开颅手术后颅内压监测与预后相关吗?

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.045
Peter Aziz MS , Alison Muller MSPH, MLS (ASCP) , Christopher Butts PhD, DO , Eugene F. Reilly MD , Anthony Martin MBA, BSN , Christopher Lawson MD , Thomas A. Geng DO , Adrian W. Ong MD
{"title":"开颅手术后颅内压监测与预后相关吗?","authors":"Peter Aziz MS ,&nbsp;Alison Muller MSPH, MLS (ASCP) ,&nbsp;Christopher Butts PhD, DO ,&nbsp;Eugene F. Reilly MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Martin MBA, BSN ,&nbsp;Christopher Lawson MD ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Geng DO ,&nbsp;Adrian W. Ong MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>It is unclear if intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) after open cranial procedures (craniotomy or craniectomy) (OC) for traumatic brain injury is associated with mortality. We hypothesized that ICPM placed early after OC was associated with lower mortality compared to no ICPM or delayed ICPM placement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using 2020-2021 data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, patients ≥16 y from level 1 and 2 trauma centers who underwent OC were divided into two groups: ICPM placed within 72 h of OC (early) and no ICPM or ICPM placed after 72 h (none/delayed). Outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to elucidate predictors of mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 19,830 patients (early ICPM, 29%) were included. Early patients were more likely to be from level 1 centers (63% <em>versus</em> 60%, <em>P</em> = 0.004), younger (median age 47 <em>versus</em> 60, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), to have a lower Glasgow Coma Score (median, 6 <em>versus</em> 14, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), higher injury severity score (median, 26 <em>versus</em> 26, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), an unreactive pupil (33% <em>versus</em> 18%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), midline shift &gt;5 mm (69% <em>versus</em> 60%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), received ≥2 units of blood/first 4 h (14% <em>versus</em> 6%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and higher mortality (31% <em>versus</em> 19%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) compared to none/delayed patients. Controlled for significant variables, early ICPM was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.47). Analysis of subjects with isolated brain injury found a similar association (odds ratio 1.32, 95% C1 1.15-1.52).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICPM placed within 72 h of OC was associated with increased mortality. Indications for ICPM after OC should be investigated further in multicenter prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"Pages 344-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Intracranial Pressure Monitoring After Open Cranial Procedures Associated With Outcome?\",\"authors\":\"Peter Aziz MS ,&nbsp;Alison Muller MSPH, MLS (ASCP) ,&nbsp;Christopher Butts PhD, DO ,&nbsp;Eugene F. Reilly MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Martin MBA, BSN ,&nbsp;Christopher Lawson MD ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Geng DO ,&nbsp;Adrian W. Ong MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>It is unclear if intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) after open cranial procedures (craniotomy or craniectomy) (OC) for traumatic brain injury is associated with mortality. We hypothesized that ICPM placed early after OC was associated with lower mortality compared to no ICPM or delayed ICPM placement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using 2020-2021 data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, patients ≥16 y from level 1 and 2 trauma centers who underwent OC were divided into two groups: ICPM placed within 72 h of OC (early) and no ICPM or ICPM placed after 72 h (none/delayed). Outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to elucidate predictors of mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 19,830 patients (early ICPM, 29%) were included. Early patients were more likely to be from level 1 centers (63% <em>versus</em> 60%, <em>P</em> = 0.004), younger (median age 47 <em>versus</em> 60, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), to have a lower Glasgow Coma Score (median, 6 <em>versus</em> 14, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), higher injury severity score (median, 26 <em>versus</em> 26, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), an unreactive pupil (33% <em>versus</em> 18%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), midline shift &gt;5 mm (69% <em>versus</em> 60%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), received ≥2 units of blood/first 4 h (14% <em>versus</em> 6%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and higher mortality (31% <em>versus</em> 19%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) compared to none/delayed patients. Controlled for significant variables, early ICPM was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.47). Analysis of subjects with isolated brain injury found a similar association (odds ratio 1.32, 95% C1 1.15-1.52).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICPM placed within 72 h of OC was associated with increased mortality. Indications for ICPM after OC should be investigated further in multicenter prospective studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"306 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 344-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚外伤性脑损伤开颅手术(开颅或开颅)(OC)后颅内压监测(ICPM)是否与死亡率相关。我们假设,与不放置ICPM或延迟放置ICPM相比,在OC后早期放置ICPM与较低的死亡率相关。方法:使用美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划2020-2021年的数据,将来自1级和2级创伤中心的≥16岁的接受OC的患者分为两组:在OC后72小时内放置ICPM(早期),未放置ICPM或72小时后放置ICPM(无/延迟)。结果是住院死亡率。使用逻辑回归来阐明死亡率的预测因素。结果:共纳入19830例患者(早期ICPM占29%)。早期患者更有可能来自1级中心(63%对60%,P = 0.004),更年轻(中位年龄47对60,P = 5 mm, 69%对60%,P)。结论:在OC发生后72小时内放置ICPM与死亡率增加相关。在多中心前瞻性研究中,应进一步调查术后ICPM的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Intracranial Pressure Monitoring After Open Cranial Procedures Associated With Outcome?

Introduction

It is unclear if intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) after open cranial procedures (craniotomy or craniectomy) (OC) for traumatic brain injury is associated with mortality. We hypothesized that ICPM placed early after OC was associated with lower mortality compared to no ICPM or delayed ICPM placement.

Methods

Using 2020-2021 data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, patients ≥16 y from level 1 and 2 trauma centers who underwent OC were divided into two groups: ICPM placed within 72 h of OC (early) and no ICPM or ICPM placed after 72 h (none/delayed). Outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to elucidate predictors of mortality.

Results

A total of 19,830 patients (early ICPM, 29%) were included. Early patients were more likely to be from level 1 centers (63% versus 60%, P = 0.004), younger (median age 47 versus 60, P < 0.0001), to have a lower Glasgow Coma Score (median, 6 versus 14, P < 0.0001), higher injury severity score (median, 26 versus 26, P < 0.0001), an unreactive pupil (33% versus 18%, P < 0.0001), midline shift >5 mm (69% versus 60%, P < 0.0001), received ≥2 units of blood/first 4 h (14% versus 6%, P < 0.0001) and higher mortality (31% versus 19%, P < 0.0001) compared to none/delayed patients. Controlled for significant variables, early ICPM was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.47). Analysis of subjects with isolated brain injury found a similar association (odds ratio 1.32, 95% C1 1.15-1.52).

Conclusions

ICPM placed within 72 h of OC was associated with increased mortality. Indications for ICPM after OC should be investigated further in multicenter prospective studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Prediction of Hospital Stay in Pediatric Typhoid Intestinal Perforation: Pilot Study The Optimal Timing of Portal and Hepatic Vein Ligation for Increasing Liver Remnant Volume in Rats Timing of Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Nationwide Analysis Ten Year Review of Wound Culture Results and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in a Burn Center Effect of TU-100 on Colorectal Liver Metastasis in Mouse Model of MASH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1