儿科重症监护提供者对儿童医疗复杂性和神经功能障碍的态度:一项定性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Children-Basel Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.3390/children12010034
Elizabeth J Bleed, Leonardo Barrera, Mickayla Jones, Seema K Shah, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Carolyn C Foster
{"title":"儿科重症监护提供者对儿童医疗复杂性和神经功能障碍的态度:一项定性研究。","authors":"Elizabeth J Bleed, Leonardo Barrera, Mickayla Jones, Seema K Shah, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Carolyn C Foster","doi":"10.3390/children12010034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) and neurologic impairment (NI) are a growing population in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). (2) Objective: Our aim was to explore and describe the experiences and beliefs of PICU providers caring for CMC with NI. (3) Methods: A qualitative interview-based study was conducted. Participants were 20 providers (12 attendings and 8 nurse practitioners) who met inclusion criteria of being a faculty, fellow, or advanced practice provider who worked in a PICU; residents were excluded. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling until information power was reached, and came from seven PICUs across six states, with 10 participants from the authors' home institution and 10 from external PICUs. Data were collected via recorded videoconference interviews, which were transcribed. Analysis was conducted and relevant themes were identified using the analytic technique of thematic analysis. Rigor was assured by using two coders. (4) Results: Four main themes were identified: (i) providers view CMC with NI as a distinct population of growing importance; (ii) CMC with NI have care needs that challenge traditional perceptions of PICU practice; (iii) PICU providers expressed ambivalence towards caring for CMC with NI; and (iv) some PICU providers have developed adaptive strategies. (5) Conclusions: This population challenges the typical notion of what pediatric critical care represents. Providers display ambivalence about caring for these patients but can develop strategies to make this work meaningful. Understanding PICU clinicians' views about CMC with NI can provide insights for improved patient care and reduced provider burnout as the field adapts to this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Intensive Care Provider Attitudes About Children with Medical Complexity and Neurologic Impairment: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J Bleed, Leonardo Barrera, Mickayla Jones, Seema K Shah, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Carolyn C Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12010034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) and neurologic impairment (NI) are a growing population in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). (2) Objective: Our aim was to explore and describe the experiences and beliefs of PICU providers caring for CMC with NI. (3) Methods: A qualitative interview-based study was conducted. Participants were 20 providers (12 attendings and 8 nurse practitioners) who met inclusion criteria of being a faculty, fellow, or advanced practice provider who worked in a PICU; residents were excluded. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling until information power was reached, and came from seven PICUs across six states, with 10 participants from the authors' home institution and 10 from external PICUs. Data were collected via recorded videoconference interviews, which were transcribed. Analysis was conducted and relevant themes were identified using the analytic technique of thematic analysis. Rigor was assured by using two coders. (4) Results: Four main themes were identified: (i) providers view CMC with NI as a distinct population of growing importance; (ii) CMC with NI have care needs that challenge traditional perceptions of PICU practice; (iii) PICU providers expressed ambivalence towards caring for CMC with NI; and (iv) some PICU providers have developed adaptive strategies. (5) Conclusions: This population challenges the typical notion of what pediatric critical care represents. Providers display ambivalence about caring for these patients but can develop strategies to make this work meaningful. Understanding PICU clinicians' views about CMC with NI can provide insights for improved patient care and reduced provider burnout as the field adapts to this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(1)背景:患有医学复杂性(CMC)和神经功能障碍(NI)的儿童是儿科重症监护病房(picu)中越来越多的人群。(2)目的:我们的目的是探讨和描述PICU提供者照顾患有NI的CMC的经验和信念。(3)方法:采用定性访谈法进行研究。参与者是20名提供者(12名主治医生和8名执业护士),他们符合在PICU工作的教员、研究员或高级执业提供者的纳入标准;居民被排除在外。参与者通过有目的和滚雪球抽样的方式招募,直到获得足够的信息。参与者来自6个州的7个picu,其中10名参与者来自作者所在机构,10名来自外部picu。数据是通过录像会议采访收集的,并进行了转录。运用主题分析的分析技术进行分析并确定相关主题。使用两个编码员保证了严谨性。(4)结果:确定了四个主要主题:(i)供应商将具有NI的CMC视为日益重要的独特人群;(ii)患有NI的CMC有挑战PICU传统观念的护理需求;(iii) PICU提供者对NI治疗CMC表现出矛盾的态度;(iv)一些PICU供应商已经制定了适应性策略。(5)结论:这一人群挑战了儿科重症监护所代表的典型概念。提供者对照顾这些病人表现出矛盾心理,但可以制定策略使这项工作有意义。了解PICU临床医生对CMC与NI的看法可以为改善患者护理和减少提供者倦怠提供见解,因为该领域适应了这一人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatric Intensive Care Provider Attitudes About Children with Medical Complexity and Neurologic Impairment: A Qualitative Study.

(1) Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) and neurologic impairment (NI) are a growing population in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). (2) Objective: Our aim was to explore and describe the experiences and beliefs of PICU providers caring for CMC with NI. (3) Methods: A qualitative interview-based study was conducted. Participants were 20 providers (12 attendings and 8 nurse practitioners) who met inclusion criteria of being a faculty, fellow, or advanced practice provider who worked in a PICU; residents were excluded. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling until information power was reached, and came from seven PICUs across six states, with 10 participants from the authors' home institution and 10 from external PICUs. Data were collected via recorded videoconference interviews, which were transcribed. Analysis was conducted and relevant themes were identified using the analytic technique of thematic analysis. Rigor was assured by using two coders. (4) Results: Four main themes were identified: (i) providers view CMC with NI as a distinct population of growing importance; (ii) CMC with NI have care needs that challenge traditional perceptions of PICU practice; (iii) PICU providers expressed ambivalence towards caring for CMC with NI; and (iv) some PICU providers have developed adaptive strategies. (5) Conclusions: This population challenges the typical notion of what pediatric critical care represents. Providers display ambivalence about caring for these patients but can develop strategies to make this work meaningful. Understanding PICU clinicians' views about CMC with NI can provide insights for improved patient care and reduced provider burnout as the field adapts to this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
期刊最新文献
"What's in It for the Kid?": An Approach for the Bedside Ethicist. Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Japanese Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Comparison of Conventional and Age-Adjusted Criteria. Prevalence, Severity and Treatment Needs of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization Among a Cohort of Lebanese Children: A Cross-Sectional Study. Congenital Esophageal Stenosis Presenting During Weaning in a 5-Month-Old Infant. An Integrated Care Pathway for Pediatric Oral Health: Baseline Multicenter Analysis of Dental Caries, Malocclusions, and Oral Hygiene in Three Italian Regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1