拙劣的学术研究和未被承认的偏见：对Walker等人（2025）的评论。

IF 12.3 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Psychologist Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1037/amp0001433

Roy Eidelson

{"title":"拙劣的学术研究和未被承认的偏见：对Walker等人（2025）的评论。","authors":"Roy Eidelson","doi":"10.1037/amp0001433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article by Walker et al. (2025) titled \"The American Psychological Association and Antisemitism: Toward Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion\" regrettably suffers from serious shortcomings in regard to scholarship. These include flawed analyses, an overreliance on unreliable and biased sources, and the presentation of provocative and significant claims without any documentation at all. There is no question that deep fears about resurgent antisemitism are legitimate and deserving of dedicated attention. However, as summarized here, on multiple fronts, this article fails to accurately illuminate these risks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"80 1","pages":"120-121"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor scholarship and unacknowledged bias: Commentary on Walker et al. (2025).\",\"authors\":\"Roy Eidelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article by Walker et al. (2025) titled \\\"The American Psychological Association and Antisemitism: Toward Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion\\\" regrettably suffers from serious shortcomings in regard to scholarship. These include flawed analyses, an overreliance on unreliable and biased sources, and the presentation of provocative and significant claims without any documentation at all. There is no question that deep fears about resurgent antisemitism are legitimate and deserving of dedicated attention. However, as summarized here, on multiple fronts, this article fails to accurately illuminate these risks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"120-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001433\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

沃克等人（2025）的一篇名为《美国心理协会和反犹主义：走向平等、多样性和包容性》的文章在学术研究方面存在严重缺陷，令人遗憾。这些错误包括有缺陷的分析，过度依赖不可靠和有偏见的来源，以及在没有任何文件的情况下提出具有挑衅性和重大意义的主张。毫无疑问，对反犹主义死灰复燃的深切担忧是合理的，值得我们特别关注。然而，正如这里总结的那样，在多个方面，本文未能准确地阐明这些风险。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Poor scholarship and unacknowledged bias: Commentary on Walker et al. (2025).

The article by Walker et al. (2025) titled "The American Psychological Association and Antisemitism: Toward Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion" regrettably suffers from serious shortcomings in regard to scholarship. These include flawed analyses, an overreliance on unreliable and biased sources, and the presentation of provocative and significant claims without any documentation at all. There is no question that deep fears about resurgent antisemitism are legitimate and deserving of dedicated attention. However, as summarized here, on multiple fronts, this article fails to accurately illuminate these risks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

18.50

自引率

1.20%

发文量

145

期刊介绍： Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.