Influence of operator experience on the complete-arch accuracy and time-based efficiency of three intraoral scanners

Background/purpose

The performance of intraoral scanners (IOSs) relies on the operator's skills. However, whether operator experience influences IOS accuracy remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of operator experience on the trueness accuracy and time-based efficiency of IOSs.

Materials and methods

Thirty operators were equally divided into two groups on the basis of their IOS-handling experience. Each operator performed simulation scans of a maxillary model in a training dummy by using three IOSs: CEREC Omnicam, Primescan, and Aoralscan 3. A total of 90 scans were generated, and the scan time for image acquisition and the render time required for an IOS to generate a three-dimensional image were recorded. The trueness of each scan was calculated by comparing with a reference scan obtained from an industrial high-precision scanner. The t test and the ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test were used to determine statistical differences. Significance was set at P < 0.01.

Results

For the three IOSs, no significant difference was noted in trueness accuracy, scan time, or render time between inexperienced and experienced operators. For both inexperienced and experienced operators, Omnicam had significantly less accuracy and longer scan time than did the other IOSs; the render time was significantly shorter for Aoralscan 3 than for the other IOSs.

Conclusion

Operator experience does not substantially influence the trueness accuracy and time-based efficiency of IOSs; these factors vary across IOS types. The render time for obtaining three-dimensional images is a significant feature for improving the time-based efficiency of IOSs.