从美国到台湾家庭医学里程碑项目的重要性与适宜性。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6
Shih-Ming Li, Yaw-Wen Chang, Ming-Nan Lin, Chi-Wei Lin, Chyi-Her Lin, Cheng-Chieh Li, Ming-Hwai Lin, Yin-Fan Chang, Zih-Jie Sun, Fang-Yih Liaw, Jaw-Shiun Tsai, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Li-Kuang Chen, Jin-Shang Wu
{"title":"从美国到台湾家庭医学里程碑项目的重要性与适宜性。","authors":"Shih-Ming Li, Yaw-Wen Chang, Ming-Nan Lin, Chi-Wei Lin, Chyi-Her Lin, Cheng-Chieh Li, Ming-Hwai Lin, Yin-Fan Chang, Zih-Jie Sun, Fang-Yih Liaw, Jaw-Shiun Tsai, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Li-Kuang Chen, Jin-Shang Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The six core competencies of ACGME - patient care (PC), medical knowledge (MK), systems-based practice (SBP), practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), professionalism (PROF), and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) - represent domains in which physicians must ultimately demonstrate competence. Although the ACGME's six core competencies have been applied in Taiwan with the milestone project, the application of the six core competences in the Family Medicine milestones for residency training have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 61 family medicine physicians from 25 hospitals from four major geographic areas for a Delphi round one survey and 72 physicians from 27 hospitals for a Delphi round two survey. With 5-point scales, the Cronbach's alphas for both importance and fitness were 0.98 in round one. In round two, the Cronbach's alphas were 0.86 and 0.83 for importance and fitness. The mode and quartile deviation in Delphi method, importance-performance analysis (IPA), and importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) were used for three stages IPA process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In IPA, a total of 72.7% (16/22) of the sub-competencies exhibited high importance and fitness, with a mean score ≥ 4.7; the exceptions were PC-1 (cares for acutely ill or injured patients), MK-2 (critical thinking skills in patient care), SBP-1 (cost-conscious medical care), PBLI-3 (improves systems), PROF-3 (humanism/cultural proficiency), and ICS-4 (utilizes technology). In IPMA, the performance value of six core competencies for FMM-Taiwan was 92.6 when considering the importance and fitness indices of the 22 sub-competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accordance of the ACGME's milestones to Taiwan was acceptable to good and related milestones could been developed for residency training.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance and fitness of family medicine milestone project from America to Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Ming Li, Yaw-Wen Chang, Ming-Nan Lin, Chi-Wei Lin, Chyi-Her Lin, Cheng-Chieh Li, Ming-Hwai Lin, Yin-Fan Chang, Zih-Jie Sun, Fang-Yih Liaw, Jaw-Shiun Tsai, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Li-Kuang Chen, Jin-Shang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The six core competencies of ACGME - patient care (PC), medical knowledge (MK), systems-based practice (SBP), practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), professionalism (PROF), and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) - represent domains in which physicians must ultimately demonstrate competence. Although the ACGME's six core competencies have been applied in Taiwan with the milestone project, the application of the six core competences in the Family Medicine milestones for residency training have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 61 family medicine physicians from 25 hospitals from four major geographic areas for a Delphi round one survey and 72 physicians from 27 hospitals for a Delphi round two survey. With 5-point scales, the Cronbach's alphas for both importance and fitness were 0.98 in round one. In round two, the Cronbach's alphas were 0.86 and 0.83 for importance and fitness. The mode and quartile deviation in Delphi method, importance-performance analysis (IPA), and importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) were used for three stages IPA process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In IPA, a total of 72.7% (16/22) of the sub-competencies exhibited high importance and fitness, with a mean score ≥ 4.7; the exceptions were PC-1 (cares for acutely ill or injured patients), MK-2 (critical thinking skills in patient care), SBP-1 (cost-conscious medical care), PBLI-3 (improves systems), PROF-3 (humanism/cultural proficiency), and ICS-4 (utilizes technology). In IPMA, the performance value of six core competencies for FMM-Taiwan was 92.6 when considering the importance and fitness indices of the 22 sub-competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accordance of the ACGME's milestones to Taiwan was acceptable to good and related milestones could been developed for residency training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ACGME的六个核心能力——病人护理(PC)、医学知识(MK)、系统实践(SBP)、实践学习和改进(PBLI)、专业精神(PROF)以及人际和沟通技巧(ICS)——代表了医生最终必须展示能力的领域。虽然ACGME的六个核心能力已在台湾的里程碑项目中应用,但六个核心能力在家庭医学里程碑中的应用尚未建立住院医师培训。方法:我们从四个主要地理区域的25家医院招募61名家庭医学医生进行第一轮德尔菲调查,从27家医院招募72名医生进行第二轮德尔菲调查。在5分制量表中,第一轮的重要性和适应度的Cronbach's alpha均为0.98。在第二轮测试中,重要性和适应性的Cronbach alpha值分别为0.86和0.83。采用德尔菲法、重要性-绩效分析(IPA)和重要性-绩效矩阵分析(IPMA)的模式和四分位数偏差对IPA过程进行了三个阶段的分析。结果:在IPA中,共有72.7%(16/22)的子胜任力表现为高重要性和高适应度,平均得分≥4.7;例外情况是PC-1(重症或受伤患者护理)、MK-2(患者护理中的批判性思维技能)、SBP-1(成本意识医疗护理)、pbi -3(改善系统)、pro -3(人文主义/文化熟练程度)和ICS-4(利用技术)。在IPMA中,考虑22个子胜任力的重要性指数和适应度指数,fmm -台湾6个核心胜任力的绩效值为92.6。结论:台湾医师医师培训与ACGME目标的一致性较好,可制定相关目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Importance and fitness of family medicine milestone project from America to Taiwan.

Background: The six core competencies of ACGME - patient care (PC), medical knowledge (MK), systems-based practice (SBP), practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), professionalism (PROF), and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) - represent domains in which physicians must ultimately demonstrate competence. Although the ACGME's six core competencies have been applied in Taiwan with the milestone project, the application of the six core competences in the Family Medicine milestones for residency training have not yet been established.

Methods: We recruited 61 family medicine physicians from 25 hospitals from four major geographic areas for a Delphi round one survey and 72 physicians from 27 hospitals for a Delphi round two survey. With 5-point scales, the Cronbach's alphas for both importance and fitness were 0.98 in round one. In round two, the Cronbach's alphas were 0.86 and 0.83 for importance and fitness. The mode and quartile deviation in Delphi method, importance-performance analysis (IPA), and importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) were used for three stages IPA process.

Results: In IPA, a total of 72.7% (16/22) of the sub-competencies exhibited high importance and fitness, with a mean score ≥ 4.7; the exceptions were PC-1 (cares for acutely ill or injured patients), MK-2 (critical thinking skills in patient care), SBP-1 (cost-conscious medical care), PBLI-3 (improves systems), PROF-3 (humanism/cultural proficiency), and ICS-4 (utilizes technology). In IPMA, the performance value of six core competencies for FMM-Taiwan was 92.6 when considering the importance and fitness indices of the 22 sub-competencies.

Conclusions: The accordance of the ACGME's milestones to Taiwan was acceptable to good and related milestones could been developed for residency training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
The impact of a diversified training framework on work-related stress and depressive and anxious emotions among newly hired nurses after training. Artificial intelligence and clinical informatics in UK ophthalmology training: a national cross-sectional survey. Ethical engagement with artificial intelligence in faculty research education: evaluation of the New Knowledge Help (NKH) approach. Factors influencing pharmacy program choice and career attitudes among Tanzanian tertiary students. Quality of adverse drug reaction reports submitted to the national pharmacovigilance center of Nepal: a pre- and post-training evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1