西妥昔单抗对曾接受免疫疗法治疗的复发性和转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌疗效的相关性

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00741
Jong Chul Park, Jong Seok Ahn, Ross Merkin, Manisha Patel, Lori Wirth, Thomas J Roberts
{"title":"西妥昔单抗对曾接受免疫疗法治疗的复发性和转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌疗效的相关性","authors":"Jong Chul Park, Jong Seok Ahn, Ross Merkin, Manisha Patel, Lori Wirth, Thomas J Roberts","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now first-line therapy for most patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), and cetuximab is most often used as subsequent therapy. However, data describing cetuximab efficacy in the post-ICI setting are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, after receiving an ICI. We extracted objective response rate (ORR), duration of treatment (DOT), and overall survival (OS) and compared them on the basis of patient characteristics. Multivariable models assessed associations between patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 70 patients treated with cetuximab after an ICI. The mean age was 67.6 years, with 60% having virus-associated HNSCC. Overall, the ORR was 21.4%, the median DOT was 1.9 months, and the median OS was 6.3 months. Patients receiving cetuximab with chemotherapy had a higher ORR (27.7% <i>v</i> 8.7%) and longer median DOT but similar OS compared with monotherapy. Virus-independent HNSCC had higher ORR (28.6% <i>v</i> 10.7%), longer DOT (3.3 <i>v</i> 1.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.90]), and longer OS (8.1 <i>v</i> 4.6 months; HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83]). In multivariable models, virus-independent disease and negative smoking history were associated with improved OS. Concurrent chemotherapy, age, and sex were not associated with differences in OS. When assessing genomic data, <i>TP53</i> mutations were associated with improved DOT (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.70]) and OS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cetuximab-based therapy shows limited efficacy in R/M HNSCC post-ICI, although outcomes were better in virus-independent HNSCC and nonsmokers. The findings may improve prognostication and patient selection for cetuximab after ICI in R/M HNSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlates of Cetuximab Efficacy in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Immunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Chul Park, Jong Seok Ahn, Ross Merkin, Manisha Patel, Lori Wirth, Thomas J Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-24-00741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now first-line therapy for most patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), and cetuximab is most often used as subsequent therapy. However, data describing cetuximab efficacy in the post-ICI setting are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, after receiving an ICI. We extracted objective response rate (ORR), duration of treatment (DOT), and overall survival (OS) and compared them on the basis of patient characteristics. Multivariable models assessed associations between patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 70 patients treated with cetuximab after an ICI. The mean age was 67.6 years, with 60% having virus-associated HNSCC. Overall, the ORR was 21.4%, the median DOT was 1.9 months, and the median OS was 6.3 months. Patients receiving cetuximab with chemotherapy had a higher ORR (27.7% <i>v</i> 8.7%) and longer median DOT but similar OS compared with monotherapy. Virus-independent HNSCC had higher ORR (28.6% <i>v</i> 10.7%), longer DOT (3.3 <i>v</i> 1.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.90]), and longer OS (8.1 <i>v</i> 4.6 months; HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83]). In multivariable models, virus-independent disease and negative smoking history were associated with improved OS. Concurrent chemotherapy, age, and sex were not associated with differences in OS. When assessing genomic data, <i>TP53</i> mutations were associated with improved DOT (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.70]) and OS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cetuximab-based therapy shows limited efficacy in R/M HNSCC post-ICI, although outcomes were better in virus-independent HNSCC and nonsmokers. The findings may improve prognostication and patient selection for cetuximab after ICI in R/M HNSCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为大多数复发/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)患者的一线疗法,西妥昔单抗最常作为后续疗法使用。然而,描述西妥昔单抗在 ICI 后的疗效的数据非常有限:我们对接受 ICI 后接受西妥昔单抗单药或联合化疗的 R/M HNSCC 患者进行了单机构回顾性分析。我们提取了客观反应率(ORR)、治疗持续时间(DOT)和总生存期(OS),并根据患者特征进行了比较。多变量模型评估了患者和肿瘤特征与结果之间的关联:我们共发现了 70 名在 ICI 后接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者。平均年龄为67.6岁,60%的患者患有病毒相关的HNSCC。总体而言,ORR 为 21.4%,中位 DOT 为 1.9 个月,中位 OS 为 6.3 个月。与单药治疗相比,接受西妥昔单抗联合化疗的患者ORR更高(27.7% 对 8.7%),中位DOT更长,但OS相似。病毒依赖型HNSCC的ORR更高(28.6%对10.7%),DOT时间更长(3.3个月对1.2个月;危险比[HR],0.47[95% CI,0.25对0.90]),OS时间更长(8.1个月对4.6个月;HR,0.40[95% CI,0.19对0.83])。在多变量模型中,病毒依赖性疾病和阴性吸烟史与OS的改善有关。同期化疗、年龄和性别与OS的差异无关。在评估基因组数据时,TP53突变与DOT(HR,0.33 [95% CI,0.15至0.70])和OS(HR,0.38 [95% CI,0.17至0.86])的改善有关:基于西妥昔单抗的疗法对ICI后R/M HNSCC的疗效有限,但对病毒依赖型HNSCC和非吸烟者的疗效较好。这些发现可改善R/M HNSCC ICI后西妥昔单抗治疗的预后和患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlates of Cetuximab Efficacy in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Immunotherapy.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now first-line therapy for most patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), and cetuximab is most often used as subsequent therapy. However, data describing cetuximab efficacy in the post-ICI setting are limited.

Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, after receiving an ICI. We extracted objective response rate (ORR), duration of treatment (DOT), and overall survival (OS) and compared them on the basis of patient characteristics. Multivariable models assessed associations between patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes.

Results: We identified 70 patients treated with cetuximab after an ICI. The mean age was 67.6 years, with 60% having virus-associated HNSCC. Overall, the ORR was 21.4%, the median DOT was 1.9 months, and the median OS was 6.3 months. Patients receiving cetuximab with chemotherapy had a higher ORR (27.7% v 8.7%) and longer median DOT but similar OS compared with monotherapy. Virus-independent HNSCC had higher ORR (28.6% v 10.7%), longer DOT (3.3 v 1.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.90]), and longer OS (8.1 v 4.6 months; HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83]). In multivariable models, virus-independent disease and negative smoking history were associated with improved OS. Concurrent chemotherapy, age, and sex were not associated with differences in OS. When assessing genomic data, TP53 mutations were associated with improved DOT (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.70]) and OS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86]).

Conclusion: Cetuximab-based therapy shows limited efficacy in R/M HNSCC post-ICI, although outcomes were better in virus-independent HNSCC and nonsmokers. The findings may improve prognostication and patient selection for cetuximab after ICI in R/M HNSCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
Improving Individualized Rhabdomyosarcoma Prognosis Predictions Using Somatic Molecular Biomarkers. Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With PTEN Loss: Results From NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols Z1G and Z1H. Precision-Guided Durable Response From Venetoclax With Decitabine in a Patient With a Metastatic Refractory IDH2-Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma. Comparison of PREMM5 and PREMMplus Risk Assessment Models to Identify Lynch Syndrome. Detecting Early Recurrence With Circulating Tumor DNA in Stage I-III Biliary Tract Cancer After Curative Resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1