Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Peipei Xu, Keith Olsen, Anders Granholm, Xiaodong Jin, Lingli Zhang, Gordon Guyatt
{"title":"在中国,药剂师主导的干预减少酸抑制治疗对重症监护室应激性溃疡预防的有效性:一项多中心、楔形步进、集群随机对照试验。","authors":"Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Peipei Xu, Keith Olsen, Anders Granholm, Xiaodong Jin, Lingli Zhang, Gordon Guyatt","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention in decreasing the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) compared with the usual care for adult patients in Chinese ICUs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-six ICUs in China from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We enrolled 2199 patients 18 years old or older who were newly admitted to the participating ICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex intervention measures, a multidisciplinary team (Scenarios, Improving and Refining Interventions, Constructing, Refining and Testing Research Theories, Incorporating Stakeholders, Identifying Important Uncertainties, and Economics Considerations) designed a multifaceted intervention.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients receiving SUP and that with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses using generalized linear mixed models to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) with random effects for the site. The proportion of patients receiving SUP in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (45.5% vs. 49.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.017). The proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding was similar (3.7% vs. 4.0%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-2.85; p = 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pharmacist-led intervention reduced the proportion of patients receiving SUP in the ICUs, without significantly affecting the proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings will help guide ICU medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e805-e816"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Acid Suppression Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in ICUs in China: A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Peipei Xu, Keith Olsen, Anders Granholm, Xiaodong Jin, Lingli Zhang, Gordon Guyatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention in decreasing the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) compared with the usual care for adult patients in Chinese ICUs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-six ICUs in China from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We enrolled 2199 patients 18 years old or older who were newly admitted to the participating ICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex intervention measures, a multidisciplinary team (Scenarios, Improving and Refining Interventions, Constructing, Refining and Testing Research Theories, Incorporating Stakeholders, Identifying Important Uncertainties, and Economics Considerations) designed a multifaceted intervention.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients receiving SUP and that with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses using generalized linear mixed models to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) with random effects for the site. The proportion of patients receiving SUP in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (45.5% vs. 49.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.017). The proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding was similar (3.7% vs. 4.0%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-2.85; p = 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pharmacist-led intervention reduced the proportion of patients receiving SUP in the ICUs, without significantly affecting the proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings will help guide ICU medical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e805-e816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952691/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估药剂师主导的干预措施在减少应激性溃疡预防(SUP)过度使用方面的有效性,与中国icu成人患者的常规护理相比。设计:实用、多中心、楔形踏步、集群随机对照试验。设定:2022年10月至2023年3月,中国26个icu。患者:我们招募了2199名18岁及以上的新入组icu的患者。干预措施:利用医学研究委员会制定和评估复杂干预措施的框架,一个多学科小组(设想、改进和改进干预措施、构建、改进和测试研究理论、纳入利益相关者、识别重要的不确定性和经济考虑因素)设计了一个多方面的干预措施。测量和主要结果:主要结果是接受SUP治疗的患者和有明显胃肠道出血的患者的比例。我们使用广义线性混合模型进行意向治疗分析,以调整潜在的混杂因素(年龄、性别、急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分)和随机效应。干预组接受SUP的患者比例低于对照组(45.5% vs 49.5%;优势比[OR], 0.81;95% ci, 0.68-0.96;P = 0.017)。明显消化道出血的患者比例相似(3.7% vs. 4.0%;或者,1.05;95% ci, 0.65-2.85;P = 0.81)。结论:药师主导的干预降低了icu中接受SUP的患者比例,但未显著影响明显胃肠道出血患者的比例。这些发现将有助于指导ICU的医疗决策。
Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Acid Suppression Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in ICUs in China: A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention in decreasing the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) compared with the usual care for adult patients in Chinese ICUs.
Setting: Twenty-six ICUs in China from October 2022 to March 2023.
Patients: We enrolled 2199 patients 18 years old or older who were newly admitted to the participating ICUs.
Interventions: Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex intervention measures, a multidisciplinary team (Scenarios, Improving and Refining Interventions, Constructing, Refining and Testing Research Theories, Incorporating Stakeholders, Identifying Important Uncertainties, and Economics Considerations) designed a multifaceted intervention.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients receiving SUP and that with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses using generalized linear mixed models to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) with random effects for the site. The proportion of patients receiving SUP in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (45.5% vs. 49.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.017). The proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding was similar (3.7% vs. 4.0%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-2.85; p = 0.81).
Conclusions: The pharmacist-led intervention reduced the proportion of patients receiving SUP in the ICUs, without significantly affecting the proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings will help guide ICU medical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.