了解比利时COVID期间的超额死亡率:先前健康状况和社会因素的影响

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01499-2
Laura Van den Borre, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Sylvie Gadeyne, Katrien Vanthomme, Didier Willaert
{"title":"了解比利时COVID期间的超额死亡率:先前健康状况和社会因素的影响","authors":"Laura Van den Borre, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Sylvie Gadeyne, Katrien Vanthomme, Didier Willaert","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01499-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to investigate how pre-existing health status and social background contribute to excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consists of almost 1.4 million adult members of Solidaris, the second largest health insurance fund in Belgium. Pre-existing health status was identified using health care reimbursement data, including medication use. Social characteristics included a proxy for low socio-economic status, nationality of origin, and living arrangement. Excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis was measured by computing the relative difference between all-cause mortality in 2020 or 2021 and the average yearly mortality in 2015-2019. Directly Standardised Mortality Rates (DSMRs) were calculated to investigate absolute mortality inequalities. Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) were computed using Poisson regression analyses to investigate relative mortality inequalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSMRs show that persons with no previous disease experienced significant excess mortality in 2020, like men with one, two or three diseases and women with various numbers of pre-existing diseases. Results by specific disease show heterogenous results. After adjusting for age, sex and social characteristics, persons with cancer experienced a significant mortality deficit of 17% in 2020 and of 9% in 2021. For persons with cancer and asthma or COPD, significant mortality deficits of 10% and  3% were observed in 2020 and 2021, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into the complex dynamics of mortality during the COVID-19 crisis, emphasising the need to consider individual-level information on pre-existing health and social background jointly.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding excess mortality during COVID in Belgium: the influence of pre-existing health status and social factors.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Van den Borre, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Sylvie Gadeyne, Katrien Vanthomme, Didier Willaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01499-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to investigate how pre-existing health status and social background contribute to excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consists of almost 1.4 million adult members of Solidaris, the second largest health insurance fund in Belgium. Pre-existing health status was identified using health care reimbursement data, including medication use. Social characteristics included a proxy for low socio-economic status, nationality of origin, and living arrangement. Excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis was measured by computing the relative difference between all-cause mortality in 2020 or 2021 and the average yearly mortality in 2015-2019. Directly Standardised Mortality Rates (DSMRs) were calculated to investigate absolute mortality inequalities. Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) were computed using Poisson regression analyses to investigate relative mortality inequalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSMRs show that persons with no previous disease experienced significant excess mortality in 2020, like men with one, two or three diseases and women with various numbers of pre-existing diseases. Results by specific disease show heterogenous results. After adjusting for age, sex and social characteristics, persons with cancer experienced a significant mortality deficit of 17% in 2020 and of 9% in 2021. For persons with cancer and asthma or COPD, significant mortality deficits of 10% and  3% were observed in 2020 and 2021, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into the complex dynamics of mortality during the COVID-19 crisis, emphasising the need to consider individual-level information on pre-existing health and social background jointly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756169/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01499-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01499-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在调查比利时COVID-19危机期间原有健康状况和社会背景如何导致死亡率过高。方法:研究人群包括近140万成年成员Solidaris,第二大健康保险基金在比利时。使用医疗保健报销数据(包括药物使用情况)确定先前的健康状况。社会特征包括低社会经济地位、原籍国籍和生活安排。通过计算2020年或2021年全因死亡率与2015-2019年平均年死亡率之间的相对差异,衡量了COVID-19危机期间的超额死亡率。计算直接标准化死亡率(DSMRs)以调查绝对死亡率不平等。使用泊松回归分析计算死亡率比(MRRs),以调查相对死亡率不平等。结果:DSMRs显示,在2020年,没有既往疾病的人出现了明显的超额死亡率,比如患有一种、两种或三种疾病的男性,以及患有不同数量既往疾病的女性。特定疾病的结果呈现异质性。在对年龄、性别和社会特征进行调整后,癌症患者的死亡率在2020年大幅下降17%,在2021年下降9%。对于患有癌症和哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺病的人,在2020年和2021年分别观察到10%和3%的显著死亡率下降。结论:该研究为COVID-19危机期间死亡率的复杂动态提供了见解,强调需要综合考虑个人层面的先前健康和社会背景信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding excess mortality during COVID in Belgium: the influence of pre-existing health status and social factors.

Background: This study aims to investigate how pre-existing health status and social background contribute to excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium.

Methods: The study population consists of almost 1.4 million adult members of Solidaris, the second largest health insurance fund in Belgium. Pre-existing health status was identified using health care reimbursement data, including medication use. Social characteristics included a proxy for low socio-economic status, nationality of origin, and living arrangement. Excess mortality during the COVID-19 crisis was measured by computing the relative difference between all-cause mortality in 2020 or 2021 and the average yearly mortality in 2015-2019. Directly Standardised Mortality Rates (DSMRs) were calculated to investigate absolute mortality inequalities. Mortality Rate Ratios (MRRs) were computed using Poisson regression analyses to investigate relative mortality inequalities.

Results: DSMRs show that persons with no previous disease experienced significant excess mortality in 2020, like men with one, two or three diseases and women with various numbers of pre-existing diseases. Results by specific disease show heterogenous results. After adjusting for age, sex and social characteristics, persons with cancer experienced a significant mortality deficit of 17% in 2020 and of 9% in 2021. For persons with cancer and asthma or COPD, significant mortality deficits of 10% and  3% were observed in 2020 and 2021, respectively.

Conclusion: The study provides insights into the complex dynamics of mortality during the COVID-19 crisis, emphasising the need to consider individual-level information on pre-existing health and social background jointly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination. Methodological heterogeneity and equity challenges of distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare: a systematic review from 2017 to 2025. Reasons for HIV testing in women diagnosed with HIV (2000-2023): insights from a 24-year retrospective cohort study in Barcelona, Spain. Non-pharmacological interventions for improving sleep quality in adults aged 50 years and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1