早期和晚期抗生素预防足月早破的结果无差异:一项多中心分析。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.017
Dan Liu PhD , Lin Wu MD , Linan Zeng MD , Hailong Li MD , Yangyang Zhan MS , Lin Wang MS , Xu Zhang MS , Xuebin Li MS , Ya Ling MS , Peng Zhang MS , Huaiyu Su MS , Bing Peng MD , Honglin Wu MS , Lang Qin MD , Xiumei Liu MD , Yun Teng MS , Lin Li PhD , Aiyun Xing MD , Lingli Zhang MD
{"title":"早期和晚期抗生素预防足月早破的结果无差异:一项多中心分析。","authors":"Dan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Wu MD ,&nbsp;Linan Zeng MD ,&nbsp;Hailong Li MD ,&nbsp;Yangyang Zhan MS ,&nbsp;Lin Wang MS ,&nbsp;Xu Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Xuebin Li MS ,&nbsp;Ya Ling MS ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Huaiyu Su MS ,&nbsp;Bing Peng MD ,&nbsp;Honglin Wu MS ,&nbsp;Lang Qin MD ,&nbsp;Xiumei Liu MD ,&nbsp;Yun Teng MS ,&nbsp;Lin Li PhD ,&nbsp;Aiyun Xing MD ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although guidelines suggest administering antibiotics 12 to 18 hours after the rupture of membranes in women with term premature rupture of membranes, in practice, clinicians tend to initiate prophylactic antibiotics as soon as possible to avoid risk of infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess whether early administration of prophylactic antibiotics for term premature rupture of membranes reduces the incidence of maternal and neonatal infections.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>This multicenter prospective cohort study included women with term premature rupture of membranes. The participants were divided into early and late administration groups according to the duration between rupture of membranes and antibiotic use. The effectiveness outcomes included the incidence of puerperal infection, the incidence of total maternal infection, and the rate of neonatal sepsis, whereas the safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse reactions. Antibiotic use density was used to assess antibiotic consumption. The propensity score matching method was used to control for confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1099 women with term premature rupture of membranes were enrolled: 459 in the early 6-hour group (antibiotic administration within 6 hours) and 640 in the late 6-hour group (antibiotic administration after 6 hours) and 707 in the early 12-hour group (antibiotic administration within 12 hours) and 392 in the late 12-hour group (antibiotics administration after 12 hours). After propensity score matching, there were 300 women in each 6-hour group and 230 women in each 12-hour group. The baseline characteristics showed no significant difference between the matched groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). The early 6-hour and 12-hour groups had lower maternal C-reactive protein levels than the late 6-hour and 12-hour groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). However, no significant difference was observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Adverse reactions showed no statistically significant difference between the early and late treatment groups (<em>P</em>=1.000). Antibiotic use density was higher in the early treatment groups by 10.1 defined daily doses (6-hour groups) and 11.7 defined daily doses (12-hour groups).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was no substantial difference in the efficacy and safety of antibiotics administered within 6 to 12 hours after rupture of membranes compared with that administered after 6 to 12 hours in women with term premature rupture of membranes. Delayed antibiotic use substantially reduced antibiotic consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"233 2","pages":"Pages 129.e1-129.e13"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No difference in outcomes with early vs late antibiotic prophylaxis for term premature rupture of membranes: a multicenter analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Lin Wu MD ,&nbsp;Linan Zeng MD ,&nbsp;Hailong Li MD ,&nbsp;Yangyang Zhan MS ,&nbsp;Lin Wang MS ,&nbsp;Xu Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Xuebin Li MS ,&nbsp;Ya Ling MS ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Huaiyu Su MS ,&nbsp;Bing Peng MD ,&nbsp;Honglin Wu MS ,&nbsp;Lang Qin MD ,&nbsp;Xiumei Liu MD ,&nbsp;Yun Teng MS ,&nbsp;Lin Li PhD ,&nbsp;Aiyun Xing MD ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although guidelines suggest administering antibiotics 12 to 18 hours after the rupture of membranes in women with term premature rupture of membranes, in practice, clinicians tend to initiate prophylactic antibiotics as soon as possible to avoid risk of infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess whether early administration of prophylactic antibiotics for term premature rupture of membranes reduces the incidence of maternal and neonatal infections.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>This multicenter prospective cohort study included women with term premature rupture of membranes. The participants were divided into early and late administration groups according to the duration between rupture of membranes and antibiotic use. The effectiveness outcomes included the incidence of puerperal infection, the incidence of total maternal infection, and the rate of neonatal sepsis, whereas the safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse reactions. Antibiotic use density was used to assess antibiotic consumption. The propensity score matching method was used to control for confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1099 women with term premature rupture of membranes were enrolled: 459 in the early 6-hour group (antibiotic administration within 6 hours) and 640 in the late 6-hour group (antibiotic administration after 6 hours) and 707 in the early 12-hour group (antibiotic administration within 12 hours) and 392 in the late 12-hour group (antibiotics administration after 12 hours). After propensity score matching, there were 300 women in each 6-hour group and 230 women in each 12-hour group. The baseline characteristics showed no significant difference between the matched groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). The early 6-hour and 12-hour groups had lower maternal C-reactive protein levels than the late 6-hour and 12-hour groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). However, no significant difference was observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Adverse reactions showed no statistically significant difference between the early and late treatment groups (<em>P</em>=1.000). Antibiotic use density was higher in the early treatment groups by 10.1 defined daily doses (6-hour groups) and 11.7 defined daily doses (12-hour groups).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was no substantial difference in the efficacy and safety of antibiotics administered within 6 to 12 hours after rupture of membranes compared with that administered after 6 to 12 hours in women with term premature rupture of membranes. Delayed antibiotic use substantially reduced antibiotic consumption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"233 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 129.e1-129.e13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937825000316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937825000316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然指南建议足月胎膜早破(PROM)妇女在胎膜破裂后12至18小时使用抗生素,但在实践中,临床医生倾向于尽快开始预防性抗生素治疗,以避免感染风险。目的:本研究旨在评估足月胎膜早破早期给予预防性抗生素是否能降低孕产妇和新生儿感染的发生率。研究设计:这项多中心、前瞻性队列研究纳入了足月胎膜早破的妇女。根据膜破裂和抗生素使用之间的时间,参与者被分为早期和晚期给药组。疗效指标包括产褥期感染发生率、产妇总感染发生率、新生儿脓毒症发生率等;安全性指标包括不良反应发生率;抗生素使用密度评估抗生素的使用情况。采用倾向评分匹配法控制混杂。结果:共纳入1099例足月早PROM患者,其中早6小时组459例(6小时内给药),晚6小时组640例(6小时后给药);早12小时组(12小时内给药)707例,晚12小时组(12小时后给药)392例。倾向评分匹配后,6小时组各有300名女性,12小时组各有230名女性。配对组间基线特征差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。早期6小时和12小时组与晚期组相比,母体c反应蛋白水平较低(p结论:胎膜破裂后6-12小时内使用抗生素与6-12小时后使用抗生素在有效性和安全性方面无统计学差异。同时,延迟使用可显著减少抗生素的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No difference in outcomes with early vs late antibiotic prophylaxis for term premature rupture of membranes: a multicenter analysis

Background

Although guidelines suggest administering antibiotics 12 to 18 hours after the rupture of membranes in women with term premature rupture of membranes, in practice, clinicians tend to initiate prophylactic antibiotics as soon as possible to avoid risk of infection.

Objective

This study aimed to assess whether early administration of prophylactic antibiotics for term premature rupture of membranes reduces the incidence of maternal and neonatal infections.

Study Design

This multicenter prospective cohort study included women with term premature rupture of membranes. The participants were divided into early and late administration groups according to the duration between rupture of membranes and antibiotic use. The effectiveness outcomes included the incidence of puerperal infection, the incidence of total maternal infection, and the rate of neonatal sepsis, whereas the safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse reactions. Antibiotic use density was used to assess antibiotic consumption. The propensity score matching method was used to control for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1099 women with term premature rupture of membranes were enrolled: 459 in the early 6-hour group (antibiotic administration within 6 hours) and 640 in the late 6-hour group (antibiotic administration after 6 hours) and 707 in the early 12-hour group (antibiotic administration within 12 hours) and 392 in the late 12-hour group (antibiotics administration after 12 hours). After propensity score matching, there were 300 women in each 6-hour group and 230 women in each 12-hour group. The baseline characteristics showed no significant difference between the matched groups (P>.05). The early 6-hour and 12-hour groups had lower maternal C-reactive protein levels than the late 6-hour and 12-hour groups (P<.05). However, no significant difference was observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes (P<.05). Adverse reactions showed no statistically significant difference between the early and late treatment groups (P=1.000). Antibiotic use density was higher in the early treatment groups by 10.1 defined daily doses (6-hour groups) and 11.7 defined daily doses (12-hour groups).

Conclusion

There was no substantial difference in the efficacy and safety of antibiotics administered within 6 to 12 hours after rupture of membranes compared with that administered after 6 to 12 hours in women with term premature rupture of membranes. Delayed antibiotic use substantially reduced antibiotic consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Microbiome studies in chronic pelvic pain: addressing key methodological concerns (letter to the editor) Challenges in defining the primary outcome for postpartum hemorrhage (reply to letter to the editor) Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in spontaneous vaginal births in nulliparous pregnant individuals: a 21-year cohort study based on real-world data Methodologic and analytic considerations in the CANDLE trial of ibrexafungerp for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (letter to the editor) Methodologic and analytic considerations in the CANDLE trial of ibrexafungerp for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (reply to letter to the editor)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1