Sun-Kyung Park, Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Jin-Tae Kim
{"title":"经腹平面阻滞联合鞘内芬太尼与鞘内吗啡用于剖宫产后镇痛:一项随机非劣效性临床试验。","authors":"Sun-Kyung Park, Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Jin-Tae Kim","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04824274.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"330-336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transversus abdominis plane block combined with intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sun-Kyung Park, Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Jin-Tae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-106044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04824274.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"330-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鞘内吗啡是剖宫产后镇痛的标准,但经常引起瘙痒,在资源有限的情况下可能无法获得。本研究评估了在剖宫产后多模式镇痛情况下,双侧经腹平面(TAP)阻滞和鞘内芬太尼联合使用是否比鞘内吗啡提供非亚次镇痛。方法:80名母亲随机接受鞘内芬太尼10µg +双侧TAP阻断(每侧15 mL 0.375%罗哌卡因)(TF组)或鞘内吗啡75µg +生理盐水假阻断(M组)。所有患者均接受标准的多模式镇痛。主要结局是术后24小时的疼痛和运动评分,在数值评定量表上的非劣效差为1。次要结局包括阿片类药物消耗、获得首个阿片类药物的时间、瘙痒、恶心/呕吐、患者满意度和新生儿结局。结果:TF组24小时运动时疼痛平均评分为5.4分,M组为4.8分(平均差异(95% CI)为0.6 (-0.3 ~ 1.5),p=0.202), 95% CI上边界超过非下边界。TF组术后芬太尼用量较高(中位数(IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140(55-405)µg;结论:双侧剖宫产后穿刺阻滞鞘内芬太尼的镇痛效果优于鞘内吗啡。然而,鞘内吗啡与瘙痒的发生率较高相关,这表明当减轻瘙痒是优先考虑的时候,用鞘内芬太尼阻断TAP是一种合适的选择。试验注册号:NCT04824274。
Transversus abdominis plane block combined with intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.
Background: Intrathecal morphine is the standard for post-cesarean analgesia but often causes pruritus and may be unavailable in resource-limited settings. This study assessed whether a combination of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and intrathecal fentanyl provides non-inferior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine following cesarean delivery within the multimodal analgesia context.
Methods: Eighty mothers were randomized to receive either intrathecal fentanyl 10 µg with bilateral TAP block using 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side (TF group) or intrathecal morphine 75 µg with a saline sham block (M group). All patients received standard multimodal analgesia. Primary outcome was pain score with movement at 24 hours postoperatively, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, time to first opioid, pruritus, nausea/vomiting, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.
Results: The mean pain score with movement at 24 hours was 5.4 in the TF group and 4.8 in the M group (mean difference (95% CI), 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5), p=0.202), with the upper margin of 95% CI exceeding the non-inferior margin. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in the TF group (median (IQR), 585 (390-745) vs 140 (55-405) µg; p<0.001). Pruritus was more frequent in the M group (60% vs 10%; p<0.001).
Conclusions: Bilateral TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl is not non-inferior to intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. However, intrathecal morphine was associated with a higher incidence of pruritus, suggesting TAP block with intrathecal fentanyl as a suitable alternative when reducing pruritus is a priority.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).