7.62x39 毫米曳光弹和 API 子弹在软组织中的行为。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112385
Wim Kerkhoff, Joas Wisse, Roelof-Jan Oostra
{"title":"7.62x39 毫米曳光弹和 API 子弹在软组织中的行为。","authors":"Wim Kerkhoff, Joas Wisse, Roelof-Jan Oostra","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some bullets, called tracer and API bullets, contain a pyrotechnical charge. The charge in the bottom of a tracer bullet burns in flight and enables the shooter or an observer to see the bullet's trajectory. An Armor Piercing Incendiary (API) bullet contains a hard core and a pyrotechnical charge that ignites on impact with a hard target. These bullets are designed to both pierce armor and ignite combustible materials. Both tracer and API bullets are quintessentially military ammunition, but some 7.62x39mm caliber variants are occasionally used in crimes. This fact triggered a study on the behavior of these bullets in soft tissue. Two different types of tracer bullets and two different types of API bullets were tested. The tracer bullets behaved similarly in a soft tissue simulant, in terms of energy transfer and deflection. These bullets deflected more from their original trajectory than the tested API bullets and the full metal jacket (FMJ) bullets that were tested as a reference. The two types of API bullets behaved completely different in the soft tissue simulant, especially in terms of energy transfer. One type yawed very late in the simulant and stayed intact, transferring little kinetic energy. The other type yawed early and disintegrated in the simulant, transferring much more of its kinetic energy, causing massive tissue (simulant) disruption. The difference in bullet behaviour was caused by a small but important difference in bullet design with the two types of API bullets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"367 ","pages":"112385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviour of 7.62x39mm tracer and API bullets in soft tissue.\",\"authors\":\"Wim Kerkhoff, Joas Wisse, Roelof-Jan Oostra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some bullets, called tracer and API bullets, contain a pyrotechnical charge. The charge in the bottom of a tracer bullet burns in flight and enables the shooter or an observer to see the bullet's trajectory. An Armor Piercing Incendiary (API) bullet contains a hard core and a pyrotechnical charge that ignites on impact with a hard target. These bullets are designed to both pierce armor and ignite combustible materials. Both tracer and API bullets are quintessentially military ammunition, but some 7.62x39mm caliber variants are occasionally used in crimes. This fact triggered a study on the behavior of these bullets in soft tissue. Two different types of tracer bullets and two different types of API bullets were tested. The tracer bullets behaved similarly in a soft tissue simulant, in terms of energy transfer and deflection. These bullets deflected more from their original trajectory than the tested API bullets and the full metal jacket (FMJ) bullets that were tested as a reference. The two types of API bullets behaved completely different in the soft tissue simulant, especially in terms of energy transfer. One type yawed very late in the simulant and stayed intact, transferring little kinetic energy. The other type yawed early and disintegrated in the simulant, transferring much more of its kinetic energy, causing massive tissue (simulant) disruption. The difference in bullet behaviour was caused by a small but important difference in bullet design with the two types of API bullets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"367 \",\"pages\":\"112385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112385\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behaviour of 7.62x39mm tracer and API bullets in soft tissue.

Some bullets, called tracer and API bullets, contain a pyrotechnical charge. The charge in the bottom of a tracer bullet burns in flight and enables the shooter or an observer to see the bullet's trajectory. An Armor Piercing Incendiary (API) bullet contains a hard core and a pyrotechnical charge that ignites on impact with a hard target. These bullets are designed to both pierce armor and ignite combustible materials. Both tracer and API bullets are quintessentially military ammunition, but some 7.62x39mm caliber variants are occasionally used in crimes. This fact triggered a study on the behavior of these bullets in soft tissue. Two different types of tracer bullets and two different types of API bullets were tested. The tracer bullets behaved similarly in a soft tissue simulant, in terms of energy transfer and deflection. These bullets deflected more from their original trajectory than the tested API bullets and the full metal jacket (FMJ) bullets that were tested as a reference. The two types of API bullets behaved completely different in the soft tissue simulant, especially in terms of energy transfer. One type yawed very late in the simulant and stayed intact, transferring little kinetic energy. The other type yawed early and disintegrated in the simulant, transferring much more of its kinetic energy, causing massive tissue (simulant) disruption. The difference in bullet behaviour was caused by a small but important difference in bullet design with the two types of API bullets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Behaviour of 7.62x39mm tracer and API bullets in soft tissue. Effect of UV exposure on DNA deposited on drug capsules. Methods of extraction of genetic material from hard tissues: A review of the 21st century advancements. Computational forensic identification of deceased using 3D bone segmentation and registration. Investigating the protein modification and degradation under the influence of petrol and kerosene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1