用摆锤模型比较不同受力板之间的压力中心数据。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.026
Sam Limpach , Peter Leinen , Thomas Muehlbauer , Katharina Borgmann , Stefan Panzer
{"title":"用摆锤模型比较不同受力板之间的压力中心数据。","authors":"Sam Limpach ,&nbsp;Peter Leinen ,&nbsp;Thomas Muehlbauer ,&nbsp;Katharina Borgmann ,&nbsp;Stefan Panzer","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Force plates are used to measure postural control. However, force plates differ with regard to the type of sensors and the position of the sensors. The purpose of the study was to introduce a method for testing the comparability of two force plates with different force transducers regarding their center of pressure (CoP) capturing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two portable force plates (Kistler Model 9260AA vs. AMTI AccuSway-Optimized ACS-O) were compared. To produce repeatable, close to identical CoP data, a two-point suspension pendulum was used. The deflection angle of the pendulum was kept constant as well as the time of capturing the swing (30 s) and the frequency of capturing the data (1000 Hz). To test for comparability, the captured data was z-transformed and superimposed. Furthermore, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results and significance</h3><div>The ICC for the two tested force plates were \"excellent\" (x-axis: ICC = 0.990 (95 % CI [0.990–0.990]), y-axis: ICC = 0.987 (95 % CI [0.987–0.988])). Thus, the presented method with the two-point suspension pendulum generated repeatable and almost identical oscillations in the x- and y-axis to calculate the CoP.</div></div><div><h3>Data availability</h3><div>Data will be made available on request.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pendulum model to compare center of pressure data between different force plates\",\"authors\":\"Sam Limpach ,&nbsp;Peter Leinen ,&nbsp;Thomas Muehlbauer ,&nbsp;Katharina Borgmann ,&nbsp;Stefan Panzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Force plates are used to measure postural control. However, force plates differ with regard to the type of sensors and the position of the sensors. The purpose of the study was to introduce a method for testing the comparability of two force plates with different force transducers regarding their center of pressure (CoP) capturing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two portable force plates (Kistler Model 9260AA vs. AMTI AccuSway-Optimized ACS-O) were compared. To produce repeatable, close to identical CoP data, a two-point suspension pendulum was used. The deflection angle of the pendulum was kept constant as well as the time of capturing the swing (30 s) and the frequency of capturing the data (1000 Hz). To test for comparability, the captured data was z-transformed and superimposed. Furthermore, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results and significance</h3><div>The ICC for the two tested force plates were \\\"excellent\\\" (x-axis: ICC = 0.990 (95 % CI [0.990–0.990]), y-axis: ICC = 0.987 (95 % CI [0.987–0.988])). Thus, the presented method with the two-point suspension pendulum generated repeatable and almost identical oscillations in the x- and y-axis to calculate the CoP.</div></div><div><h3>Data availability</h3><div>Data will be made available on request.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 13-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:力板用于测量姿势控制。然而,力板在传感器的类型和传感器的位置方面有所不同。本研究的目的是介绍一种方法来测试具有不同力传感器的两个力板在其压力中心(CoP)捕获方面的可比性。方法:比较两种便携式测力板(Kistler 9260AA型和AMTI accway - optimized ACS-O型)。为了获得可重复的、接近相同的CoP数据,使用了两点悬挂摆。保持摆的偏转角度、捕获摆动的时间(30 s)和捕获数据的频率(1000 Hz)不变。为了测试可比性,捕获的数据进行了z变换和叠加。此外,还计算了类间相关系数(ICC)估计值及其95% %置信区间(CI)。结果及意义:两种测力板的ICC均为“优”(x轴:ICC = 0.990(95 % CI [0.990-0.990]), y轴:ICC = 0.987(95 % CI[0.987-0.988])。因此,所提出的方法与两点悬摆产生可重复的和几乎相同的振荡在x和y轴计算CoP。数据可得性:应要求提供数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pendulum model to compare center of pressure data between different force plates

Background

Force plates are used to measure postural control. However, force plates differ with regard to the type of sensors and the position of the sensors. The purpose of the study was to introduce a method for testing the comparability of two force plates with different force transducers regarding their center of pressure (CoP) capturing.

Methods

Two portable force plates (Kistler Model 9260AA vs. AMTI AccuSway-Optimized ACS-O) were compared. To produce repeatable, close to identical CoP data, a two-point suspension pendulum was used. The deflection angle of the pendulum was kept constant as well as the time of capturing the swing (30 s) and the frequency of capturing the data (1000 Hz). To test for comparability, the captured data was z-transformed and superimposed. Furthermore, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results and significance

The ICC for the two tested force plates were "excellent" (x-axis: ICC = 0.990 (95 % CI [0.990–0.990]), y-axis: ICC = 0.987 (95 % CI [0.987–0.988])). Thus, the presented method with the two-point suspension pendulum generated repeatable and almost identical oscillations in the x- and y-axis to calculate the CoP.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Upper body kinematics during walking and their relationship to fall risk after stroke Optimizing focal vibration therapy for balance and gait: A systematic review The relationship between clinical joint hyper-resistance scores and gait kinematics in patients with central neurological disorders: A systematic review The effect of footwear on walking biomechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1