儿童数量与痴呆风险:使用与挪威国家登记处相关的HUNT研究数据进行的因果中介分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12883-025-04044-4
Teferi Mekonnen, Vegard Skirbekk, Ekaterina Zotcheva, Bo Engdahl, Bernt Bratsberg, Astanand Jugessur, Catherine Bowen, Geir Selbæk, Hans-Peter Kohler, Jennifer R Harris, Sarah E Tom, Steinar Krokstad, Trine Holt Edwin, Yehani Wedatilake, Katrin Wolfova, Dana Kristjansson, Yaakov Stern, Asta Kristine Håberg, Bjørn Heine Strand
{"title":"儿童数量与痴呆风险:使用与挪威国家登记处相关的HUNT研究数据进行的因果中介分析。","authors":"Teferi Mekonnen, Vegard Skirbekk, Ekaterina Zotcheva, Bo Engdahl, Bernt Bratsberg, Astanand Jugessur, Catherine Bowen, Geir Selbæk, Hans-Peter Kohler, Jennifer R Harris, Sarah E Tom, Steinar Krokstad, Trine Holt Edwin, Yehani Wedatilake, Katrin Wolfova, Dana Kristjansson, Yaakov Stern, Asta Kristine Håberg, Bjørn Heine Strand","doi":"10.1186/s12883-025-04044-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childlessness, as well as having a high number of children, has been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of dementia compared to having 2-3 children. The mechanisms underlying these relationships are not well understood and may be mediated by different midlife risk factors. We examined the mediating role of various factors on the relationship between the number of children and dementia risk. These factors include socioeconomic factors (e.g., occupational complexity), psychosocial (e.g.., social activities, loneliness, life satisfaction), lifestyle (e.g., smoking, physical inactivity, alcohol intake), and chronic diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, depression, hearing impairment and hypertension).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a historic cohort design, we included 9,745 participants born between 1931-48, with a mean age of 78.2 (SD = 6.4) years at the time of cognitive testing in the HUNT4 70 + sub-study (2017-2019). Further measures were obtained through data linkage between information from Statistics Norway and the HUNT1(1984-86), and HUNT2 (1995-97) Surveys. Causal mediation analyses using an inverse odd weighting approach were conducted to decompose the total effect of the number of children (0, 1, or 4 + children vs. 2-3) on the risk of dementia at age 70 + years into direct and indirect effects with mediators assessed at a mean age of 50.7 (SD = 6.4) years. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, marital status at age 25 years, educational status, and religion assessed during HUNT3 (2006-2008).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 15.7% were diagnosed with dementia. The proportions with dementia by the number of children were 22.3% among those with no children, 21.4% for those with one child, 13% for those with 2-3 children (specifically, 12.6% for those with 2 children and 13.4% for those with 3 children), and 19.9% for those with 4 + children. Compared to the reference group of individuals with 2-3 children, the dementia risk was higher among the groups with no children (relative risk (RR): 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.12, 1.51)), those with one child (RR: 1.30, 95% CI (1.14, 1.47)) and those with 4 + children (RR: 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.24)). The elevated risks of dementia were not mediated by the socioeconomic, psychosocial, lifestyle, or chronic diseases related factors that we tested. Sex-stratified analysis showed higher dementia risk for men without children and women with one or 4 + children compared to those with 2-3 children, with similar patterns across sexes. None of the mediators contributed to mediation in either group. None of the mediators appeared to contribute through mediation in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the number of children-specifically being childless, having one child, or having four or more children-may influence the risk of dementia. These relationships were not mediated by psychosocial, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors, or markers of chronic diseases in adulthood considered in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Number of children and dementia risk: a causal mediation analysis using data from the HUNT study linked with national registries in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Teferi Mekonnen, Vegard Skirbekk, Ekaterina Zotcheva, Bo Engdahl, Bernt Bratsberg, Astanand Jugessur, Catherine Bowen, Geir Selbæk, Hans-Peter Kohler, Jennifer R Harris, Sarah E Tom, Steinar Krokstad, Trine Holt Edwin, Yehani Wedatilake, Katrin Wolfova, Dana Kristjansson, Yaakov Stern, Asta Kristine Håberg, Bjørn Heine Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-025-04044-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childlessness, as well as having a high number of children, has been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of dementia compared to having 2-3 children. The mechanisms underlying these relationships are not well understood and may be mediated by different midlife risk factors. We examined the mediating role of various factors on the relationship between the number of children and dementia risk. These factors include socioeconomic factors (e.g., occupational complexity), psychosocial (e.g.., social activities, loneliness, life satisfaction), lifestyle (e.g., smoking, physical inactivity, alcohol intake), and chronic diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, depression, hearing impairment and hypertension).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a historic cohort design, we included 9,745 participants born between 1931-48, with a mean age of 78.2 (SD = 6.4) years at the time of cognitive testing in the HUNT4 70 + sub-study (2017-2019). Further measures were obtained through data linkage between information from Statistics Norway and the HUNT1(1984-86), and HUNT2 (1995-97) Surveys. Causal mediation analyses using an inverse odd weighting approach were conducted to decompose the total effect of the number of children (0, 1, or 4 + children vs. 2-3) on the risk of dementia at age 70 + years into direct and indirect effects with mediators assessed at a mean age of 50.7 (SD = 6.4) years. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, marital status at age 25 years, educational status, and religion assessed during HUNT3 (2006-2008).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 15.7% were diagnosed with dementia. The proportions with dementia by the number of children were 22.3% among those with no children, 21.4% for those with one child, 13% for those with 2-3 children (specifically, 12.6% for those with 2 children and 13.4% for those with 3 children), and 19.9% for those with 4 + children. Compared to the reference group of individuals with 2-3 children, the dementia risk was higher among the groups with no children (relative risk (RR): 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.12, 1.51)), those with one child (RR: 1.30, 95% CI (1.14, 1.47)) and those with 4 + children (RR: 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.24)). The elevated risks of dementia were not mediated by the socioeconomic, psychosocial, lifestyle, or chronic diseases related factors that we tested. Sex-stratified analysis showed higher dementia risk for men without children and women with one or 4 + children compared to those with 2-3 children, with similar patterns across sexes. None of the mediators contributed to mediation in either group. None of the mediators appeared to contribute through mediation in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the number of children-specifically being childless, having one child, or having four or more children-may influence the risk of dementia. These relationships were not mediated by psychosocial, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors, or markers of chronic diseases in adulthood considered in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04044-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04044-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,与有2-3个孩子的人相比,没有孩子以及有很多孩子的人患痴呆症的风险更高。这些关系背后的机制尚不清楚,可能是由不同的中年危险因素介导的。我们检查了各种因素对儿童数量与痴呆风险之间关系的中介作用。这些因素包括社会经济因素(如职业复杂性)、社会心理因素(如……(如社会活动、孤独、生活满意度)、生活方式(如吸烟、缺乏体育活动、饮酒)和慢性疾病(如肥胖、糖尿病、抑郁症、听力障碍和高血压)。方法:采用历史队列设计,我们在HUNT4 70 +子研究(2017-2019)中纳入了9,745名出生于1931-48年之间的参与者,在认知测试时平均年龄为78.2 (SD = 6.4)岁。通过挪威统计局与HUNT1(1984-86)和HUNT2(1995-97)调查的信息之间的数据联系,获得了进一步的措施。采用反向奇数加权法进行因果中介分析,将儿童数量(0、1或4 +儿童vs. 2-3)对70岁以上痴呆风险的总影响分解为直接和间接影响,并在平均年龄50.7 (SD = 6.4)岁时评估中介。在HUNT3(2006-2008)期间,对年龄、性别、25岁时的婚姻状况、教育状况和宗教进行了调整。结果:总体而言,15.7%的患者被诊断为痴呆。按子女数计算,无子女者患痴呆症的比例为22.3%,有1子女者为21.4%,有2-3子女者为13%(有2子女者为12.6%,有3子女者为13.4%),有4子女者为19.9%。与有2-3个孩子的参照组相比,没有孩子的组(相对危险度(RR): 1.30, 95%可信区间(CI)(1.12, 1.51))、有一个孩子的组(RR: 1.30, 95% CI(1.14, 1.47))和有4个以上孩子的组(RR: 1.12, 95% CI(1.01, 1.24))的痴呆风险更高。痴呆风险升高与我们测试的社会经济、社会心理、生活方式或慢性病相关因素无关。性别分层分析显示,与有2-3个孩子的女性相比,没有孩子的男性和有一个或四个以上孩子的女性患痴呆症的风险更高,性别模式相似。两组中没有调解员参与调解。两组的调解员似乎都没有通过调解做出贡献。结论:我们的研究结果表明,孩子的数量——特别是没有孩子、有一个孩子、有四个或更多孩子——可能会影响患痴呆症的风险。这些关系不是由社会心理、生活方式和社会经济因素介导的,也不是本研究中考虑的成年期慢性疾病的标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Number of children and dementia risk: a causal mediation analysis using data from the HUNT study linked with national registries in Norway.

Background: Childlessness, as well as having a high number of children, has been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of dementia compared to having 2-3 children. The mechanisms underlying these relationships are not well understood and may be mediated by different midlife risk factors. We examined the mediating role of various factors on the relationship between the number of children and dementia risk. These factors include socioeconomic factors (e.g., occupational complexity), psychosocial (e.g.., social activities, loneliness, life satisfaction), lifestyle (e.g., smoking, physical inactivity, alcohol intake), and chronic diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, depression, hearing impairment and hypertension).

Methods: Using a historic cohort design, we included 9,745 participants born between 1931-48, with a mean age of 78.2 (SD = 6.4) years at the time of cognitive testing in the HUNT4 70 + sub-study (2017-2019). Further measures were obtained through data linkage between information from Statistics Norway and the HUNT1(1984-86), and HUNT2 (1995-97) Surveys. Causal mediation analyses using an inverse odd weighting approach were conducted to decompose the total effect of the number of children (0, 1, or 4 + children vs. 2-3) on the risk of dementia at age 70 + years into direct and indirect effects with mediators assessed at a mean age of 50.7 (SD = 6.4) years. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, marital status at age 25 years, educational status, and religion assessed during HUNT3 (2006-2008).

Results: Overall, 15.7% were diagnosed with dementia. The proportions with dementia by the number of children were 22.3% among those with no children, 21.4% for those with one child, 13% for those with 2-3 children (specifically, 12.6% for those with 2 children and 13.4% for those with 3 children), and 19.9% for those with 4 + children. Compared to the reference group of individuals with 2-3 children, the dementia risk was higher among the groups with no children (relative risk (RR): 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.12, 1.51)), those with one child (RR: 1.30, 95% CI (1.14, 1.47)) and those with 4 + children (RR: 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.24)). The elevated risks of dementia were not mediated by the socioeconomic, psychosocial, lifestyle, or chronic diseases related factors that we tested. Sex-stratified analysis showed higher dementia risk for men without children and women with one or 4 + children compared to those with 2-3 children, with similar patterns across sexes. None of the mediators contributed to mediation in either group. None of the mediators appeared to contribute through mediation in either group.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the number of children-specifically being childless, having one child, or having four or more children-may influence the risk of dementia. These relationships were not mediated by psychosocial, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors, or markers of chronic diseases in adulthood considered in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) in a 4-month-old infant: a case report. Efficacy and safety of treatment strategies for early neurological deterioration after acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Factors associated with improvement in gait disturbance of polyneuropathy in POEMS syndrome. Systematic review of prevalence of pain among people with dementia living in the community. Adenylate kinase 5 autoimmune encephalitis following craniopharyngioma radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1