时间尺度上使用均值和标准差的元分析中对数正态标准差之比精确广义置信区间的泰勒级数逼近。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutical Statistics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pst.2467
Pei-Fu Chen, Franklin Dexter
{"title":"时间尺度上使用均值和标准差的元分析中对数正态标准差之比精确广义置信区间的泰勒级数逼近。","authors":"Pei-Fu Chen, Franklin Dexter","doi":"10.1002/pst.2467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With contemporary anesthetic drugs, the efficacy of general anesthesia is assured. Health-economic and clinical objectives are related to reductions in the variability in dosing, variability in recovery, etc. Consequently, meta-analyses for anesthesiology research would benefit from quantification of ratios of standard deviations of log-normally distributed variables (e.g., surgical duration). Generalized confidence intervals can be used, once sample means and standard deviations in the raw, time, scale, for each study and group have been used to estimate the mean and standard deviation of the logarithms of the times (i.e., \"log-scale\"). We examine the matching of the first two moments versus also using higher-order terms, following Higgins et al. 2008 and Friedrich et al. 2012. Monte Carlo simulations revealed that using the first two moments 95% confidence intervals had coverage 92%-95%, with small bias. Use of higher-order moments worsened confidence interval coverage for the log ratios, especially for coefficients of variation in the time scale of 50% and for larger <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(n=50\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> sample sizes per group, resulting in 88% coverage. We recommend that for calculating confidence intervals for ratios of standard deviations based on generalized pivotal quantities and log-normal distributions, when relying on transformation of sample statistics from time to log scale, use the first two moments, not the higher order terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 1","pages":"e2467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taylor Series Approximation for Accurate Generalized Confidence Intervals of Ratios of Log-Normal Standard Deviations for Meta-Analysis Using Means and Standard Deviations in Time Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Fu Chen, Franklin Dexter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pst.2467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With contemporary anesthetic drugs, the efficacy of general anesthesia is assured. Health-economic and clinical objectives are related to reductions in the variability in dosing, variability in recovery, etc. Consequently, meta-analyses for anesthesiology research would benefit from quantification of ratios of standard deviations of log-normally distributed variables (e.g., surgical duration). Generalized confidence intervals can be used, once sample means and standard deviations in the raw, time, scale, for each study and group have been used to estimate the mean and standard deviation of the logarithms of the times (i.e., \\\"log-scale\\\"). We examine the matching of the first two moments versus also using higher-order terms, following Higgins et al. 2008 and Friedrich et al. 2012. Monte Carlo simulations revealed that using the first two moments 95% confidence intervals had coverage 92%-95%, with small bias. Use of higher-order moments worsened confidence interval coverage for the log ratios, especially for coefficients of variation in the time scale of 50% and for larger <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mfenced><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn></mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(n=50\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> sample sizes per group, resulting in 88% coverage. We recommend that for calculating confidence intervals for ratios of standard deviations based on generalized pivotal quantities and log-normal distributions, when relying on transformation of sample statistics from time to log scale, use the first two moments, not the higher order terms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"e2467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有了现代麻醉药物,全身麻醉的疗效得到了保证。健康、经济和临床目标与减少剂量的可变性、恢复的可变性等有关。因此,麻醉学研究的荟萃分析将受益于对数正态分布变量(如手术时间)的标准偏差比率的量化。一旦使用每个研究和组的原始、时间、规模的样本均值和标准差来估计时间对数的均值和标准差(即“对数尺度”),就可以使用广义置信区间。继Higgins等人2008年和Friedrich等人2012年之后,我们研究了前两个矩与使用高阶项的匹配。蒙特卡罗模拟显示,利用前两个力矩95% confidence intervals had coverage 92%-95%, with small bias. Use of higher-order moments worsened confidence interval coverage for the log ratios, especially for coefficients of variation in the time scale of 50% and for larger n = 50 $$ \left(n=50\right) $$ sample sizes per group, resulting in 88% coverage. We recommend that for calculating confidence intervals for ratios of standard deviations based on generalized pivotal quantities and log-normal distributions, when relying on transformation of sample statistics from time to log scale, use the first two moments, not the higher order terms.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taylor Series Approximation for Accurate Generalized Confidence Intervals of Ratios of Log-Normal Standard Deviations for Meta-Analysis Using Means and Standard Deviations in Time Scale.

With contemporary anesthetic drugs, the efficacy of general anesthesia is assured. Health-economic and clinical objectives are related to reductions in the variability in dosing, variability in recovery, etc. Consequently, meta-analyses for anesthesiology research would benefit from quantification of ratios of standard deviations of log-normally distributed variables (e.g., surgical duration). Generalized confidence intervals can be used, once sample means and standard deviations in the raw, time, scale, for each study and group have been used to estimate the mean and standard deviation of the logarithms of the times (i.e., "log-scale"). We examine the matching of the first two moments versus also using higher-order terms, following Higgins et al. 2008 and Friedrich et al. 2012. Monte Carlo simulations revealed that using the first two moments 95% confidence intervals had coverage 92%-95%, with small bias. Use of higher-order moments worsened confidence interval coverage for the log ratios, especially for coefficients of variation in the time scale of 50% and for larger n = 50 $$ \left(n=50\right) $$ sample sizes per group, resulting in 88% coverage. We recommend that for calculating confidence intervals for ratios of standard deviations based on generalized pivotal quantities and log-normal distributions, when relying on transformation of sample statistics from time to log scale, use the first two moments, not the higher order terms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
期刊最新文献
A Constrained Hierarchical Bayesian Model Considering Latent Biomarker Subgroups for Time-To-Event Endpoints in Randomized Phase II Trials. RABOTS: A Randomized Adaptive Bayesian Optimization Two-Stage Seamless Design for Dose Optimization and Proof-of-Concept Evaluation. Integrating Preclinical Insights for Adaptive Dose Escalation in Phase I Oncology Trials. A Seamless Two-Stage Phase I/II Trial Design With Backfill and Joint Monitoring for Dose Optimization. Consistency Assessment and Regional Sample Size Calculation for MRCT Under Random Effects Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1