被捕的青少年都有在集体家庭中被寄养的经历。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107245
John Prindle , Andrea Lane Eastman , Wan-Ting Chen , Jacquelyn McCroskey , Emily Putnam-Hornstein
{"title":"被捕的青少年都有在集体家庭中被寄养的经历。","authors":"John Prindle ,&nbsp;Andrea Lane Eastman ,&nbsp;Wan-Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn McCroskey ,&nbsp;Emily Putnam-Hornstein","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 5 % of children and adolescents in foster care are placed in group home settings, with adolescents making up the largest age group in these placements. Group home placement is designed to support individuals with high acuity or specialized needs that cannot be met in a family-based setting. Prior research has highlighted the vulnerabilities of adolescents in group homes, including behavioral issues, mental health concerns, and juvenile justice system involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The current study investigated the relationship between placement status and arrest rates among adolescents experiencing a group home placement.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Child protection system records from California were used to identify adolescents (aged 13–17) who were placed in group homes in 2014 (<em>n</em> = 2437). These records were linked to California Department of Justice arrest records for 2014 and 2015.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Descriptive differences in arrest status were examined by demographics and placement status after initial group home placements with <em>t</em>-tests and logistic regression. The association between placement setting and likelihood of arrest was examined with survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our population of adolescents who experienced a group home placement, 16.7 % were arrested during the study window. Adjusted hazard ratios for arrest were higher when adolescents lived in group homes (aHR = 1.57, <em>p</em> = .029) or ran away from care (aHR = 5.62, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), compared to periods in which adolescents had transitioned to reunification or guardianship. During periods where adolescents were in family foster care settings, arrest rates were comparable to those who had exited to reunification or guardianship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Periods when an adolescent was in a group home setting were associated with a heightened rate of arrest compared to those reunified with their families. We also found that arrests commonly occurred and reoccurred for young people residing in group homes, underscoring the need to understand whether specific protocols and practices in these facilities contribute to increased arrests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arrests among adolescents with a history of foster care placements in group home settings\",\"authors\":\"John Prindle ,&nbsp;Andrea Lane Eastman ,&nbsp;Wan-Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn McCroskey ,&nbsp;Emily Putnam-Hornstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 5 % of children and adolescents in foster care are placed in group home settings, with adolescents making up the largest age group in these placements. Group home placement is designed to support individuals with high acuity or specialized needs that cannot be met in a family-based setting. Prior research has highlighted the vulnerabilities of adolescents in group homes, including behavioral issues, mental health concerns, and juvenile justice system involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The current study investigated the relationship between placement status and arrest rates among adolescents experiencing a group home placement.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Child protection system records from California were used to identify adolescents (aged 13–17) who were placed in group homes in 2014 (<em>n</em> = 2437). These records were linked to California Department of Justice arrest records for 2014 and 2015.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Descriptive differences in arrest status were examined by demographics and placement status after initial group home placements with <em>t</em>-tests and logistic regression. The association between placement setting and likelihood of arrest was examined with survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our population of adolescents who experienced a group home placement, 16.7 % were arrested during the study window. Adjusted hazard ratios for arrest were higher when adolescents lived in group homes (aHR = 1.57, <em>p</em> = .029) or ran away from care (aHR = 5.62, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), compared to periods in which adolescents had transitioned to reunification or guardianship. During periods where adolescents were in family foster care settings, arrest rates were comparable to those who had exited to reunification or guardianship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Periods when an adolescent was in a group home setting were associated with a heightened rate of arrest compared to those reunified with their families. We also found that arrests commonly occurred and reoccurred for young people residing in group homes, underscoring the need to understand whether specific protocols and practices in these facilities contribute to increased arrests.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424006380\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424006380","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大约5%的寄养儿童和青少年被安置在集体家庭环境中,青少年是这些安置中最大的年龄组。团体家庭安置是为了支持那些在家庭环境中无法满足的高敏度或特殊需求的个人而设计的。先前的研究强调了青少年在集体家庭中的脆弱性,包括行为问题、心理健康问题和少年司法系统的参与。目的:本研究旨在探讨青少年安置状况与被捕率之间的关系。参与者:来自加利福尼亚州的儿童保护系统记录用于识别2014年被安置在集体之家的青少年(13-17岁)(n = 2437)。这些记录与加州司法部2014年和2015年的逮捕记录相关联。方法:采用t检验和logistic回归,通过人口统计学和初次安置后的安置状况来检验逮捕状况的描述性差异。安置环境与骤停可能性之间的关系用生存分析进行了检验。结果:在我们的青少年群体中,有16.7%的人在研究期间被捕。当青少年住在集体之家(aHR = 1.57, p = 0.029)或逃离照顾(aHR = 5.62, p)时,被捕的调整风险比更高。结论:与与家人团聚的青少年相比,青少年在集体之家的时间与更高的被捕率相关。我们还发现,居住在集体之家的年轻人经常被逮捕,并一再被逮捕,这突显了我们有必要了解这些设施的具体协议和做法是否会导致逮捕人数增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arrests among adolescents with a history of foster care placements in group home settings

Background

Approximately 5 % of children and adolescents in foster care are placed in group home settings, with adolescents making up the largest age group in these placements. Group home placement is designed to support individuals with high acuity or specialized needs that cannot be met in a family-based setting. Prior research has highlighted the vulnerabilities of adolescents in group homes, including behavioral issues, mental health concerns, and juvenile justice system involvement.

Objective

The current study investigated the relationship between placement status and arrest rates among adolescents experiencing a group home placement.

Participants

Child protection system records from California were used to identify adolescents (aged 13–17) who were placed in group homes in 2014 (n = 2437). These records were linked to California Department of Justice arrest records for 2014 and 2015.

Methods

Descriptive differences in arrest status were examined by demographics and placement status after initial group home placements with t-tests and logistic regression. The association between placement setting and likelihood of arrest was examined with survival analysis.

Results

In our population of adolescents who experienced a group home placement, 16.7 % were arrested during the study window. Adjusted hazard ratios for arrest were higher when adolescents lived in group homes (aHR = 1.57, p = .029) or ran away from care (aHR = 5.62, p < .001), compared to periods in which adolescents had transitioned to reunification or guardianship. During periods where adolescents were in family foster care settings, arrest rates were comparable to those who had exited to reunification or guardianship.

Conclusion

Periods when an adolescent was in a group home setting were associated with a heightened rate of arrest compared to those reunified with their families. We also found that arrests commonly occurred and reoccurred for young people residing in group homes, underscoring the need to understand whether specific protocols and practices in these facilities contribute to increased arrests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking adverse childhood experiences: Examining the role of ACEs domains in mental health and alcohol consumption in college students Breaking the cycle: How maternal adversity shapes coercive parenting and physical harsh discipline among adolescent mothers in southern Brazil Pathways linking childhood emotional abuse and neglect to punitive attitudes: The role of interpersonal trust and emotion regulation Post-mortem fundus photographs in sudden unexpected death in infancy: An overview of the typical findings Out-of-home care and criminal conviction trajectories from adolescence to midlife: A Swedish prospective cohort study of siblings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1