第一,不要伤害(你训练的人)。

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS Linacre Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1177/00243639241311315
J Brewer Eberly, Benjamin W Frush
{"title":"第一,不要伤害(你训练的人)。","authors":"J Brewer Eberly, Benjamin W Frush","doi":"10.1177/00243639241311315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Primum non nocere</i> or \"first, do no harm\" is perhaps the most well-known aphorism in the culture of medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians have an obligation to recognize their role as moral teachers and coaches, who must consider \"first, do no harm\" not only when considering their patients but also when weighing the moral formation of their trainees, especially in a season in which medical educators are attempting to clarify the \"harms\" of medical training. This multi-valent vision of \"first, do no harm\" offers an alternative way to frame the contemporary difficulties of medical education while inviting a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training, in which it can be difficult to discern between that which is truly harm and that which is merely \"hard.\" For those situations in which it is unclear-or indeed when harm is unavoidable-it may be through communal practices of reharmonization, reincorporation, and \"reharm\" that master educators might learn to tell the story of good medicine with their trainees anew, fostering moral articulacy for the trainees to whom they must also \"first, do no harm.\"</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong><i>Primum non nocere</i> or \"first, do no harm\" is among the most well-known proverbs in medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians might consider \"first, do no harm\" not only when considering their patients but also when considering the moral formation of their trainees. In a season when medical educators are attempting to clarify the \"harms\" of medical training, this reading can invite a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"137-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First, Do No Harm (to the One You Train).\",\"authors\":\"J Brewer Eberly, Benjamin W Frush\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00243639241311315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Primum non nocere</i> or \\\"first, do no harm\\\" is perhaps the most well-known aphorism in the culture of medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians have an obligation to recognize their role as moral teachers and coaches, who must consider \\\"first, do no harm\\\" not only when considering their patients but also when weighing the moral formation of their trainees, especially in a season in which medical educators are attempting to clarify the \\\"harms\\\" of medical training. This multi-valent vision of \\\"first, do no harm\\\" offers an alternative way to frame the contemporary difficulties of medical education while inviting a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training, in which it can be difficult to discern between that which is truly harm and that which is merely \\\"hard.\\\" For those situations in which it is unclear-or indeed when harm is unavoidable-it may be through communal practices of reharmonization, reincorporation, and \\\"reharm\\\" that master educators might learn to tell the story of good medicine with their trainees anew, fostering moral articulacy for the trainees to whom they must also \\\"first, do no harm.\\\"</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong><i>Primum non nocere</i> or \\\"first, do no harm\\\" is among the most well-known proverbs in medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians might consider \\\"first, do no harm\\\" not only when considering their patients but also when considering the moral formation of their trainees. In a season when medical educators are attempting to clarify the \\\"harms\\\" of medical training, this reading can invite a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"137-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241311315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241311315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“不伤害他人”或许是医学教育文化中最广为人知的格言。虽然这项禁令适用于病人是众所周知的,但它也可以被解读为医疗实习生。教学医生有义务认识到他们作为道德教师和教练的作用,不仅在考虑病人时,而且在衡量受训者的道德形成时,特别是在医学教育者试图澄清医学培训的“危害”的时候,他们必须考虑“首先,不造成伤害”。这种“首先,不伤害”的多重视角提供了另一种方式来构建当代医学教育的困难,同时邀请教师和学习者之间就医学培训的经历进行更坦诚、更细致的讨论,在这种情况下,很难区分哪些是真正的伤害,哪些只是“困难”。对于那些不清楚的情况,或者当伤害是不可避免的时候,可能是通过重新协调、重新整合和“重新伤害”的公共实践,大师教育者可以学会向他们的学员重新讲述好医学的故事,培养学员的道德表达能力,他们也必须“首先,不伤害”。总结:“首先不伤害”是医学教育中最著名的谚语之一。虽然这项禁令适用于病人是众所周知的,但它也可以被解读为医疗实习生。教学医生不仅在考虑病人时,而且在考虑受训者的道德形成时,可能会考虑“第一,不伤害”。在医学教育者试图澄清医学培训的“危害”的时候,这本书可以在教师和学习者之间就医学培训的经历进行更坦诚、更细致的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First, Do No Harm (to the One You Train).

Primum non nocere or "first, do no harm" is perhaps the most well-known aphorism in the culture of medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians have an obligation to recognize their role as moral teachers and coaches, who must consider "first, do no harm" not only when considering their patients but also when weighing the moral formation of their trainees, especially in a season in which medical educators are attempting to clarify the "harms" of medical training. This multi-valent vision of "first, do no harm" offers an alternative way to frame the contemporary difficulties of medical education while inviting a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training, in which it can be difficult to discern between that which is truly harm and that which is merely "hard." For those situations in which it is unclear-or indeed when harm is unavoidable-it may be through communal practices of reharmonization, reincorporation, and "reharm" that master educators might learn to tell the story of good medicine with their trainees anew, fostering moral articulacy for the trainees to whom they must also "first, do no harm."

Summary: Primum non nocere or "first, do no harm" is among the most well-known proverbs in medical education. While its application to patients is well known, the injunction can also be read with medical trainees in mind. Teaching physicians might consider "first, do no harm" not only when considering their patients but also when considering the moral formation of their trainees. In a season when medical educators are attempting to clarify the "harms" of medical training, this reading can invite a more candid, nuanced discourse between teachers and learners about the experiences of medical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Cry of the Flesh: A Catholic Perspective on Cutting. Faith as a Moral Determinant of Health: Toward a Population Health Paradigm Shift. When the Physician Becomes the Patient: Suffering, Surrender, and the Formation of a Catholic Medical Vocation. The Forgotten Encyclical: Why Evangelium Vitae Still Matters. Total Parental Nutrition as a Proportionate Means of Conserving Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1