牙科学生道德能力:一项解释性混合方法研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06636-7
Raheleh Mosavi, Fatemeh Foroughipour, Maryam Kazemipoor, Fatemeh Keshmiri
{"title":"牙科学生道德能力:一项解释性混合方法研究。","authors":"Raheleh Mosavi, Fatemeh Foroughipour, Maryam Kazemipoor, Fatemeh Keshmiri","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06636-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the level of four components of moral skills, including moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral courage, among dental students and explore the factors affecting their engagement in moral behavior.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is an explanatory mixed-method study conducted in two quantitative and qualitative phases. Participants included undergraduate students in clerkship courses in Dentistry schools (n = 180). In the quantitative phase, the moral skills of students were assessed by a 40-question Moral Skill Inventory. The data were summarized using mean, standard deviation, and frequency (percentage), one sample t-test, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The students' experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews in the qualitative phase. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach, which Graneheim and Lundman introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of students was reported 43.61 (6.25). The highest scores were reported in the domain of moral reasoning, and the lowest scores were reported in the domain of moral motivation. The participants' experiences were explained in the theme \"morality as a neglected element in dentistry.\" This theme includes two categories: \"Disregarding professionalism as a professional responsibility\" and \"unsupportive behaviors of clinical teachers in a moral dilemma.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed a gap between the current and desirable status of dental students' moral skills. Both individual challenges (e.g., prioritizing personal interests) and systemic issues (e.g., lack of constructive feedback and negative role modeling by clinical teachers) were identified as significant barriers to moral behavior. Therefore, the development of students' moral skills requires planning for personal and system factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral competence of dental students: an explanatory mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Raheleh Mosavi, Fatemeh Foroughipour, Maryam Kazemipoor, Fatemeh Keshmiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-06636-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the level of four components of moral skills, including moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral courage, among dental students and explore the factors affecting their engagement in moral behavior.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is an explanatory mixed-method study conducted in two quantitative and qualitative phases. Participants included undergraduate students in clerkship courses in Dentistry schools (n = 180). In the quantitative phase, the moral skills of students were assessed by a 40-question Moral Skill Inventory. The data were summarized using mean, standard deviation, and frequency (percentage), one sample t-test, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The students' experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews in the qualitative phase. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach, which Graneheim and Lundman introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of students was reported 43.61 (6.25). The highest scores were reported in the domain of moral reasoning, and the lowest scores were reported in the domain of moral motivation. The participants' experiences were explained in the theme \\\"morality as a neglected element in dentistry.\\\" This theme includes two categories: \\\"Disregarding professionalism as a professional responsibility\\\" and \\\"unsupportive behaviors of clinical teachers in a moral dilemma.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed a gap between the current and desirable status of dental students' moral skills. Both individual challenges (e.g., prioritizing personal interests) and systemic issues (e.g., lack of constructive feedback and negative role modeling by clinical teachers) were identified as significant barriers to moral behavior. Therefore, the development of students' moral skills requires planning for personal and system factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06636-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06636-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查牙科学生道德技能的四个组成部分,即道德敏感性、道德推理、道德动机和道德勇气的水平,并探讨影响其道德行为参与的因素。方法:采用解释性混合方法进行定量和定性两个阶段的研究。参与者包括牙科学校见习课程的本科生(n = 180)。在定量阶段,学生的道德技能通过40个问题的道德技能量表进行评估。采用均值、标准差、频率(百分比)、单样本t检验、独立t检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行汇总。在定性阶段,通过半结构化访谈来探讨学生的经历。使用Graneheim和Lundman介绍的传统内容分析方法分析数据。结果:学生平均成绩为43.61分(6.25分)。在道德推理领域得分最高,在道德动机领域得分最低。参与者的经历在“道德作为牙科中被忽视的因素”的主题中得到了解释。这一主题包括“忽视专业作为职业责任”和“临床教师在道德困境中的不支持行为”两大类。结论:牙科学生道德技能的现状与预期存在一定差距。个体挑战(例如,优先考虑个人利益)和系统问题(例如,缺乏建设性反馈和临床教师的消极角色榜样)被认为是道德行为的重大障碍。因此,学生道德技能的培养需要统筹考虑个人因素和制度因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral competence of dental students: an explanatory mixed-methods study.

Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the level of four components of moral skills, including moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral courage, among dental students and explore the factors affecting their engagement in moral behavior.

Method: This is an explanatory mixed-method study conducted in two quantitative and qualitative phases. Participants included undergraduate students in clerkship courses in Dentistry schools (n = 180). In the quantitative phase, the moral skills of students were assessed by a 40-question Moral Skill Inventory. The data were summarized using mean, standard deviation, and frequency (percentage), one sample t-test, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The students' experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews in the qualitative phase. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach, which Graneheim and Lundman introduced.

Results: The mean score of students was reported 43.61 (6.25). The highest scores were reported in the domain of moral reasoning, and the lowest scores were reported in the domain of moral motivation. The participants' experiences were explained in the theme "morality as a neglected element in dentistry." This theme includes two categories: "Disregarding professionalism as a professional responsibility" and "unsupportive behaviors of clinical teachers in a moral dilemma."

Conclusion: The results showed a gap between the current and desirable status of dental students' moral skills. Both individual challenges (e.g., prioritizing personal interests) and systemic issues (e.g., lack of constructive feedback and negative role modeling by clinical teachers) were identified as significant barriers to moral behavior. Therefore, the development of students' moral skills requires planning for personal and system factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
From classroom to the counter: exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward Down syndrome among pharmacy students and pharmacists. From operating room to leadership room: a systematic review of simulation-based interventions for leadership development in general surgery. Debriefing in practice: a cross-sectional observational study of self-reflection competence, psychological safety and speak-up in paramedic training. Effectiveness of a novel pork belly simulation model versus traditional training for ultrasound-guided TAP block in anesthesiology residents. Evaluating a specialty-specific objective structured clinical examination and workplace-based assessment curriculum for radiation oncology postgraduate training: a prospective educational intervention study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1