Alexandre Delgado , Andrea Lemos , Geyson Marinho , Renato S. Melo , Filipe Pinheiro , Melania Amorim
{"title":"物理治疗辅助分娩:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alexandre Delgado , Andrea Lemos , Geyson Marinho , Renato S. Melo , Filipe Pinheiro , Melania Amorim","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms \"Physical therapy assistance\" and \"Labor\" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 2%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 4546.40; <em>p</em> = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: – 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 53%; T<sup>2</sup>, 45.01; <em>p</em> = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 100%; T<sup>2</sup>, 1.90; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 5.99; <em>p</em> = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 2","pages":"Article 101169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Delgado , Andrea Lemos , Geyson Marinho , Renato S. Melo , Filipe Pinheiro , Melania Amorim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms \\\"Physical therapy assistance\\\" and \\\"Labor\\\" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 2%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 4546.40; <em>p</em> = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: – 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 53%; T<sup>2</sup>, 45.01; <em>p</em> = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 100%; T<sup>2</sup>, 1.90; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; T<sup>2</sup>, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I<sup>2</sup>, 88%; T<sup>2</sup>, 5.99; <em>p</em> = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005781\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:分娩期间的物理治疗辅助可以为准妈妈提供身体和情感上的支持。通过特定的技术,物理治疗师可以帮助减轻疼痛,提高活动能力,并促进更安全,更舒适的分娩。目的:对文献进行系统回顾,以评估分娩过程中物理治疗辅助的潜在益处和风险。方法:在MEDLINE/PubMed、LILACS、PEDro、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、Web of Science和SCOPUS数据库中进行检索,无日期和语言限制。使用术语“物理治疗协助”和“劳动”。随机和准随机临床试验比较了在分娩过程中接受物理治疗辅助的组与接受标准护理的对照组。使用Cochrane工具(RoB 2.0)评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE系统评估证据的确定性。通过meta分析进行定量分析。结果:纳入12项研究,涉及984名孕妇。阴道分娩的频率增加(RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17;9的研究;I2, 2%;T2, 0.00;p = 0.42)和剖宫产的减少(RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76;9的研究;I2, 0%;T2, 0.00;P = 0.65),研究结果基于高确定性证据。第一产程持续时间(MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66;7研究;I2, 88%;T2, 4546.40;p = 0.00001),第二阶段持续时间(MD: - 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64;6研究;I2, 53%;T2, 45.01;p = 0.06)和会阴撕裂的频率(RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96;4研究;I2, 0%;T2, 0.00;P = 0.70),研究结果基于中等确定性证据。在视觉模拟量表上,疼痛也减少了1.46点(MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41;7研究;I2, 100%;T2, 1.90;p < 0.00001),基于低确定性证据的发现,镇痛药使用减少(RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99;2研究;I2, 0%;T2, 0.00;p = 0.44),母亲焦虑在状态-特质焦虑量表上降低了7.65点(MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03;2研究;I2, 88%;T2, 5.99;P = 0.005)。其他母婴结局没有差异。结论:分娩期间的物理治疗辅助为母亲提供了许多好处。
Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Physical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.
Objective
To perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.
Methods
A search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms "Physical therapy assistance" and "Labor" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.
Results
Twelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I2, 2%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.42) and a reduction in cesarean sections (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.76; 9 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.65) for the physical therapy group, findings based on high-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD: -99.01 min, 95% CI -153.35, -44.66; 7 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 4546.40; p = 0.00001), duration of the second stage (MD: – 11.29 min, 95% CI -18.94, -3.64; 6 studies; I2, 53%; T2, 45.01; p = 0.06) and frequence of perineal lacerations (RR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96; 4 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.70) for the intervention group, findings based on moderate-certainty evidence. There was also a reduction in pain by 1.46 points on the Visual Analog Scale (MD: -1.46, 95% CI -2.52, -0.41; 7 studies; I2, 100%; T2, 1.90; p < 0.00001), findings based on low-certainty evidence, a decrease in analgesic use (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83, 0.99; 2 studies; I2, 0%; T2, 0.00; p = 0.44), and maternal anxiety by 7.65 points on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (MD: -7.65, 95% CI -11.27, -4.03; 2 studies; I2, 88%; T2, 5.99; p = 0.005) for the intervention group. There was no difference in the other maternal and fetal outcomes.
Conclusion
Physical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.