急性血管紧张素受体阻断和记忆辨别健康参与者。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.119
Divya Prasad , Lorika Shkreli , Riccardo De Giorgi , Sara Costi , Andrea Reinecke
{"title":"急性血管紧张素受体阻断和记忆辨别健康参与者。","authors":"Divya Prasad ,&nbsp;Lorika Shkreli ,&nbsp;Riccardo De Giorgi ,&nbsp;Sara Costi ,&nbsp;Andrea Reinecke","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is implicated in various cognitive processes relevant to anxiety. However, the role of the RAS in pattern separation, a hippocampal memory mechanism that enables discrete encoding of similar stimuli, is unclear. Given the proposed role of this mechanism in overgeneralization and the maintenance of anxiety, we explored the influence of the RAS on mnemonic discrimination, i.e., the behavioral ability arising from pattern separation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In a double-blind experimental medicine trial, we examined the effect of losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, on mnemonic discrimination in <em>N</em> = 60 healthy volunteers aged 18–50. Participants were randomly allocated to a 50 mg losartan or placebo condition, and then completed the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), an established measure of mnemonic discrimination. Main outcome measures were the lure discrimination index (LDI), calculated as the rate of ‘similar’ responses to lures minus ‘similar’ responses to foils, and recognition (REC) memory, calculated as the difference between the rate of ‘old’ responses to targets minus ‘old’ responses to foils.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data were available for <em>N</em> = 56 participants (<em>N</em> = 40 females, <em>N</em> = 16 males). Participants in the losartan group (<em>N</em> = 29) achieved significantly higher LDI scores (<em>t(54)</em> <em>=</em> <em>2.30, p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.025</em>) compared to the placebo group (<em>N</em> = 27), indicating better mnemonic discrimination. No significant group differences were found in REC scores (<em>U</em> = 324, z = −1.10, <em>d =</em> 0.08; <em>p</em> = 0.271).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrate for the first time that losartan improves mnemonic discrimination in healthy individuals, suggesting that the RAS may influence pattern separation and anxiety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"375 ","pages":"Pages 293-296"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute angiotensin receptor blockade and mnemonic discrimination in healthy participants\",\"authors\":\"Divya Prasad ,&nbsp;Lorika Shkreli ,&nbsp;Riccardo De Giorgi ,&nbsp;Sara Costi ,&nbsp;Andrea Reinecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is implicated in various cognitive processes relevant to anxiety. However, the role of the RAS in pattern separation, a hippocampal memory mechanism that enables discrete encoding of similar stimuli, is unclear. Given the proposed role of this mechanism in overgeneralization and the maintenance of anxiety, we explored the influence of the RAS on mnemonic discrimination, i.e., the behavioral ability arising from pattern separation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In a double-blind experimental medicine trial, we examined the effect of losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, on mnemonic discrimination in <em>N</em> = 60 healthy volunteers aged 18–50. Participants were randomly allocated to a 50 mg losartan or placebo condition, and then completed the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), an established measure of mnemonic discrimination. Main outcome measures were the lure discrimination index (LDI), calculated as the rate of ‘similar’ responses to lures minus ‘similar’ responses to foils, and recognition (REC) memory, calculated as the difference between the rate of ‘old’ responses to targets minus ‘old’ responses to foils.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data were available for <em>N</em> = 56 participants (<em>N</em> = 40 females, <em>N</em> = 16 males). Participants in the losartan group (<em>N</em> = 29) achieved significantly higher LDI scores (<em>t(54)</em> <em>=</em> <em>2.30, p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.025</em>) compared to the placebo group (<em>N</em> = 27), indicating better mnemonic discrimination. No significant group differences were found in REC scores (<em>U</em> = 324, z = −1.10, <em>d =</em> 0.08; <em>p</em> = 0.271).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrate for the first time that losartan improves mnemonic discrimination in healthy individuals, suggesting that the RAS may influence pattern separation and anxiety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\"375 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 293-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725001399\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725001399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾素血管紧张素系统(RAS)参与与焦虑相关的各种认知过程。然而,RAS在模式分离中的作用尚不清楚,模式分离是一种海马记忆机制,可以对类似刺激进行离散编码。鉴于该机制在过度概括和焦虑维持中的作用,我们探讨了RAS对记忆歧视的影响,即模式分离引起的行为能力。设计:在一项双盲实验医学试验中,我们研究了氯沙坦(一种血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)对N = 60名年龄在18-50岁的健康志愿者记忆辨别的影响。参与者被随机分配到50 毫克氯沙坦或安慰剂组,然后完成记忆相似性任务(MST),这是一种既定的模式分离措施。主要结果测量是诱饵辨别指数(LDI),计算为对诱饵的“相似”反应率减去对箔的“相似”反应率;识别(REC)记忆,计算为对目标的“旧”反应率减去对箔的“旧”反应率之间的差。结果:N = 56名参与者(N = 40名女性,N = 16名男性)获得资料。与安慰剂组(N = 27)相比,氯沙坦组(N = 29)的参与者获得了显著更高的LDI评分(t(54) = 2.30,p = 0.025),表明更好的助记辨别能力。REC评分组间差异无统计学意义(U = 324,z = -1.10,d = 0.08; = 0.271页)。结论:我们首次证明氯沙坦可以改善健康个体的记忆区分,提示RAS可能影响模式分离和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute angiotensin receptor blockade and mnemonic discrimination in healthy participants

Background

The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is implicated in various cognitive processes relevant to anxiety. However, the role of the RAS in pattern separation, a hippocampal memory mechanism that enables discrete encoding of similar stimuli, is unclear. Given the proposed role of this mechanism in overgeneralization and the maintenance of anxiety, we explored the influence of the RAS on mnemonic discrimination, i.e., the behavioral ability arising from pattern separation.

Design

In a double-blind experimental medicine trial, we examined the effect of losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, on mnemonic discrimination in N = 60 healthy volunteers aged 18–50. Participants were randomly allocated to a 50 mg losartan or placebo condition, and then completed the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), an established measure of mnemonic discrimination. Main outcome measures were the lure discrimination index (LDI), calculated as the rate of ‘similar’ responses to lures minus ‘similar’ responses to foils, and recognition (REC) memory, calculated as the difference between the rate of ‘old’ responses to targets minus ‘old’ responses to foils.

Results

Data were available for N = 56 participants (N = 40 females, N = 16 males). Participants in the losartan group (N = 29) achieved significantly higher LDI scores (t(54) = 2.30, p = 0.025) compared to the placebo group (N = 27), indicating better mnemonic discrimination. No significant group differences were found in REC scores (U = 324, z = −1.10, d = 0.08; p = 0.271).

Conclusions

We demonstrate for the first time that losartan improves mnemonic discrimination in healthy individuals, suggesting that the RAS may influence pattern separation and anxiety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiota from adolescents with social anxiety disorder is associated with behavioral alterations and metabolic changes in the medial prefrontal cortex Dimensional and categorical approaches to behavioral-emotional problems in children and adolescents with mental disorders: A cross-sectional study Cost-effectiveness of integrated prevention for late-life depressive symptoms: Real-world findings from a large-scale pragmatic trial (“JoyAge”) Effect of continuation treatment on health-related quality of life in remitted psychotic depression Neural alterations in viral pneumonia patients comorbid with insomnia in a Chinese population: Insight from surface-based morphometry analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1