多学科合作救治15名大面积烧伤伤员的经验:2020年6月13日浙江液化天然气油轮爆炸。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Burns Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2024.107361
Hu hang , Wang yiran , Jiang Hongfei , Huang Man , Han chunmao
{"title":"多学科合作救治15名大面积烧伤伤员的经验:2020年6月13日浙江液化天然气油轮爆炸。","authors":"Hu hang ,&nbsp;Wang yiran ,&nbsp;Jiang Hongfei ,&nbsp;Huang Man ,&nbsp;Han chunmao","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) &gt; 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 107361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of multidisciplinary cooperation in treating 15 extensively burned casualties:The Zhejiang LNG tanker explosion on 13 June 2020\",\"authors\":\"Hu hang ,&nbsp;Wang yiran ,&nbsp;Jiang Hongfei ,&nbsp;Huang Man ,&nbsp;Han chunmao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.107361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) &gt; 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 107361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924004017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924004017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年6月13日,中国东部地区发生一起涉及液化天然气(LNG)罐车的爆炸事故。在普通ICU烧伤重症监护病房(ICU)联合病房治疗了15例极重度烧伤患者(简称“6·13”患者)。方法:组建由医生129人、护士126人、辅助人员165人组成的多学科治疗团队。此外,来自中国不同地区的15名烧伤和ICU专家加入了我们。治疗结束后,收集患者资料并进行分析。回顾性比较了死亡和存活患者临床资料的差异。随后,收集2016 - 2023年我院烧伤科收治的177例非“6.13”总烧伤体表面积(TBSA) > 50 %患者的临床资料,比较多学科协同治疗模式的疗效。结果:15例“6.13”患者TBSA平均85.07 ± 15.85 %(范围50 ~ 98 %)。其中TBSA≥90 % 11例,≥95 % 6例。7名患者因伤势过重而死亡,8名患者存活。严重并发症的发生率,如多器官衰竭(MOF)和真菌感染,在死亡组高于生存组。存活组在第30天和第60天植皮修复的烧伤创面面积较大,残余创面面积明显小于死亡组。与非“6·13”患者相比,“6·13”患者明显年龄更大,TBSA面积更大,三度TBSA面积更大,平均修正Baux评分更高。修正Baux评分经1:2匹配后,“6.13”组手术次数显著高于“6.13”组(p值=0.007)。“6.13”组死亡率较低,但无统计学意义(20 % vs 55 %,p = 0.119;Kaplan-Meier曲线的log-rank p = 0.059)。结论:在综合治疗方案的指导下,多学科合作可以改善大面积烧伤患者的治疗。及时有效的手术治疗是降低死亡率和改善患者预后的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience of multidisciplinary cooperation in treating 15 extensively burned casualties:The Zhejiang LNG tanker explosion on 13 June 2020

Background

On June 13, 2020, an explosion involving a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker truck occurred in eastern China. Fifteen patients with extremely severe burns (referred to as “June 13” patients) were treated in the burn-intensive care unit (ICU) joint ward within the general ICU.

Methods

A multidisciplinary treatment team comprising 129 doctors, 126 nurses, and 165 auxiliary staff members was assembled. Additionally, 15 burn and ICU experts from various regions of China joined us. After concluding the treatment, patient data were collected and analyzed. The differences in clinical data between the deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively compared. Subsequently, the clinical data of 177 non-“June 13” patients with total burned body surface area (TBSA) > 50 % treated in the burn department from 2016 to 2023 were collected to compare the efficacy of our multidisciplinary collaborative treatment model.

Results

The average TBSA of 15 “June 13” patients was 85.07 ± 15.85 % (range 50–98 %). Among them, 11 patients had a TBSA greater than 90 %, with 6 exceeding 95 %. Seven patients succumbed to their injuries, while 8 patients survived. The incidence of severe complications, such as multiple organ failure (MOF) and fungal infections, was higher in the deceased group than in the survival group. The surviving patients exhibited larger burn wound areas repaired by skin grafting on the 30th and 60th days, with significantly less residual wound area than the deceased group. In comparison with the non-“June 13” patients, the “June 13” patients were notably older and had larger TBSA, as well as larger areas of third-degree TBSA and higher mean revised Baux scores. After 1:2 matching for revised Baux score, the “June 13” group underwent a significantly higher number of operations (p-value =0.007). The “June 13” group showed a lower mortality rate, although not statistically significant (20 % vs 55 %, p = 0.119; log-rank p = 0.059 for Kaplan-Meier curves).

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary collaboration, guided by a comprehensive treatment plan, may improve the management of patients with extensive burns. Timely and effective surgical management is crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient prognosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
期刊最新文献
Impaired branched-chain amino acid catabolism serves as a metabolic hallmark and therapeutic target in keloids Single-cell RNA-seq reveals increased TNFRSF9+ senescent fibroblasts and enhanced crosstalk between TNFRSF9+ fibroblasts and neural cells in keloids Physical morbidity after burns: A cross-sectional analysis of chronic sequelae and patient-reported outcomes from the Burn Model System National Database Comment on “Continuous zigzag excision: A surgical technique for keloids of the auricular helix after burn injury” Natural deep eutectic solvent-based composites for active wound dressings: A review of structure-property-function relationships and translational challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1