ADHD的情绪处理困难:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析研究。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3
Ana-María Soler-Gutiérrez, Alberto J Sánchez-Carmona, Jacobo Albert, José Antonio Hinojosa, Samuele Cortese, Alessio Bellato, Julia Mayas
{"title":"ADHD的情绪处理困难:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析研究。","authors":"Ana-María Soler-Gutiérrez, Alberto J Sánchez-Carmona, Jacobo Albert, José Antonio Hinojosa, Samuele Cortese, Alessio Bellato, Julia Mayas","doi":"10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated whether there is an emotional processing deficit in ADHD and whether this only applies to specific emotional categories. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review based on a pre-registered protocol ( https://osf.io/egp7d ), we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science databases until 3rd December 2023, to identify empirical studies comparing emotional processing in individuals meeting DSM (version III to 5-TR) or ICD (version 9 or 10) criteria for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and in a non-psychiatric control group. Study quality was assessed with the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Eighty studies were included and meta-analysed (encompassing 6191 participants and 465 observations). Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to compare individuals with ADHD and non-psychiatric controls on overall emotional processing measures (meta-analysis 1) and across emotional categories (meta-analysis 2). The type of stimulus employed, outcome measurement reported, age, sex, and medication status were analysed as moderators. We found poorer performance in both overall emotion processing (g =  - 0.65) and across emotional categories (anger g =  - 0.37; disgust g =  - 0.24; fear g =  - 0.37; sadness g =  - 0.34; surprise g =  - 0.26; happiness/positive g =  - 0.31; negative g =  - 0.20; neutral g =  - 0.25) for individuals with ADHD compared to non-psychiatric controls. Scales items and accuracy outcome being the most effective moderators in detecting such differences. No effects of age, sex, or medication status were found. Overall, these results show that impaired emotional processing is a relevant feature of ADHD and suggest that it should be systematically assessed in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"2369-2390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion processing difficulties in ADHD: a Bayesian meta-analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana-María Soler-Gutiérrez, Alberto J Sánchez-Carmona, Jacobo Albert, José Antonio Hinojosa, Samuele Cortese, Alessio Bellato, Julia Mayas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated whether there is an emotional processing deficit in ADHD and whether this only applies to specific emotional categories. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review based on a pre-registered protocol ( https://osf.io/egp7d ), we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science databases until 3rd December 2023, to identify empirical studies comparing emotional processing in individuals meeting DSM (version III to 5-TR) or ICD (version 9 or 10) criteria for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and in a non-psychiatric control group. Study quality was assessed with the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Eighty studies were included and meta-analysed (encompassing 6191 participants and 465 observations). Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to compare individuals with ADHD and non-psychiatric controls on overall emotional processing measures (meta-analysis 1) and across emotional categories (meta-analysis 2). The type of stimulus employed, outcome measurement reported, age, sex, and medication status were analysed as moderators. We found poorer performance in both overall emotion processing (g =  - 0.65) and across emotional categories (anger g =  - 0.37; disgust g =  - 0.24; fear g =  - 0.37; sadness g =  - 0.34; surprise g =  - 0.26; happiness/positive g =  - 0.31; negative g =  - 0.20; neutral g =  - 0.25) for individuals with ADHD compared to non-psychiatric controls. Scales items and accuracy outcome being the most effective moderators in detecting such differences. No effects of age, sex, or medication status were found. Overall, these results show that impaired emotional processing is a relevant feature of ADHD and suggest that it should be systematically assessed in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2369-2390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02647-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了ADHD患者是否存在情绪处理缺陷,以及这是否仅适用于特定的情绪类别。在这项基于预注册方案(https://osf.io/egp7d)的符合prisma标准的系统评价中,我们检索了MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus和Web of Science数据库,直到2023年12月3日,以确定符合DSM(版本III至5-TR)或ICD(版本9或10)标准的注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)个体和非精神病学对照组的情绪处理的实证研究。采用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)评估研究质量。80项研究被纳入和荟萃分析(包括6191名参与者和465项观察)。进行贝叶斯荟萃分析,比较ADHD患者和非精神病学对照组在整体情绪处理测量(荟萃分析1)和跨情绪类别(荟萃分析2)上的差异。采用的刺激类型、报告的结果测量、年龄、性别和药物状况作为调节因素进行分析。我们发现,在整体情绪处理(g = - 0.65)和跨情绪类别(愤怒g = - 0.37;厌恶度g = - 0.24;恐惧g = - 0.37;悲伤g = - 0.34;惊喜g = - 0.26;幸福/正g = - 0.31;负g = - 0.20;中性g = - 0.25)。量表项目和准确性结果是检测这些差异最有效的调节因子。没有发现年龄、性别或药物状况的影响。总的来说,这些结果表明情绪处理受损是ADHD的一个相关特征,并建议在临床实践中对其进行系统评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotion processing difficulties in ADHD: a Bayesian meta-analysis study.

We investigated whether there is an emotional processing deficit in ADHD and whether this only applies to specific emotional categories. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review based on a pre-registered protocol ( https://osf.io/egp7d ), we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science databases until 3rd December 2023, to identify empirical studies comparing emotional processing in individuals meeting DSM (version III to 5-TR) or ICD (version 9 or 10) criteria for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and in a non-psychiatric control group. Study quality was assessed with the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Eighty studies were included and meta-analysed (encompassing 6191 participants and 465 observations). Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to compare individuals with ADHD and non-psychiatric controls on overall emotional processing measures (meta-analysis 1) and across emotional categories (meta-analysis 2). The type of stimulus employed, outcome measurement reported, age, sex, and medication status were analysed as moderators. We found poorer performance in both overall emotion processing (g =  - 0.65) and across emotional categories (anger g =  - 0.37; disgust g =  - 0.24; fear g =  - 0.37; sadness g =  - 0.34; surprise g =  - 0.26; happiness/positive g =  - 0.31; negative g =  - 0.20; neutral g =  - 0.25) for individuals with ADHD compared to non-psychiatric controls. Scales items and accuracy outcome being the most effective moderators in detecting such differences. No effects of age, sex, or medication status were found. Overall, these results show that impaired emotional processing is a relevant feature of ADHD and suggest that it should be systematically assessed in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.
期刊最新文献
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and pediatric bipolar disorder: diagnostic and prescribing trends following DSM-5. The exponential increase in the number of prescriptions for ADHD medication between 2012 and 2022 in Poland in patients aged 5-59 years: a pharmacoepidemiological study. From overuse to self-control: impact of a psychosocial skills program in preventing internet addiction among Tunisian adolescents. Exploring serum GFAP and UCH-L1 levels in children with global developmental delay: associations with language impairment and widened extracerebral spaces. Contribution of attentional mechanisms to verbal and nonverbal communication in boys with ASD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1