在线儿童性剥削和性虐待的患病率估计和性质:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 15.5 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00329-8
Prof Deborah Fry PhD , Anna Krzeczkowska PhD , Jingru Ren MA , Mengyao Lu PhD , Prof Xiangming Fang PhD
{"title":"在线儿童性剥削和性虐待的患病率估计和性质:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Prof Deborah Fry PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Krzeczkowska PhD ,&nbsp;Jingru Ren MA ,&nbsp;Mengyao Lu PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Xiangming Fang PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00329-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA) is a global health issue. The aim of this global systematic review and meta-analysis was to better understand the prevalence and nature of OCSEA on a global scale.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive literature searches were done in six UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish) and multiple databases, for records published between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 30, 2023. Studies were evaluated independently by two different authors for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included children younger than 18 years or adults retrospectively reporting OCSEA. Studies used general population samples and were representative at the national and sub-national level. Risk of bias in prevalence studies was assessed and a synthesis of the findings produced. A random-effects model was conducted for meta-analysis of studies to calculate prevalence estimates with 95% CIs for past year recall and lifetime recall of four OCSEA subtypes and overall OCSEA (from studies that measured at least three different sub-types within the same sample). This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/6vux2).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of the 47 097 records derived from literature searches, 86 records reporting on 123 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled mean prevalence for past year recall of OCSEA subtypes was estimated: online solicitation (12·5% [95% CI 10·5–14·7]); non-consensual taking, sharing, and exposure to sexual images and videos (12·6% [9·7–16·2]); online sexual exploitation (4·7% [2·9–7·3]); and sexual extortion (3·5% [1·9–6·4]). The mean prevalence of past-year recall for overall OCSEA was 8·1% (4·9–13·0). Heterogeneity of individual estimates was high, influenced by research design factors including the method of data collection and variability in definitions used.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Heterogeneity in prevalence estimates identified across studies and regions indicates that more research is required to draw stronger conclusions about the scale of OCSEA. However, the findings of this study are of great relevance to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers to make informed decisions about allocating resources and designing effective prevention and response programmes to protect children worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The Human Dignity Foundation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54238,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Child & Adolescent Health","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence estimates and nature of online child sexual exploitation and abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Prof Deborah Fry PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Krzeczkowska PhD ,&nbsp;Jingru Ren MA ,&nbsp;Mengyao Lu PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Xiangming Fang PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00329-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA) is a global health issue. The aim of this global systematic review and meta-analysis was to better understand the prevalence and nature of OCSEA on a global scale.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive literature searches were done in six UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish) and multiple databases, for records published between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 30, 2023. Studies were evaluated independently by two different authors for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included children younger than 18 years or adults retrospectively reporting OCSEA. Studies used general population samples and were representative at the national and sub-national level. Risk of bias in prevalence studies was assessed and a synthesis of the findings produced. A random-effects model was conducted for meta-analysis of studies to calculate prevalence estimates with 95% CIs for past year recall and lifetime recall of four OCSEA subtypes and overall OCSEA (from studies that measured at least three different sub-types within the same sample). This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/6vux2).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of the 47 097 records derived from literature searches, 86 records reporting on 123 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled mean prevalence for past year recall of OCSEA subtypes was estimated: online solicitation (12·5% [95% CI 10·5–14·7]); non-consensual taking, sharing, and exposure to sexual images and videos (12·6% [9·7–16·2]); online sexual exploitation (4·7% [2·9–7·3]); and sexual extortion (3·5% [1·9–6·4]). The mean prevalence of past-year recall for overall OCSEA was 8·1% (4·9–13·0). Heterogeneity of individual estimates was high, influenced by research design factors including the method of data collection and variability in definitions used.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Heterogeneity in prevalence estimates identified across studies and regions indicates that more research is required to draw stronger conclusions about the scale of OCSEA. However, the findings of this study are of great relevance to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers to make informed decisions about allocating resources and designing effective prevention and response programmes to protect children worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The Human Dignity Foundation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Child & Adolescent Health\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Child & Adolescent Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352464224003298\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Child & Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352464224003298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:网络儿童性剥削和性虐待(OCSEA)是一个全球性的健康问题。这项全球系统回顾和荟萃分析的目的是更好地了解全球范围内OCSEA的患病率和性质。方法:对2010年1月1日至2023年9月30日期间发表的6种联合国语言(阿拉伯文、中文、英文、法文、俄文和西班牙文)和多个数据库进行综合文献检索。研究由两位不同的作者根据入选标准独立评估。符合条件的研究包括18岁以下的儿童或回顾性报告OCSEA的成年人。研究使用一般人口样本,在国家和国家以下各级具有代表性。对流行病学研究的偏倚风险进行了评估,并对研究结果进行了综合。采用随机效应模型对研究进行meta分析,以95% ci计算四种OCSEA亚型和总体OCSEA(来自测量同一样本中至少三种不同亚型的研究)的过去一年回忆率和终生回忆率的患病率估计值。本研究已在开放科学框架(osf.io/6vux2)预注册。研究结果:从文献检索中获得的47097条记录中,有86条记录报告了123项研究,纳入了本系统综述和荟萃分析。估计过去一年OCSEA亚型召回的汇总平均患病率:在线征集(12.5% [95% CI 10.5 - 14.7]);未经同意拍摄、分享和接触色情图片和视频(12.6% [9.7 - 16.2]);网络性剥削(4.7% [2,9 - 7,3]);性勒索占3.5%[1·9-6·4]。在整个OCSEA中,过去一年的平均召回率为8.1%(4.9 - 13.0)。个体估计的异质性很高,受研究设计因素的影响,包括数据收集方法和所用定义的可变性。解释:在不同研究和地区之间确定的患病率估计的异质性表明,需要更多的研究来得出关于OCSEA规模的更有力的结论。然而,这项研究的结果对决策者、从业者和研究人员做出明智的决定,分配资源和设计有效的预防和应对方案,以保护全世界的儿童具有重要意义。资助:人类尊严基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence estimates and nature of online child sexual exploitation and abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA) is a global health issue. The aim of this global systematic review and meta-analysis was to better understand the prevalence and nature of OCSEA on a global scale.

Methods

Comprehensive literature searches were done in six UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish) and multiple databases, for records published between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 30, 2023. Studies were evaluated independently by two different authors for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included children younger than 18 years or adults retrospectively reporting OCSEA. Studies used general population samples and were representative at the national and sub-national level. Risk of bias in prevalence studies was assessed and a synthesis of the findings produced. A random-effects model was conducted for meta-analysis of studies to calculate prevalence estimates with 95% CIs for past year recall and lifetime recall of four OCSEA subtypes and overall OCSEA (from studies that measured at least three different sub-types within the same sample). This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/6vux2).

Findings

Of the 47 097 records derived from literature searches, 86 records reporting on 123 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled mean prevalence for past year recall of OCSEA subtypes was estimated: online solicitation (12·5% [95% CI 10·5–14·7]); non-consensual taking, sharing, and exposure to sexual images and videos (12·6% [9·7–16·2]); online sexual exploitation (4·7% [2·9–7·3]); and sexual extortion (3·5% [1·9–6·4]). The mean prevalence of past-year recall for overall OCSEA was 8·1% (4·9–13·0). Heterogeneity of individual estimates was high, influenced by research design factors including the method of data collection and variability in definitions used.

Interpretation

Heterogeneity in prevalence estimates identified across studies and regions indicates that more research is required to draw stronger conclusions about the scale of OCSEA. However, the findings of this study are of great relevance to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers to make informed decisions about allocating resources and designing effective prevention and response programmes to protect children worldwide.

Funding

The Human Dignity Foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
40.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
381
期刊介绍: The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, presents influential original research, authoritative reviews, and insightful opinion pieces to promote the health of children from fetal development through young adulthood. This journal invite submissions that will directly impact clinical practice or child health across the disciplines of general paediatrics, adolescent medicine, or child development, and across all paediatric subspecialties including (but not limited to) allergy and immunology, cardiology, critical care, endocrinology, fetal and neonatal medicine, gastroenterology, haematology, hepatology and nutrition, infectious diseases, neurology, oncology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, and surgery. Content includes articles, reviews, viewpoints, clinical pictures, comments, and correspondence, along with series and commissions aimed at driving positive change in clinical practice and health policy in child and adolescent health.
期刊最新文献
Defining and measuring what matters: quality of life for children with disabilities Safety of in vivo gene therapy in children: mechanisms and management of liver injury Listening to the room Support without identification: a regressive shift in neurodevelopmental care? Autistic SPACE: clinician advocacy for improving school environments for autistic young people
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1