). Our approach uniquely integrates combinations of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains, resulting in an unprecedented reduction in errors between clinical and simulated strain values, with less than one percent difference for targeted parameters. The results demonstrate that the alignment between computational predictions and clinical measurements depends significantly on the choice of optimization target. The study reveals significant differences in tissue mechanics between RHD patients and healthy controls, with notable variations in ventricular stiffness and fiber orientations across optimization targets, confirmed through rigorous statistical analyses. The observed variations in fiber angles, particularly the smaller angles for longitudinal strains and steeper angles for circumferential strains, underscore the intricate relationship between myocardial fiber architecture and cardiac deformation, offering deeper insights into ventricular biomechanics. By presenting qualitative and quantitative differences in stress and strain distributions, this research advances the understanding of myocardial mechanics, highlighting the clinical relevance of fiber orientation and material properties in modeling cardiac mechanics and distinguishing diseased from healthy myocardial behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of task-specific biomechanical control strategies during sit-to-stand-to-sit in patients with knee osteoarthritis Early kinetic responses enhance biomechanical discrimination of falls and recoveries during sudden bilateral slips Decreased change of direction angle, increased ACL load: angle-dependent anterior cruciate ligament loading across different change of direction sprints in male soccer players Critical velocity metric derived from dynamic finite element analysis classifies hip fracture risk in a clinical cohort Body mass index moderates the effects of midsole hardness on metatarsophalangeal joint biomechanics during running in male recreational runners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1