作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动免疫生物标志物的外周经典和中间单核细胞亚群

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acta medica Indonesiana Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Amaylia Oehadian, Mohammad Ghozali, Sutiadi Kusuma, Lusi Mersiana, Nadia Gita Ghassani, Fransisca Fransisca, Yitzchak Millenard Sigilipu, Andini Kartikasari, Laniyati Hamijoyo
{"title":"作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动免疫生物标志物的外周经典和中间单核细胞亚群","authors":"Amaylia Oehadian, Mohammad Ghozali, Sutiadi Kusuma, Lusi Mersiana, Nadia Gita Ghassani, Fransisca Fransisca, Yitzchak Millenard Sigilipu, Andini Kartikasari, Laniyati Hamijoyo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monocytes are evolutionarily preserved innate immune cells that play essential roles in immune response regulation. Three activated monocyte subsets-classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++)-are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) progression. This study aims to determine the association of monocyte subsets with SLE disease activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study involving 25 patients with SLE was conducted. Blood samples were collected, and monocyte subsets were identified using flow cytometry. Patients were grouped by disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) into inactive (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4) and active (SLEDAI-2K > 4). The cutoff for monocyte subsets was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine active and 16 inactive subjects were identified. Compared with individuals without active disease, individuals with active disease had significantly lower mean classical monocyte subsets (71.9% vs 88%, p = 0.008), and higher median intermediate monocytes (29.1% vs 11.1%, p = 0.019). The median nonclassical monocyte subsets were not significantly different between the two groups. The cutoff for classical monocytes in active disease was ≤72.2%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.021, with 66.7% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity; for intermediate monocytes, it was >22.3%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.014, with 66.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Classical and intermediate monocytes could be considered as immune cellular markers for identifying active SLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":6889,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Indonesiana","volume":"56 4","pages":"469-475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral Classic and Intermediate Monocyte Subsets as Immune Biomarkers of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity.\",\"authors\":\"Amaylia Oehadian, Mohammad Ghozali, Sutiadi Kusuma, Lusi Mersiana, Nadia Gita Ghassani, Fransisca Fransisca, Yitzchak Millenard Sigilipu, Andini Kartikasari, Laniyati Hamijoyo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monocytes are evolutionarily preserved innate immune cells that play essential roles in immune response regulation. Three activated monocyte subsets-classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++)-are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) progression. This study aims to determine the association of monocyte subsets with SLE disease activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study involving 25 patients with SLE was conducted. Blood samples were collected, and monocyte subsets were identified using flow cytometry. Patients were grouped by disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) into inactive (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4) and active (SLEDAI-2K > 4). The cutoff for monocyte subsets was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine active and 16 inactive subjects were identified. Compared with individuals without active disease, individuals with active disease had significantly lower mean classical monocyte subsets (71.9% vs 88%, p = 0.008), and higher median intermediate monocytes (29.1% vs 11.1%, p = 0.019). The median nonclassical monocyte subsets were not significantly different between the two groups. The cutoff for classical monocytes in active disease was ≤72.2%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.021, with 66.7% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity; for intermediate monocytes, it was >22.3%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.014, with 66.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Classical and intermediate monocytes could be considered as immune cellular markers for identifying active SLE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Indonesiana\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"469-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Indonesiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peripheral Classic and Intermediate Monocyte Subsets as Immune Biomarkers of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity.

Background: Monocytes are evolutionarily preserved innate immune cells that play essential roles in immune response regulation. Three activated monocyte subsets-classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++)-are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) progression. This study aims to determine the association of monocyte subsets with SLE disease activity.

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 25 patients with SLE was conducted. Blood samples were collected, and monocyte subsets were identified using flow cytometry. Patients were grouped by disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) into inactive (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4) and active (SLEDAI-2K > 4). The cutoff for monocyte subsets was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Nine active and 16 inactive subjects were identified. Compared with individuals without active disease, individuals with active disease had significantly lower mean classical monocyte subsets (71.9% vs 88%, p = 0.008), and higher median intermediate monocytes (29.1% vs 11.1%, p = 0.019). The median nonclassical monocyte subsets were not significantly different between the two groups. The cutoff for classical monocytes in active disease was ≤72.2%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.021, with 66.7% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity; for intermediate monocytes, it was >22.3%, AUC = 0.788, p = 0.014, with 66.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Conclusion: Classical and intermediate monocytes could be considered as immune cellular markers for identifying active SLE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Indonesiana
Acta medica Indonesiana MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Indonesiana – The Indonesian Journal of Internal Medicine is an open accessed online journal and comprehensive peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine since 1968. Our main mission is to encourage the novel and important science in the clinical area in internal medicine. We welcome authors for original articles (research), review articles, interesting case reports, special articles, clinical practices, and medical illustrations that focus on the clinical area of internal medicine. Subjects suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields of: -Allergy and immunology -Emergency medicine -Cancer and stem cells -Cardiovascular -Endocrinology and Metabolism -Gastroenterology -Gerontology -Hematology -Hepatology -Tropical and Infectious Disease -Virology -Internal medicine -Psychosomatic -Pulmonology -Rheumatology -Renal and Hypertension -Thyroid
期刊最新文献
Current Diagnosis and Therapeutic Approach of Functional Mitral Regurgitation. Cutaneous Anthrax: What is the Hallmark? Investigating Elevated E-Selectin and P-Selectin Levels in Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Patients: The Stepping Stone to a Future Clinical Approach. Outcome Prediction in Infectious Disease. Peripheral Classic and Intermediate Monocyte Subsets as Immune Biomarkers of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1