在脓毒症早期诊断中使用单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)需要标准化指南。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.3390/jpm15010005
Andrea Piccioni, Fabio Spagnuolo, Silvia Baroni, Gabriele Savioli, Federico Valletta, Maria Chiara Bungaro, Gianluca Tullo, Marcello Candelli, Antonio Gasbarrini, Francesco Franceschi
{"title":"在脓毒症早期诊断中使用单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)需要标准化指南。","authors":"Andrea Piccioni, Fabio Spagnuolo, Silvia Baroni, Gabriele Savioli, Federico Valletta, Maria Chiara Bungaro, Gianluca Tullo, Marcello Candelli, Antonio Gasbarrini, Francesco Franceschi","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis is a complex and potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by an abnormal immune response to an infection, which can lead to organ dysfunction, septic shock, and death. Early diagnosis is crucial to improving prognosis and reducing hospital management costs. This narrative review aims to summarize and evaluate the current literature on the role of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis, highlighting its advantages, limitations, and potential clinical applications. MDW measures the volumetric distribution width of monocytes, reflecting monocytic anisocytosis, and is detected using advanced hematological analyzers. In 2019, it was approved by the FDA as a biomarker for sepsis due to its ability to identify systemic inflammatory response at an early stage. Thirty-one studies analyzed by us have shown that an increased MDW value is associated with a higher risk of sepsis and that its combination with clinical parameters (such as qSOFA) and other biomarkers (CRP, PCT) can enhance diagnostic sensitivity and risk stratification capacity. Despite its high sensitivity, MDW has lower specificity compared to more established biomarkers such as procalcitonin, thus requiring a multimodal integration for an accurate diagnosis. The use of MDW in emergency and intensive care settings represents an opportunity to improve early sepsis diagnosis and critical patient management, particularly when combined with other markers and clinical tools. However, further studies are needed to define a universal cut-off and confirm its validity in different clinical contexts and pathological scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Need for Standardized Guidelines for the Use of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in the Early Diagnosis of Sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Piccioni, Fabio Spagnuolo, Silvia Baroni, Gabriele Savioli, Federico Valletta, Maria Chiara Bungaro, Gianluca Tullo, Marcello Candelli, Antonio Gasbarrini, Francesco Franceschi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15010005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sepsis is a complex and potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by an abnormal immune response to an infection, which can lead to organ dysfunction, septic shock, and death. Early diagnosis is crucial to improving prognosis and reducing hospital management costs. This narrative review aims to summarize and evaluate the current literature on the role of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis, highlighting its advantages, limitations, and potential clinical applications. MDW measures the volumetric distribution width of monocytes, reflecting monocytic anisocytosis, and is detected using advanced hematological analyzers. In 2019, it was approved by the FDA as a biomarker for sepsis due to its ability to identify systemic inflammatory response at an early stage. Thirty-one studies analyzed by us have shown that an increased MDW value is associated with a higher risk of sepsis and that its combination with clinical parameters (such as qSOFA) and other biomarkers (CRP, PCT) can enhance diagnostic sensitivity and risk stratification capacity. Despite its high sensitivity, MDW has lower specificity compared to more established biomarkers such as procalcitonin, thus requiring a multimodal integration for an accurate diagnosis. The use of MDW in emergency and intensive care settings represents an opportunity to improve early sepsis diagnosis and critical patient management, particularly when combined with other markers and clinical tools. However, further studies are needed to define a universal cut-off and confirm its validity in different clinical contexts and pathological scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症是一种复杂且可能危及生命的综合征,其特征是对感染的免疫反应异常,可导致器官功能障碍、感染性休克和死亡。早期诊断对改善预后和降低医院管理成本至关重要。本文旨在总结和评价目前关于单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)作为脓毒症诊断生物标志物的作用的文献,强调其优势、局限性和潜在的临床应用。MDW测量单核细胞的体积分布宽度,反映单核细胞异数,并使用先进的血液学分析仪进行检测。2019年,由于能够在早期阶段识别全身性炎症反应,它被FDA批准作为败血症的生物标志物。我们分析的31项研究表明,MDW值的升高与脓毒症的高风险相关,并且MDW值与临床参数(如qSOFA)和其他生物标志物(CRP、PCT)的结合可以增强诊断敏感性和风险分层能力。尽管MDW具有高灵敏度,但与降钙素原等更成熟的生物标志物相比,它的特异性较低,因此需要多模式整合才能准确诊断。在急诊和重症监护环境中使用MDW为改善早期败血症诊断和危重患者管理提供了机会,特别是在与其他标志物和临床工具结合使用时。然而,需要进一步的研究来定义一个普遍的截止点,并确认其在不同临床背景和病理情况下的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Need for Standardized Guidelines for the Use of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in the Early Diagnosis of Sepsis.

Sepsis is a complex and potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by an abnormal immune response to an infection, which can lead to organ dysfunction, septic shock, and death. Early diagnosis is crucial to improving prognosis and reducing hospital management costs. This narrative review aims to summarize and evaluate the current literature on the role of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis, highlighting its advantages, limitations, and potential clinical applications. MDW measures the volumetric distribution width of monocytes, reflecting monocytic anisocytosis, and is detected using advanced hematological analyzers. In 2019, it was approved by the FDA as a biomarker for sepsis due to its ability to identify systemic inflammatory response at an early stage. Thirty-one studies analyzed by us have shown that an increased MDW value is associated with a higher risk of sepsis and that its combination with clinical parameters (such as qSOFA) and other biomarkers (CRP, PCT) can enhance diagnostic sensitivity and risk stratification capacity. Despite its high sensitivity, MDW has lower specificity compared to more established biomarkers such as procalcitonin, thus requiring a multimodal integration for an accurate diagnosis. The use of MDW in emergency and intensive care settings represents an opportunity to improve early sepsis diagnosis and critical patient management, particularly when combined with other markers and clinical tools. However, further studies are needed to define a universal cut-off and confirm its validity in different clinical contexts and pathological scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Personalized Risk Stratification of Residual Histologic Activity in IBD Using Circulating Cytokines. Association Between Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Recognition of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Exploratory Bayesian Modeling Analysis. Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Ruling Out Coronary Artery Disease in Elderly Patients Candidates to TAVI. The Relationship Between Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Orthodontic Treatment Need: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1