IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123671
Stefan T Prvulovic, Joanna M Roy, Akshay Warrier, Pemla Jagtiani, Joe Hirsch, Michael M Covell, Christian A Bowers
{"title":"Frailty Predicts Failure to Rescue following Malignant Brain Tumor Resection: A NSQIP Analysis of 14,721 Patients (2012- 2020).","authors":"Stefan T Prvulovic, Joanna M Roy, Akshay Warrier, Pemla Jagtiani, Joe Hirsch, Michael M Covell, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as mortality within 30 days following a major complication. While FTR has been studied in various brain tumor resections, its predictors in malignant brain tumor resection (mBTR) remain unexplored. This study aims to identify FTR predictors in mBTR resection patients using a frailty-driven model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing craniotomy for mBTR were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2012- 2020), with frailty measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 14,721 mBTR patients, 1,275 (8.66%) developed major postoperative complications, and 166 (13.01%) experienced FTR. The cohort's median age was 59, interquartile range (47-68). Multivariate analysis revealed non-elective surgery (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.02-2.16, p<.05) as an independent risk factor for FTR. Frailty was a significant independent predictor of FTR with mBTR, with both frail (N=110) and very frail (N=22) patients having a 5.34-fold and 8.10-fold higher odds of FTR, respectively (p<.001). Expectedly, major postoperative complications were predictive of FTR, including unplanned intubation (OR: 2.56, CI: 1.66-3.95, p<.001), prolonged ventilation (OR: 2.00, CI: 1.37-3.14, p<.01), cardiac arrest (OR: 16.64, CI: 8.20-33.74, p<.001), and septic shock (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.10-3.91, p<.05). The RAI-driven frailty model demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy for predicting FTR patients undergoing mBTR (c-statistic: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative RAI-measured frailty, alongside non-elective surgery and major postoperative complications were significant predictors of FTR in mBTR patients. Identifying mBTR patients at risk for FTR using frailty strata may aid in preoperative neurosurgical risk stratification to optimize patients prior to surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抢救失败(FTR)是指发生主要并发症后 30 天内的死亡率。虽然 FTR 已在各种脑肿瘤切除术中得到研究,但其在恶性脑肿瘤切除术(mBTR)中的预测因素仍未得到探讨。本研究旨在使用虚弱驱动模型确定恶性脑肿瘤切除术患者的 FTR 预测因素:方法:从美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库(2012-2020年)中确定了因mBTR而接受开颅手术的患者,并用风险分析指数(RAI)对患者的虚弱程度进行了测量:在 14,721 名 mBTR 患者中,1,275 人(8.66%)出现主要术后并发症,166 人(13.01%)出现 FTR。组群的中位年龄为 59 岁,四分位数间距(47-68)。多变量分析显示,非选择性手术(OR:1.48,95% CI:1.02-2.16,p 结论:术前 RAI 测量的虚弱程度、非选择性手术和主要术后并发症是 mBTR 患者 FTR 的重要预测因素。利用虚弱分层来识别有FTR风险的mBTR患者,有助于术前神经外科风险分层,从而在术前对患者进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frailty Predicts Failure to Rescue following Malignant Brain Tumor Resection: A NSQIP Analysis of 14,721 Patients (2012- 2020).

Purpose: Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as mortality within 30 days following a major complication. While FTR has been studied in various brain tumor resections, its predictors in malignant brain tumor resection (mBTR) remain unexplored. This study aims to identify FTR predictors in mBTR resection patients using a frailty-driven model.

Methods: Patients undergoing craniotomy for mBTR were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2012- 2020), with frailty measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI).

Results: Of 14,721 mBTR patients, 1,275 (8.66%) developed major postoperative complications, and 166 (13.01%) experienced FTR. The cohort's median age was 59, interquartile range (47-68). Multivariate analysis revealed non-elective surgery (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.02-2.16, p<.05) as an independent risk factor for FTR. Frailty was a significant independent predictor of FTR with mBTR, with both frail (N=110) and very frail (N=22) patients having a 5.34-fold and 8.10-fold higher odds of FTR, respectively (p<.001). Expectedly, major postoperative complications were predictive of FTR, including unplanned intubation (OR: 2.56, CI: 1.66-3.95, p<.001), prolonged ventilation (OR: 2.00, CI: 1.37-3.14, p<.01), cardiac arrest (OR: 16.64, CI: 8.20-33.74, p<.001), and septic shock (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.10-3.91, p<.05). The RAI-driven frailty model demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy for predicting FTR patients undergoing mBTR (c-statistic: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.85).

Conclusion: Preoperative RAI-measured frailty, alongside non-elective surgery and major postoperative complications were significant predictors of FTR in mBTR patients. Identifying mBTR patients at risk for FTR using frailty strata may aid in preoperative neurosurgical risk stratification to optimize patients prior to surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Hemorrhagic Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation: Microelectrode Recording versus Macrostimulation-Does the Technique Matter? Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Model for Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Interventional Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms. Reduced Vertebral Hounsfield Unit Values in the Bridging Group of Ossification-Related Segments in Patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine. The Role of Neuropsychology in the Management of Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Literature Review. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Intersection of Care: Navigating Patient-Hospital Relationships in Neurosurgery".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1