RDAVR与冠状动脉血运重建的疗效:德国 INCA 登记的 3 年结果。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2508-0732
Aristidis Lenos, Justus T Strauch, Markus Schlömicher, Felix Fleissner, Diana M Valencia-Nunez, Jens Garbade, Roman Gottardi, Parwis Massoudy, Markus Kamler, Rizwan Malik, Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker, Thomas Walther, Jan Gummert, Peter Bramlage, Anno Diegeler
{"title":"RDAVR与冠状动脉血运重建的疗效:德国 INCA 登记的 3 年结果。","authors":"Aristidis Lenos, Justus T Strauch, Markus Schlömicher, Felix Fleissner, Diana M Valencia-Nunez, Jens Garbade, Roman Gottardi, Parwis Massoudy, Markus Kamler, Rizwan Malik, Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker, Thomas Walther, Jan Gummert, Peter Bramlage, Anno Diegeler","doi":"10.1055/a-2508-0732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The long-term outcomes of combined rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are not well explored. We report 3-year results from the INCA registry on combined RDAVR with CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> INCA is a prospective, multicenter registry that enrolled 224 patients undergoing RDAVR with CABG at 10 cardiac institutions in Germany. Prosthetic valve hemodynamics, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) up to 3 years were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The mean age of patients was 73.6 ± 6.1 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.8 ± 6.0%. The mean number of distal arterial and venous anastomoses was 3.13 ± 1.56, aortic cross-clamp time was 79.4 ± 24.1 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 109.6 ± 34.5 minutes, and operation time was 224.2 ± 62.7 minutes. The majority of implanted valve size was 25 mm. At baseline, 11 patients (4.9.%) had a permanent pacemaker. Postoperatively, 17 patients (7.6%) required a new pacemaker implantation (5.4% valve-related). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 2.2%, and 11.2% at 3 years. Patient QoL (SF-12v2) was significantly restored and maintained for up to 3 years (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Five patients (0.9%) underwent reoperation related to endocarditis. The postimplant mean gradient was 9.2 ± 3.7 at discharge and 8.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Combined RDAVR with CABG procedure is safe and effective over time. It offers stable and low transvalvular gradients with satisfactory clinical outcomes at 3 years. The pacemaker rate appears to be slightly increased, with no significant clinical effect at 3 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of RDAVR with Coronary Revascularization: 3-year Results from the German INCA Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Aristidis Lenos, Justus T Strauch, Markus Schlömicher, Felix Fleissner, Diana M Valencia-Nunez, Jens Garbade, Roman Gottardi, Parwis Massoudy, Markus Kamler, Rizwan Malik, Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker, Thomas Walther, Jan Gummert, Peter Bramlage, Anno Diegeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2508-0732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The long-term outcomes of combined rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are not well explored. We report 3-year results from the INCA registry on combined RDAVR with CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> INCA is a prospective, multicenter registry that enrolled 224 patients undergoing RDAVR with CABG at 10 cardiac institutions in Germany. Prosthetic valve hemodynamics, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) up to 3 years were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The mean age of patients was 73.6 ± 6.1 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.8 ± 6.0%. The mean number of distal arterial and venous anastomoses was 3.13 ± 1.56, aortic cross-clamp time was 79.4 ± 24.1 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 109.6 ± 34.5 minutes, and operation time was 224.2 ± 62.7 minutes. The majority of implanted valve size was 25 mm. At baseline, 11 patients (4.9.%) had a permanent pacemaker. Postoperatively, 17 patients (7.6%) required a new pacemaker implantation (5.4% valve-related). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 2.2%, and 11.2% at 3 years. Patient QoL (SF-12v2) was significantly restored and maintained for up to 3 years (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Five patients (0.9%) underwent reoperation related to endocarditis. The postimplant mean gradient was 9.2 ± 3.7 at discharge and 8.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Combined RDAVR with CABG procedure is safe and effective over time. It offers stable and low transvalvular gradients with satisfactory clinical outcomes at 3 years. The pacemaker rate appears to be slightly increased, with no significant clinical effect at 3 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2508-0732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2508-0732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of RDAVR with Coronary Revascularization: 3-year Results from the German INCA Registry.

Background:  The long-term outcomes of combined rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are not well explored. We report 3-year results from the INCA registry on combined RDAVR with CABG.

Methods:  INCA is a prospective, multicenter registry that enrolled 224 patients undergoing RDAVR with CABG at 10 cardiac institutions in Germany. Prosthetic valve hemodynamics, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) up to 3 years were assessed.

Results:  The mean age of patients was 73.6 ± 6.1 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.8 ± 6.0%. The mean number of distal arterial and venous anastomoses was 3.13 ± 1.56, aortic cross-clamp time was 79.4 ± 24.1 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 109.6 ± 34.5 minutes, and operation time was 224.2 ± 62.7 minutes. The majority of implanted valve size was 25 mm. At baseline, 11 patients (4.9.%) had a permanent pacemaker. Postoperatively, 17 patients (7.6%) required a new pacemaker implantation (5.4% valve-related). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 2.2%, and 11.2% at 3 years. Patient QoL (SF-12v2) was significantly restored and maintained for up to 3 years (p < 0.001). Five patients (0.9%) underwent reoperation related to endocarditis. The postimplant mean gradient was 9.2 ± 3.7 at discharge and 8.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg at 3 years.

Conclusion:  Combined RDAVR with CABG procedure is safe and effective over time. It offers stable and low transvalvular gradients with satisfactory clinical outcomes at 3 years. The pacemaker rate appears to be slightly increased, with no significant clinical effect at 3 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Balloon Dilatation and Stent Implantation in Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome. Role of the Goddard Score in Predicting Prolonged Air Leak in Pulmonary Segmentectomies. Comparison of Long-Term Performance of Porcine versus Pericardial Bioprostheses. Are YouTube Videos Useful in Robot-assisted Segmentectomy Education? Standardization of Myocardial Protection: Comment on Cardiac Surgery 2023 Reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1