人工智能引导的虚拟活检:使用深度学习自动区分脑胶质瘤与其他良性和恶性MRI结果。

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae225
Mathias Holtkamp, Vicky Parmar, René Hosch, Luca Salhöfer, Hanna Styczen, Yan Li, Marcel Opitz, Martin Glas, Nika Guberina, Karsten Wrede, Cornelius Deuschl, Michael Forsting, Felix Nensa, Lale Umutlu, Johannes Haubold
{"title":"人工智能引导的虚拟活检:使用深度学习自动区分脑胶质瘤与其他良性和恶性MRI结果。","authors":"Mathias Holtkamp, Vicky Parmar, René Hosch, Luca Salhöfer, Hanna Styczen, Yan Li, Marcel Opitz, Martin Glas, Nika Guberina, Karsten Wrede, Cornelius Deuschl, Michael Forsting, Felix Nensa, Lale Umutlu, Johannes Haubold","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop an automated algorithm to noninvasively distinguish gliomas from other intracranial pathologies, preventing misdiagnosis and ensuring accurate analysis before further glioma assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 1280 patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies was included. It comprised 218 gliomas (mean age 54.76 ± 13.74 years; 136 males, 82 females), 514 patients with brain metastases (mean age 59.28 ± 12.36 years; 228 males, 286 females), 366 patients with inflammatory lesions (mean age 41.94 ± 14.57 years; 142 males, 224 females), 99 intracerebral hemorrhages (mean age 62.68 ± 16.64 years; 56 males, 43 females), and 83 meningiomas (mean age 63.99 ± 13.31 years; 25 males, 58 females). Radiomic features were extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), contrast-enhanced, and noncontrast T1-weighted MR sequences. Subcohorts, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, were established for model validation. Machine learning models, primarily XGBoost, were trained to distinguish gliomas from other pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated promising results in distinguishing gliomas from various intracranial pathologies. The best-performing model consistently achieved high area-under-the-curve (AUC) values, indicating strong discriminatory power across multiple distinctions, including gliomas versus metastases (AUC = 0.96), gliomas versus inflammatory lesions (AUC = 1.0), gliomas versus intracerebral hemorrhages (AUC = 0.99), gliomas versus meningiomas (AUC = 0.98). Additionally, across all these entities, gliomas had an AUC of 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study presents an automated approach that effectively distinguishes gliomas from common intracranial pathologies. This can serve as a quality control upstream to further artificial-intelligence-based genetic analysis of cerebral gliomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdae225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-guided virtual biopsy: Automated differentiation of cerebral gliomas from other benign and malignant MRI findings using deep learning.\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Holtkamp, Vicky Parmar, René Hosch, Luca Salhöfer, Hanna Styczen, Yan Li, Marcel Opitz, Martin Glas, Nika Guberina, Karsten Wrede, Cornelius Deuschl, Michael Forsting, Felix Nensa, Lale Umutlu, Johannes Haubold\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop an automated algorithm to noninvasively distinguish gliomas from other intracranial pathologies, preventing misdiagnosis and ensuring accurate analysis before further glioma assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 1280 patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies was included. It comprised 218 gliomas (mean age 54.76 ± 13.74 years; 136 males, 82 females), 514 patients with brain metastases (mean age 59.28 ± 12.36 years; 228 males, 286 females), 366 patients with inflammatory lesions (mean age 41.94 ± 14.57 years; 142 males, 224 females), 99 intracerebral hemorrhages (mean age 62.68 ± 16.64 years; 56 males, 43 females), and 83 meningiomas (mean age 63.99 ± 13.31 years; 25 males, 58 females). Radiomic features were extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), contrast-enhanced, and noncontrast T1-weighted MR sequences. Subcohorts, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, were established for model validation. Machine learning models, primarily XGBoost, were trained to distinguish gliomas from other pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated promising results in distinguishing gliomas from various intracranial pathologies. The best-performing model consistently achieved high area-under-the-curve (AUC) values, indicating strong discriminatory power across multiple distinctions, including gliomas versus metastases (AUC = 0.96), gliomas versus inflammatory lesions (AUC = 1.0), gliomas versus intracerebral hemorrhages (AUC = 0.99), gliomas versus meningiomas (AUC = 0.98). Additionally, across all these entities, gliomas had an AUC of 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study presents an automated approach that effectively distinguishes gliomas from common intracranial pathologies. This can serve as a quality control upstream to further artificial-intelligence-based genetic analysis of cerebral gliomas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在开发一种自动化算法,以无创区分胶质瘤与其他颅内病变,防止误诊,并确保在进一步胶质瘤评估之前准确分析。方法:纳入1280例不同颅内病理的患者。其中胶质瘤218例(平均年龄54.76±13.74岁;男性136例,女性82例),脑转移514例(平均年龄59.28±12.36岁;男性228例,女性286例),炎性病变366例(平均年龄41.94±14.57岁;男性142例,女性224例),脑出血99例(平均年龄62.68±16.64岁;男性56例,女性43例),脑膜瘤83例(平均年龄63.99±13.31岁;男性25人,女性58人)。从流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)、对比度增强和非对比度t1加权MR序列中提取放射学特征。建立分队列,80%用于训练,20%用于测试,用于模型验证。机器学习模型,主要是XGBoost,被训练来区分胶质瘤和其他病理。结果:该研究在区分胶质瘤与各种颅内病变方面显示了良好的结果。表现最好的模型始终获得较高的曲线下面积(AUC)值,表明在多种区分方面具有很强的区分能力,包括胶质瘤与转移瘤(AUC = 0.96),胶质瘤与炎性病变(AUC = 1.0),胶质瘤与脑出血(AUC = 0.99),胶质瘤与脑膜瘤(AUC = 0.98)。此外,在所有这些实体中,胶质瘤的AUC为0.94。结论:该研究提出了一种自动化的方法,可以有效地将胶质瘤与常见的颅内病变区分开来。这可以作为进一步基于人工智能的脑胶质瘤遗传分析的上游质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI-guided virtual biopsy: Automated differentiation of cerebral gliomas from other benign and malignant MRI findings using deep learning.

Background: This study aimed to develop an automated algorithm to noninvasively distinguish gliomas from other intracranial pathologies, preventing misdiagnosis and ensuring accurate analysis before further glioma assessment.

Methods: A cohort of 1280 patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies was included. It comprised 218 gliomas (mean age 54.76 ± 13.74 years; 136 males, 82 females), 514 patients with brain metastases (mean age 59.28 ± 12.36 years; 228 males, 286 females), 366 patients with inflammatory lesions (mean age 41.94 ± 14.57 years; 142 males, 224 females), 99 intracerebral hemorrhages (mean age 62.68 ± 16.64 years; 56 males, 43 females), and 83 meningiomas (mean age 63.99 ± 13.31 years; 25 males, 58 females). Radiomic features were extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), contrast-enhanced, and noncontrast T1-weighted MR sequences. Subcohorts, with 80% for training and 20% for testing, were established for model validation. Machine learning models, primarily XGBoost, were trained to distinguish gliomas from other pathologies.

Results: The study demonstrated promising results in distinguishing gliomas from various intracranial pathologies. The best-performing model consistently achieved high area-under-the-curve (AUC) values, indicating strong discriminatory power across multiple distinctions, including gliomas versus metastases (AUC = 0.96), gliomas versus inflammatory lesions (AUC = 1.0), gliomas versus intracerebral hemorrhages (AUC = 0.99), gliomas versus meningiomas (AUC = 0.98). Additionally, across all these entities, gliomas had an AUC of 0.94.

Conclusions: The study presents an automated approach that effectively distinguishes gliomas from common intracranial pathologies. This can serve as a quality control upstream to further artificial-intelligence-based genetic analysis of cerebral gliomas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictive value of brain tumor reporting and data system scores for functional outcomes and progression-free survival in glioblastoma. OLIG2-STAT5 cooperation supports glioma stem cell maintenance and proliferation in glioblastoma. Surgical resection or bevacizumab for treatment of radiation necrosis-associated cerebral edema in patients with brain metastases: A single center experience. A single-institution retrospective study of multicentric gliomas stratified by IDH mutational status. A common signature of brain metastases among patients with breast cancer, melanoma, and lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1