Hu hang , Wang yiran , Jiang Hongfei , Huang Man , Han chunmao
{"title":"多学科合作救治15名大面积烧伤伤员的经验:2020年6月13日浙江液化天然气油轮爆炸。","authors":"Hu hang , Wang yiran , Jiang Hongfei , Huang Man , Han chunmao","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) > 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 107361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of multidisciplinary cooperation in treating 15 extensively burned casualties:The Zhejiang LNG tanker explosion on 13 June 2020\",\"authors\":\"Hu hang , Wang yiran , Jiang Hongfei , Huang Man , Han chunmao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) > 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 107361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924004017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924004017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experience of multidisciplinary cooperation in treating 15 extensively burned casualties:The Zhejiang LNG tanker explosion on 13 June 2020
Background
On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.
Methods
A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) > 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.
Results
The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).
Conclusion
Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.