腹腔镜下B-I重建胃远端切除术中三角吻合与环钉吻合术后内镜表现及体重变化的比较

IF 1.1 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/ases.70023
Shuichiro Oya, Shinichi Sakuramoto, Yosuke Morimoto, Kazuaki Matsui, Keiji Nishibeppu, Gen Ebara, Shohei Fujita, Shiro Fujihata, Seigi Lee, Yutaka Miyawaki, Hirofumi Sugita, Hiroshi Sato, Keishi Yamashita
{"title":"腹腔镜下B-I重建胃远端切除术中三角吻合与环钉吻合术后内镜表现及体重变化的比较","authors":"Shuichiro Oya,&nbsp;Shinichi Sakuramoto,&nbsp;Yosuke Morimoto,&nbsp;Kazuaki Matsui,&nbsp;Keiji Nishibeppu,&nbsp;Gen Ebara,&nbsp;Shohei Fujita,&nbsp;Shiro Fujihata,&nbsp;Seigi Lee,&nbsp;Yutaka Miyawaki,&nbsp;Hirofumi Sugita,&nbsp;Hiroshi Sato,&nbsp;Keishi Yamashita","doi":"10.1111/ases.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with Billroth I (B-I) reconstruction is frequently performed for gastric cancer. However, the difference between the circular stapler technique (CS) and delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) remains unclear, especially regarding the postoperative endoscopic physiological findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred and one patients including 150 CS patients and 151 DA patients during LADG with B-I reconstruction between 2013 and 2019 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were chosen as study subjects. Postoperative endoscopic findings (1-year post-surgery) in the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, and bile-reflux classification, and the first-year postoperative weight changes were also recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The incidences of Grade 2 or higher remnant gastritis, bile reflux, and postoperative exacerbated reflux esophagitis were significantly higher in the DA group, while the amount of residual food was higher in the CS group. Multivariate analysis also revealed the higher risks of Grade 2 or higher gastritis and the postoperative existence or exacerbation of erosive reflux esophagitis in the DA group (OR [95% CI] was 2.737 [1.566–4.783], 3.533 [1.101–11.34], and 3.749 [1.021–13.76], respectively). However, none of these endoscopic differences but the broader extent of gastritis was the only endoscopic factor associated with severe postoperative weight loss.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There was a trend toward more exacerbation of residual gastritis and reflux esophagitis with the DA technique and more food remnants with the CS technique. Although the difference in the anastomotic technique did not directly result in weight loss, attention should be paid to prevent extensive residual gastritis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons in Postoperative Endoscopic Findings and Postoperative Weight Change Between Delta-Shaped Anastomosis and Circular-Stapled Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy With B-I Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Shuichiro Oya,&nbsp;Shinichi Sakuramoto,&nbsp;Yosuke Morimoto,&nbsp;Kazuaki Matsui,&nbsp;Keiji Nishibeppu,&nbsp;Gen Ebara,&nbsp;Shohei Fujita,&nbsp;Shiro Fujihata,&nbsp;Seigi Lee,&nbsp;Yutaka Miyawaki,&nbsp;Hirofumi Sugita,&nbsp;Hiroshi Sato,&nbsp;Keishi Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ases.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with Billroth I (B-I) reconstruction is frequently performed for gastric cancer. However, the difference between the circular stapler technique (CS) and delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) remains unclear, especially regarding the postoperative endoscopic physiological findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three hundred and one patients including 150 CS patients and 151 DA patients during LADG with B-I reconstruction between 2013 and 2019 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were chosen as study subjects. Postoperative endoscopic findings (1-year post-surgery) in the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, and bile-reflux classification, and the first-year postoperative weight changes were also recorded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The incidences of Grade 2 or higher remnant gastritis, bile reflux, and postoperative exacerbated reflux esophagitis were significantly higher in the DA group, while the amount of residual food was higher in the CS group. Multivariate analysis also revealed the higher risks of Grade 2 or higher gastritis and the postoperative existence or exacerbation of erosive reflux esophagitis in the DA group (OR [95% CI] was 2.737 [1.566–4.783], 3.533 [1.101–11.34], and 3.749 [1.021–13.76], respectively). However, none of these endoscopic differences but the broader extent of gastritis was the only endoscopic factor associated with severe postoperative weight loss.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a trend toward more exacerbation of residual gastritis and reflux esophagitis with the DA technique and more food remnants with the CS technique. Although the difference in the anastomotic technique did not directly result in weight loss, attention should be paid to prevent extensive residual gastritis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜辅助下远端胃切除术(LADG)联合Billroth I (B-I)重建是治疗胃癌的常用方法。然而,圆形吻合器技术(CS)和三角形吻合术(DA)之间的区别尚不清楚,特别是在术后内镜生理检查方面。方法:选取2013 - 2019年在埼玉医科大学国际医学中心接受LADG B-I重建的CS患者150例、DA患者151例共301例作为研究对象。根据残胃、胃炎、胆汁反流分类评估残胃术后1年内镜检查结果,并记录残胃术后1年体重变化。结果:DA组2级及以上残余胃炎、胆汁反流、术后加重反流性食管炎发生率明显高于CS组,CS组残余食物量明显高于CS组。多因素分析还显示,DA组发生2级及以上胃炎、术后存在或加重糜烂性反流性食管炎的风险更高(or [95% CI]分别为2.737[1.566-4.783]、3.533[1.101-11.34]、3.749[1.021-13.76])。然而,这些内窥镜差异都没有,但胃炎的更广泛程度是与术后严重体重减轻相关的唯一内窥镜因素。结论:DA技术有加重残余胃炎和反流性食管炎的趋势,CS技术有加重食物残渣的趋势。虽然吻合技术的差异没有直接导致体重减轻,但应注意预防广泛残余胃炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparisons in Postoperative Endoscopic Findings and Postoperative Weight Change Between Delta-Shaped Anastomosis and Circular-Stapled Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy With B-I Reconstruction

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with Billroth I (B-I) reconstruction is frequently performed for gastric cancer. However, the difference between the circular stapler technique (CS) and delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) remains unclear, especially regarding the postoperative endoscopic physiological findings.

Methods

Three hundred and one patients including 150 CS patients and 151 DA patients during LADG with B-I reconstruction between 2013 and 2019 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were chosen as study subjects. Postoperative endoscopic findings (1-year post-surgery) in the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, and bile-reflux classification, and the first-year postoperative weight changes were also recorded.

Results

The incidences of Grade 2 or higher remnant gastritis, bile reflux, and postoperative exacerbated reflux esophagitis were significantly higher in the DA group, while the amount of residual food was higher in the CS group. Multivariate analysis also revealed the higher risks of Grade 2 or higher gastritis and the postoperative existence or exacerbation of erosive reflux esophagitis in the DA group (OR [95% CI] was 2.737 [1.566–4.783], 3.533 [1.101–11.34], and 3.749 [1.021–13.76], respectively). However, none of these endoscopic differences but the broader extent of gastritis was the only endoscopic factor associated with severe postoperative weight loss.

Conclusion

There was a trend toward more exacerbation of residual gastritis and reflux esophagitis with the DA technique and more food remnants with the CS technique. Although the difference in the anastomotic technique did not directly result in weight loss, attention should be paid to prevent extensive residual gastritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
A Case of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer Associated With an Upside-Down Stomach: Sac-First Dissection Before Lymphadenectomy Standardization and Learning Curve of Robotic Left Hepatectomy Employing Glissonean Approach Carbon Footprint in Hepatectomy Increases as the Approach Shifts From Open to Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Surgery Stepwise Colpotomy With Selective Vaginal Septum Trimming During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for High-Reaching Longitudinal Vaginal Septum First Reported Case Using ANSUR for Local Resection of the Stomach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1