不同耕作制度和土壤质地下农田土壤中原核生物、真菌和原生生物的年际差异

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109732
Haotian Wang , Jingjing Yang , Damien R. Finn , Joachim Brunotte , Christoph C. Tebbe
{"title":"不同耕作制度和土壤质地下农田土壤中原核生物、真菌和原生生物的年际差异","authors":"Haotian Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Yang ,&nbsp;Damien R. Finn ,&nbsp;Joachim Brunotte ,&nbsp;Christoph C. Tebbe","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A sustainable use of croplands should utilize beneficial services provided by their resident soil microbiome. To identify potentially adverse environmental effects on soil microbiomes in the future, a better understanding of their natural variability is fundamental. Here, we characterized the abundance and diversity of soil microbial communities over 2 years at two-week intervals on three neighboring fields at an operational farm in Northern Germany. Field soils differed in texture (clay, loam) and tillage (soil conservation vs. conventional). PCR-amplicon analyses of soil DNA revealed distinct temporal variations of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists (Cercozoa and Endomyxa). Annual differences and seasonal effects on all microbial groups were detected. In addition to soil pH, prokaryotic communities varied with total soil C and N, but fungi with temperature and precipitation. The C/N ratio had contrasting effects on prokaryotic phyla and protistan classes, but all fungal phyla responded positively. Irrespective of the sampling date, prokaryotic and fungal but not protistan community compositions from the three soils were distinct. Compositional turnover rates were higher for fungi and protists than for prokaryotes and, for all, lower in clay. Conventional tillage had the strongest effect on protist diversity. In co-occurrence networks, most nodes were provided by prokaryotes, but highly connected nodes by predatory protists in the first, and by saprotrophic fungi in the second year. The temporal variation established here can provide insights of what is natural and thus below the limits of concern in detecting adverse effects on the soil microbiome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 109732"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct seasonal and annual variability of prokaryotes, fungi and protists in cropland soil under different tillage systems and soil texture\",\"authors\":\"Haotian Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Yang ,&nbsp;Damien R. Finn ,&nbsp;Joachim Brunotte ,&nbsp;Christoph C. Tebbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A sustainable use of croplands should utilize beneficial services provided by their resident soil microbiome. To identify potentially adverse environmental effects on soil microbiomes in the future, a better understanding of their natural variability is fundamental. Here, we characterized the abundance and diversity of soil microbial communities over 2 years at two-week intervals on three neighboring fields at an operational farm in Northern Germany. Field soils differed in texture (clay, loam) and tillage (soil conservation vs. conventional). PCR-amplicon analyses of soil DNA revealed distinct temporal variations of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists (Cercozoa and Endomyxa). Annual differences and seasonal effects on all microbial groups were detected. In addition to soil pH, prokaryotic communities varied with total soil C and N, but fungi with temperature and precipitation. The C/N ratio had contrasting effects on prokaryotic phyla and protistan classes, but all fungal phyla responded positively. Irrespective of the sampling date, prokaryotic and fungal but not protistan community compositions from the three soils were distinct. Compositional turnover rates were higher for fungi and protists than for prokaryotes and, for all, lower in clay. Conventional tillage had the strongest effect on protist diversity. In co-occurrence networks, most nodes were provided by prokaryotes, but highly connected nodes by predatory protists in the first, and by saprotrophic fungi in the second year. The temporal variation established here can provide insights of what is natural and thus below the limits of concern in detecting adverse effects on the soil microbiome.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725000240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农田的可持续利用应利用其常驻土壤微生物群提供的有益服务。为了确定未来对土壤微生物群潜在的不利环境影响,更好地了解其自然变异性是至关重要的。在这里,我们描述了土壤微生物群落的丰度和多样性,在两年的时间里,每隔两周在德国北部的一个运营农场的三个相邻的田地上。田间土壤在质地(粘土、壤土)和耕作方式(土壤保持与传统)上有所不同。土壤DNA的pcr扩增子分析揭示了细菌、古生菌、真菌和原生生物(尾虫和内生菌)的明显时间变化。检测各微生物群的年差异和季节效应。除土壤pH外,原核生物群落受土壤总碳氮的影响,真菌群落受温度和降水的影响。C/ n比值对原核生物门和原核生物门有不同的影响,但真菌门均有积极响应。无论采样日期如何,三种土壤的原核生物和真菌群落组成不同,而原生生物群落组成不同。真菌和原生生物的成分周转率高于原核生物,而粘土中的成分周转率都较低。常规耕作对原生生物多样性的影响最大。在共生网络中,大部分节点由原核生物提供,但高度连接的节点在第一年由掠食性原生生物提供,第二年由腐养真菌提供。这里建立的时间变化可以提供关于什么是自然的见解,从而在检测对土壤微生物组的不利影响时低于关注的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinct seasonal and annual variability of prokaryotes, fungi and protists in cropland soil under different tillage systems and soil texture
A sustainable use of croplands should utilize beneficial services provided by their resident soil microbiome. To identify potentially adverse environmental effects on soil microbiomes in the future, a better understanding of their natural variability is fundamental. Here, we characterized the abundance and diversity of soil microbial communities over 2 years at two-week intervals on three neighboring fields at an operational farm in Northern Germany. Field soils differed in texture (clay, loam) and tillage (soil conservation vs. conventional). PCR-amplicon analyses of soil DNA revealed distinct temporal variations of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists (Cercozoa and Endomyxa). Annual differences and seasonal effects on all microbial groups were detected. In addition to soil pH, prokaryotic communities varied with total soil C and N, but fungi with temperature and precipitation. The C/N ratio had contrasting effects on prokaryotic phyla and protistan classes, but all fungal phyla responded positively. Irrespective of the sampling date, prokaryotic and fungal but not protistan community compositions from the three soils were distinct. Compositional turnover rates were higher for fungi and protists than for prokaryotes and, for all, lower in clay. Conventional tillage had the strongest effect on protist diversity. In co-occurrence networks, most nodes were provided by prokaryotes, but highly connected nodes by predatory protists in the first, and by saprotrophic fungi in the second year. The temporal variation established here can provide insights of what is natural and thus below the limits of concern in detecting adverse effects on the soil microbiome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Shrub and sedge rhizosphere communities display distinct affinities toward exudates and soil organic matter degradation: a quantitative stable isotope probing analysis Is the temperature-dependence of soil respiration Q10 similar during soil drying and rewetting? A volumetric integral approach to estimate the rhizosphere extent from measured and simulated concentration profiles Interactive effects of litter diversity, functional traits, and macrofauna on decomposition of litter mixtures from lianas and trees Conserved crop root economics space drives niche partitioning of ammonia oxidizers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1